Re: real theories vs imaginary tales such as natural selection

On Feb 23, 2:23 am, topmind <topm...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It is YOUR job to present the evidence here.

It is your responsibility to have a basic knowledge of a topic before
making statements about it. You have no understanding of science.

See, you put your fingers
on the keyboard and type the algorithm or formula or precise objective
rules to determining whether or not something is "science".

Continuing to pretend that this information has not been provided
serves only to demonstrate your profound dishonesty and stupidity.

The scientific method in a nutshell: Observe, hypothesize, predict,
test, repeat. Observations must be replicable. Hypotheses must be
falsifiable.

Some URLs, found quickly with Google, with more details and additional
references:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A918461
http://phyun5.ucr.edu/~wudka/Physics7/Notes_www/node6.html
http://www.biologycorner.com/bio1/scimethod.html
http://wilstar.com/theories.htm
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/The_Scientific_Method/Introduction_to_Science

A particularly excellent summary from Zachriel:
http://zachriel.blogspot.com/2005/08/scientific-method.html)

BJ

----
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.origins/msg/dfa00a58f25f28ac:
Bryce Jacobs (topmind@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
| First make a list of the first 500 prime numbers:
| A: 1, 3, 7, 11, 13, 17, 29 .....


.

Relevant Pages