Re: Birdbrain: The Faith of Naturalism

Jason Spaceman wrote:

Read it at http://tbirdnow.mee.nu/the_faith_of_naturalism

Neither the existence or non-existence of God can be decided empirically. Therefore the issue is bogus. It is not worth the time of intelligent people to even argue about it.

The materiality of the world has more evidence supporting it than its denial. We do not duck the Wrath of God. But we do swerve to avoid traffic accidents.

Bob Kolker

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Possible vs. Likely
    ... Just how bogus can you get. ... when you know for a fact that the design science never existed? ... alternative worth mentioning, no science worth presenting, no argument ... Running and pretending is just a bogus form of argument. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Possible vs. Likely
    ... Just how bogus can you get. ... when you know for a fact that the design science never existed? ... alternative worth mentioning, no science worth presenting, no argument ... Running and pretending is just a bogus form of argument. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Possible vs. Likely
    ... Just how bogus can you get. ... Where is that intelligent design science that you would ... alternative worth mentioning, no science worth presenting, no argument ... Running and pretending is just a bogus form of argument. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Martin Vs Spin. (No outside help Plz)
    ... I don't give a damn about what you think of the programme. ... You want to argue about something in it go argue with Dr. Rutherford. ... I don't really think a debate about what I find interesting would be worth while. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Sourcing Wholewheat flour
    ... nutrition, religous reawakening, other health issues, or whatever, then it might be worth it. ... How did you feel when you discovered that mechanical dough development was bogus? ...
    (rec.food.sourdough)
Loading