Re: Gould criticism and reviews
- From: try@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (The Enigmatic One)
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 03:19:16 -0600
In article <SUCxj.52197$jH4.12147@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
seemysig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
John Harshman wrote:
(Though in fact living fossils are not the sort of thing PE is about.)
They are an instance of equilibrium in evolution.
I find you hopelessly confused on the subject of stasis and PE.
Yet you have no coherent criticsm of anything I have said.
Erm, no.
You being too fucking stupid to comprehend doesn't mean he isn't coherent,
just that you're a moron.
-Tim
.
- References:
- Gould criticism and reviews
- From: Tim Tyler
- Re: Gould criticism and reviews
- From: jdb
- Re: Gould criticism and reviews
- From: Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Gould criticism and reviews
- From: Tim Tyler
- Re: Gould criticism and reviews
- From: John Harshman
- Re: Gould criticism and reviews
- From: Tim Tyler
- Gould criticism and reviews
- Prev by Date: Re: Gould criticism and reviews
- Next by Date: Re: Gould criticism and reviews
- Previous by thread: Re: Gould criticism and reviews
- Next by thread: Re: Gould criticism and reviews
- Index(es):