Re: Wolves in sheeps clothing
- From: wf3h@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:04:03 -0500
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:59:26 -0800 (PST), Ray Martinez
Atheists are outraged at Christianity and the Bible, their worldview
enemy.
seems like creationists are outraged at science.
Dana Tweedy is the prime example on this NG of an Atheist-evolutionist
who hates Creationists, Christianity and the Bible. Everything you say
is geared to make Christianity and the Bible look false and stupid.
well...no, ray. that's your job.
No one could tell the difference between what you write and that which
John Harshman or Richard Dawkins writes. Imagine that, a "Christian"
who cannot be distinguished from lunatic Atheists like a John Harshman
or Richard Dawkins?
now let's see...if an atheist and a creationist write that an acid and
a base form a salt, how can i tell the difference between them?
science is science. you shouldn't be able to tell the difference
between a believer and non believer when they discuss science.
Lastly, this entire double agent game you play is because you are
demonically angry and hateful. That is why you assume the role of a
double agent. The only other option is that you are horribly deluded
like Judas the Betrayer.
Nothing refutes the fact (and the logic that binds the fact): the
numerical number of Atheists who rabidly endorse evolution means that
the objective claims of evolution support the Atheism worldview
evolution neither supports nor denies the 'atheist worldview'
(whatever that is) more than any other science.
, which
makes Christian evolutionists fools, morons, or double agents or
wolves in sheeps clothing. To admit, of course, would falsify. You
cannot admit as no one would admit to these charges. But the charges
are observations that anyone can plainly see. You play the oldest 5th
column deception game in the book. If you were a real Christian the
Atheists on this Forum would treat you like they treat me or any other
Christian who argues the objective claims of the Bible and evolution.
I am comforted that you must play a game and make a fool and liar out
of yourself in every message that you write in order to insulate the
most 101 fact concerning Darwinism and evolution: it is Atheist
ideology packaged as science every step of the way.
Evolution is a scientific theory. It's neither 'friendly' or 'unfriendly'
to any religious belief. The Bible was written thousands of years before
evolution was discovered, so there is no reason to expect it to "support"
this theory.
Nonetheless, the scientific theory of evolution is not hostile to religion,
and while the Bible doesn't "support" evolution, it doesn't refute it
either.
This tactic
is, of course, a tactic. Evolution remains, as it always has, as an
implacable enemy to the Bible and Christianity.
Evolution is a scientific theory. It's not the enemy of either the Bible,
or Christanity.
As much as I
personally like FB this is about truth and FB is lying or he is
deluded.
You keep forgetting the most likely option... that you are wrong.
There is no way to tell which nefarious condition is actually
true.
Neither, obviously.
He has no truth whatsoever on his side but ridiculous assertions
built on private interpretations of isolated passages that ignore the
plain wholistic message of the Bible, and word meanings.
Ray, you have no "facts" either, and your own interpretations of the Bible
are bizarre, to say the least.
The Bible is the source for supernaturalism and miracles and it says
reality is caused by God's supernatural power or spoken word.
Good example of your bizarre ideas... The source of "supernaturalism" is a
belief in the supernatural. There's no evidence that the supernatural
exists. Same for miracles. Either you believe in them, or you don't.
Evolution says this is false; that supernatural power is not
responsible for reality or living things.
Actually, evolution doesn't deal with such things. If "supernatual power"
is involved, it's beyond the ability of science to detect.
Like I said: FB is lying or he is deluded.
Or, you are wrong.
Creation always means that origins was not by natural God-not-involved-
evolution;
Ray, you don't get to re-define words. Creation does not mean that
"evolution didn't happen".
and evolution always means that creation or direct Divine
power is not seen in reality or natural processes. FB and TEism or
CEism is refuted by this 101 fact alone.
Again, your "101 fact" is nothing but your own irrational fantasy.
It appears Snex that you are ruining their plot to corrupt the Bible
and trick naive Christians into accepting evolutionary theory.
There is no "plot". Evolution is a scientific theory, which is supported
by a great deal of evidence. Accepting this evidence is not "corrupting
the Bible".
>You
need to get in line with your fellow evolutionists all of whom, in
this NG, except for yourself and a few others, appear to be liars or
horribly deluded.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Wolves in sheeps clothing
- From: Robert J. Kolker
- Re: Wolves in sheeps clothing
- Prev by Date: Re: Sean Pitman still won't answer
- Next by Date: Re: Seth Shostak and SETI
- Previous by thread: Re: Sean Pitman still won't answer
- Next by thread: Re: Wolves in sheeps clothing
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
