talk.origins
- another link no longer missing,
The Bicycling Guitarist
- Blog: Creationist University,
Ye Old One
- Non-beneficial Gaps,
Seanpit
- News: Ah, that's the spot: Why scratching brings relief.,
Ye Old One
- News: After more than 100 years apart, webworms devastate New Zealand parsnips.,
Ye Old One
- Blue-eyed Humans Have A Single, Common Ancestor,
TomS
- Re: Blue-eyed Humans Have A Single, Common Ancestor,
Padmar Mushkin
- Re: Blue-eyed Humans Have A Single, Common Ancestor,
John Harshman
- Re: Blue-eyed Humans Have A Single, Common Ancestor,
Padmar Mushkin
- Re: Blue-eyed Humans Have A Single, Common Ancestor,
snex
- Re: Blue-eyed Humans Have A Single, Common Ancestor,
John Harshman
- Re: Blue-eyed Humans Have A Single, Common Ancestor,
Greg G.
- Re: Blue-eyed Humans Have A Single, Common Ancestor,
Terry
- Re: Blue-eyed Humans Have A Single, Common Ancestor,
Martin Andersen
- Re: Blue-eyed Humans Have A Single, Common Ancestor,
Cheezits
- Re: Blue-eyed Humans Have A Single, Common Ancestor,
Martin Andersen
- Re: Blue-eyed Humans Have A Single, Common Ancestor,
Ken Denny
- News: "The Evolution Channel: A Celebration of Darwin's Birthday",
Ye Old One
- DNA in the Bible?,
demaction
- Re: History Channel special on astrobiology,
Elmer
- Forget Logos, ID is better defended with Legos,
Frank J
- Why do humans live so long?,
Strange Creature
- Blog: Questions for "Evolutionists".,
Ye Old One
- News: Evolution Weekend to elevate discussion on religion and science.,
Ye Old One
- Re: News: Evolution Weekend to elevate discussion on religion and,
wf3h
- Re: News: Evolution Weekend to elevate discussion on religion and,
eerok
- Re: News: Evolution Weekend to elevate discussion on religion and,
alwaysaskingquestions
- Re: News: Evolution Weekend to elevate discussion on religion and,
Martin Andersen
- Re: News: Evolution Weekend to elevate discussion on religion and,
alwaysaskingquestions
- Re: News: Evolution Weekend to elevate discussion on religion and,
Martin Andersen
- Re: News: Evolution Weekend to elevate discussion on religion and,
alwaysaskingquestions
- Re: News: Evolution Weekend to elevate discussion on religion and,
Martin Andersen
- Re: News: Evolution Weekend to elevate discussion on religion and,
alwaysaskingquestions
- Re: News: Evolution Weekend to elevate discussion on religion and,
Martin Andersen
- Re: News: Evolution Weekend to elevate discussion on religion and,
coaster
- Re: News: Evolution Weekend to elevate discussion on religion and,
Rodjk #613
- Re: News: Evolution Weekend to elevate discussion on religion and,
wf3h
- Re: News: Evolution Weekend to elevate discussion on religion and,
Dick C.
- Re: News: Evolution Weekend to elevate discussion on religion and,
wf3h
- Re: News: Evolution Weekend to elevate discussion on religion and,
Mr D.
- Re: News: Evolution Weekend to elevate discussion on religion and,
JohnN
- Re: News: Evolution Weekend to elevate discussion on religion and,
shipmodeler1
- Re: News: Evolution Weekend to elevate discussion on religion and,
coaster
- Re: News: Evolution Weekend to elevate discussion on religion and,
Martin Andersen
- Re: News: Evolution Weekend to elevate discussion on religion and,
alwaysaskingquestions
- Re: News: Evolution Weekend to elevate discussion on religion and,
Dick C.
- Re: News: Evolution Weekend to elevate discussion on religion and,
coaster
- Re: News: Evolution Weekend to elevate discussion on religion and,
alwaysaskingquestions
- Re: News: Evolution Weekend to elevate discussion on religion and,
alwaysaskingquestions
- Re: News: Evolution Weekend to elevate discussion on religion and,
JohnN
- OpEd: The Repeater.,
Ye Old One
- Florida legislator: Expect evolution bills,
Jason Spaceman
- In the News: Proposed science standards debated in Fla.,
Jason Spaceman
- Re: In the News: Proposed science standards debated in Fla.,
Ron O
- Re: In the News: Proposed science standards debated in Fla.,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: In the News: Proposed science standards debated in Fla.,
Andre Lieven
- Re: In the News: Proposed science standards debated in Fla.,
John Wilkins
- Re: In the News: Proposed science standards debated in Fla.,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: In the News: Proposed science standards debated in Fla.,
Walter Bushell
- Re: In the News: Proposed science standards debated in Fla.,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: In the News: Proposed science standards debated in Fla.,
richardalanforrest
- Re: In the News: Proposed science standards debated in Fla.,
Andre Lieven
- Re: In the News: Proposed science standards debated in Fla.,
wf3h
- Re: In the News: Proposed science standards debated in Fla.,
John Wilkins
- Re: In the News: Proposed science standards debated in Fla.,
Andre Lieven
- Re: In the News: Proposed science standards debated in Fla.,
Andre Lieven
- Re: In the News: Proposed science standards debated in Fla.,
Christopher Denney
- Re: In the News: Proposed science standards debated in Fla.,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: In the News: Proposed science standards debated in Fla.,
Andre Lieven
- Re: In the News: Proposed science standards debated in Fla.,
AC
- Re: In the News: Proposed science standards debated in Fla.,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: In the News: Proposed science standards debated in Fla.,
Walter Bushell
- Re: In the News: Proposed science standards debated in Fla.,
Andre Lieven
- Re: In the News: Proposed science standards debated in Fla.,
Ron O
- Re: In the News: Proposed science standards debated in Fla.,
Bob Reasoner
- Re: In the News: Proposed science standards debated in Fla.,
Rodjk #613
- Re: In the News: Proposed science standards debated in Fla.,
Desertphile
- American dinosaur,
jcon
- OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
VBM
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
Andre Lieven
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
Davej
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
snex
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
chris thompson
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
Cheezits
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
VBM
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
Cheezits
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
VBM
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
Frank J
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
VBM
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
Frank J
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
The Last Conformist
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
peter
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
louann_m@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
VBM
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
Frank J
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
VBM
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
Frank J
- OT Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
TomS
- Re: OT Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
Cheezits
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
chris thompson
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
hhyapster
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
louann_m@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
VBM
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
VBM
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
gregwrld
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
snex
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
Frank J
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
louann_m@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
VBM
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
snex
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
John Harshman
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
Rodjk #613
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
Tony Raymonds
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
VBM
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
Frank J
- Update on Dembski post [was Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!],
VBM
- Re: Update on Dembski post [was Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's,
Andre Lieven
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
noctiluca
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
louann_m@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
Ferrous Patella
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
TomS
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
Walter Bushell
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
peter
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
noctiluca
- Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!,
VBM
- News: Europe embraces Evolution.,
Ye Old One
- Satire: Evolution Gains Momentum in Florida Church Court Case.,
Ye Old One
- In the News: Hitchens knocks intelligent design,
Jason Spaceman
- SnoozeBusters: Intelligent Design Scholars Muzzled By Scientific Establishment,
Jason Spaceman
- Re: SnoozeBusters: Intelligent Design Scholars Muzzled By Scientific Establishment,
A.Carlson
- Re: SnoozeBusters: Intelligent Design Scholars Muzzled By Scientific,
JohnN
Re: How to account for life?,
Grandbank
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: How to account for life?,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: How to account for life?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: How to account for life?,
Thurisaz the Einherjer
- Re: How to account for life?,
Bodega
- Re: How to account for life?,
Vend
- Re: How to account for life?,
Desertphile
- Re: How to account for life?,
Dr.GH
- Re: How to account for life?,
Inez
- Re: How to account for life?,
John Bode
- Re: How to account for life?,
John Stockwell
- Re: How to account for life?,
Frank J
- Re: How to account for life?,
Bob Casanova
A cool theory of abiogenesis,
dkomo
News: 'Telepathic' genes recognise similarities in each other.,
Ye Old One
News: Scientists want rewrite of Earth's time line.,
Ye Old One
News: Entire Synthetic Genome Created.,
Ye Old One
Video: How Evolution Works.,
Ye Old One
Blog: Why isn't Disco Dead? (not the dance).,
Ye Old One
Dutch broadcast company no longer selling censured BBC "Life of,
Ritsjoena
WingNutDaily columnist: The math delusion,
jspaceman
Re: WingNutDaily columnist: The math delusion,
Charles Brenner
Re: WingNutDaily columnist: The math delusion,
Kermit
Re: WingNutDaily columnist: The math delusion,
Vend
Message not available
please help me with interactive timeline project,
jon
"Thought experiments" on evolution,
Mr tiktaalik
Man Rules,
macaddicted
- Re: Man Rules,
Greg G.
- Re: Man Rules,
Earle Jones
- Re: Man Rules,
Dr.Hal0nf1r£$
- Re: Man Rules,
Ralph
- Re: Man Rules,
louann_m@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Man Rules,
Will in New Haven
- Re: Man Rules,
Richard Harter
- Re: Man Rules,
louann_m@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Man Rules,
Occidental
- Re: Man Rules,
louann_m@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Man Rules,
Will in New Haven
- Re: Man Rules,
Occidental
- Re: Man Rules,
Lee Jay
- Re: Man Rules,
Kermit
- Re: Man Rules,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Man Rules,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Man Rules,
Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)
- Re: Man Rules,
Inez
- Re: Man Rules,
luv2argue
- Re: Man Rules,
Christopher Denney
- Re: Man Rules,
Geoff
- Re: Man Rules,
Inez
- Re: Man Rules,
Inez
Re: Flood wipes out evidence - "Keima Sente" is JABRIOL,
M.M. Martinson
Letter to the Editor: Evolution and intelligent design,
Jason Spaceman
- Re: Letter to the Editor: Evolution and intelligent design,
Mr D.
- Re: Letter to the Editor: Evolution and intelligent design,
Ron O
- Re: Letter to the Editor: Evolution and intelligent design,
Cerpin Taxt
- Re: Letter to the Editor: Evolution and intelligent design,
Augray
- Re: Letter to the Editor: Evolution and intelligent design,
Frank J
- Re: Letter to the Editor: Evolution and intelligent design,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Letter to the Editor: Evolution and intelligent design,
The Enigmatic One
- Re: Letter to the Editor: Evolution and intelligent design,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Letter to the Editor: Evolution and intelligent design,
TBB&BH
- Re: Letter to the Editor: Evolution and intelligent design,
jcon
- Re: Letter to the Editor: Evolution and intelligent design,
Ferrous Patella
- Re: Letter to the Editor: Evolution and intelligent design,
urillan
OT: But still denying reality,
Kermit
Broccoli and BackSpace on YEC,
Friar Broccoli
Re: Flood wipes out evidence Garden of Eden existed,
Don Martin
How do you pronounce "cdesign"?,
The Last Conformist
Re: "weasel"ing intermediates,
Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
Re: Why Evolution is a metaphysical hypothesis,
Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
Would you agree?,
Earle Jones
- Re: Would you agree?,
Frank J
- Re: Would you agree?,
Mr D.
- Re: Would you agree?,
Frank J
- Re: Would you agree?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Would you agree?,
Frank J
- Re: Would you agree?,
Mr D.
- Re: Would you agree?,
Earle Jones
- Re: Would you agree?,
Frank J
- Re: Would you agree?,
Puppet_Sock
- Re: Would you agree?,
Frank J
- Re: Would you agree?,
Max
- Re: Would you agree?,
Earle Jones
- Re: Would you agree?,
Frank J
- Re: Would you agree?,
Christopher Denney
- Re: Would you agree?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Would you agree?,
eroot
- Re: Would you agree?,
Bodega
- Re: Would you agree?,
Anlatt the Builder
- Re: Would you agree?,
Tom McDonald
- Re: Would you agree?,
Tom McDonald
- Re: Would you agree?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Would you agree?,
Dan Drake
- Re: Would you agree?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Would you agree?,
Dan Drake
- Re: Would you agree?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Would you agree?,
TomS
- Re: Would you agree?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Would you agree?,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Would you agree?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Would you agree?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Would you agree?,
TomS
- Re: Would you agree?,
Dan Drake
- Re: Would you agree?,
Mr D.
- Re: Would you agree?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Would you agree?,
A.Carlson
- Re: Would you agree?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Would you agree?,
Mr D.
- Re: Would you agree?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Would you agree?,
Mr D.
- Re: Would you agree?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Would you agree?,
Mr D.
- Re: Would you agree?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Would you agree?,
Mr D.
- Re: Would you agree?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Would you agree?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Would you agree?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Would you agree?,
eerok
- Re: Would you agree?,
Christopher Denney
- Re: Would you agree?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Would you agree?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Would you agree?,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Would you agree?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Would you agree?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Would you agree?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Would you agree?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Would you agree?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Would you agree?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Would you agree?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Would you agree?,
Dan Drake
- Re: Would you agree?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Would you agree?,
Dan Drake
- Re: Would you agree?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Would you agree?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Would you agree?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Would you agree?,
Mr D.
- Re: Would you agree?,
Free Lunch
- Re: Would you agree?,
Mr D.
- Re: Would you agree?,
Free Lunch
- Re: Would you agree?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Would you agree?,
Dan Drake
- Re: Would you agree?,
eerok
- Re: Would you agree?,
Ron O
- Re: Would you agree?,
Robert J. Kolker
- Re: Would you agree?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Would you agree?,
alwaysaskingquestions
- Re: Would you agree?,
the heekster
- Re: Would you agree?,
Dr.GH
- Re: Would you agree?,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: Would you agree?,
VBM
- Re: Would you agree?,
Puppet_Sock
- Re: Would you agree?,
Ursa Gamma
- Re: Would you agree?,
wf3h
- Re: Would you agree?,
Dan Drake
- Re: Would you agree?,
Cheezits
Humour: The Ark 2008,
alwaysaskingquestions
7 Evidences For CDesign Proponentsism,
Ptet
Random thoughts triggered by Orgel's posthumous thoughts,
Perplexed in Peoria
OT: "Naturalist" bias strikes again,
Frank J
Whence comes shame?,
Jim Willemin
Re: Whence comes shame?,
Vend
Re: Whence comes shame?,
Frank J
Re: Whence comes shame?,
Kermit
Re: Whence comes shame?,
Bea Mused
Re: Whence comes shame?,
alwaysaskingquestions
Re: Whence comes shame?,
Perplexed in Peoria
Re: Whence comes shame?,
Earle Jones
Re: Whence comes shame?,
Bob Reasoner
Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Inez
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Stuart
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Kermit
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
wf3h
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Kermit
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Slimebot McGoo
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Kermit
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Kermit
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Kermit
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Kermit
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
hersheyh
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
hersheyh
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Kermit
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Craig T
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
hersheyh
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Inez
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Inez
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
hersheyh
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
hersheyh
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Kermit
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Ursa Gamma
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Ursa Gamma
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Ursa Gamma
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
hersheyh
- Message not available
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
John Stockwell
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Ursa Gamma
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Bill Morse
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Ursa Gamma
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Kermit
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Ursa Gamma
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Kermit
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Ursa Gamma
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
raven1
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
AC
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Ursa Gamma
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Ursa Gamma
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
AC
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Message not available
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
TomS
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
raven1
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
raven1
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Kermit
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
hersheyh
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Kermit
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Slimebot McGoo
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Free Lunch
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Craig T
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Kermit
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Craig T
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Craig T
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
raven1
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Inez
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Inez
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Alan Wostenberg
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Free Lunch
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Free Lunch
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Free Lunch
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Cubist
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Free Lunch
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Free Lunch
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Free Lunch
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
raven1
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Alan Wostenberg
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Kermit
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Craig T
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Craig T
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Christopher Denney
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Max
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
raven1
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Klaus H
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Kermit
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
leland . mcinnes
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
raven1
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
raven1
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
raven1
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
raven1
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
raven1
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
raven1
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Christopher Denney
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Garamond Lethe
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
leland . mcinnes
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
leland . mcinnes
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
leland . mcinnes
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Christopher Denney
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
SortingItOut
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Kermit
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Kermit
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
raven1
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Christopher Denney
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
raven1
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Christopher Denney
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Craig T
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Craig T
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Christopher Denney
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Christopher Denney
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Garamond Lethe
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Inez
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
raven1
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
brogers
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
raven1
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Inez
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Christopher Denney
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Garamond Lethe
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
hersheyh
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Christopher Denney
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
raven1
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
brogers
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
John Wilkins
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
John Wilkins
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
John Wilkins
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
hersheyh
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
hersheyh
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Christopher Denney
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
brogers
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
raven1
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
raven1
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
brogers
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Kermit
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
brogers
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
raven1
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Christopher Denney
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Kermit
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Free Lunch
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Lee Jay
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Free Lunch
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Kermit
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Kermit
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
wf3h
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
wf3h
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
wf3h
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
wf3h
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
wf3h
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
wf3h
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
wf3h
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Lee Jay
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Inez
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Ritsjoena
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
John Stockwell
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
wf3h
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Craig T
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Lee Jay
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Lee Jay
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Lee Jay
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Ernest Major
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Treus
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Lee Jay
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Lee Jay
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Timberwoof
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Ritsjoena
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Vend
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
Bob Berger
Re: Does violating the laws of physics require intelligence?,
John Bode
Lead, Follow or Get Out of the Way,
Frank J
- Re: Lead, Follow or Get Out of the Way,
Inez
- Re: Lead, Follow or Get Out of the Way,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Lead, Follow or Get Out of the Way,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: Lead, Follow or Get Out of the Way,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Lead, Follow or Get Out of the Way,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: Lead, Follow or Get Out of the Way,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: Lead, Follow or Get Out of the Way,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Lead, Follow or Get Out of the Way,
noctiluca
- Re: Lead, Follow or Get Out of the Way,
Inez
- Re: Lead, Follow or Get Out of the Way,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Lead, Follow or Get Out of the Way,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Lead, Follow or Get Out of the Way,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: Lead, Follow or Get Out of the Way,
Frank J
- Re: Lead, Follow or Get Out of the Way,
chris thompson
- Re: Lead, Follow or Get Out of the Way,
Frank J
- Re: Lead, Follow or Get Out of the Way,
Frank J
- Re: Lead, Follow or Get Out of the Way,
Steven L.
Commentary: Intelligent design sans religion in the debate,
jspaceman
Florida: Board Opposes Evolution Being Taught As Fact,
jspaceman
In the News: Nobel winners blast plan for 'Creation science',
jspaceman
DNA,
Jack Chapman
So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Mr D.
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
sasam2
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Message not available
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
AC
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
AC
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Mark Isaak
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
AC
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Gerry Murphy
- Message not available
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Message not available
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Max
Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Mark VandeWettering
Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Richard Clayton
Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Steven L.
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
AC
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
AC
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Andre Lieven
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
AC
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
AC
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
AC
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
AC
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
AC
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
AC
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Andre Lieven
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
AC
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Andre Lieven
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
AC
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Andre Lieven
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Andre Lieven
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
John Wilkins
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Michael Siemon
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
John Wilkins
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
John Wilkins
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Michael Siemon
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
John Wilkins
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
chris thompson
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Tom McDonald
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
AC
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
AC
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Andre Lieven
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Andre Lieven
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Andre Lieven
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
eroot
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
AC
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
AC
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
noctiluca
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
AC
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
AC
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
AC
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Mark Isaak
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Mark Isaak
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
eroot
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Mark Isaak
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Mark Isaak
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Mark Isaak
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
TomS
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Andre Lieven
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
AC
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
eroot
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
eroot
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
AC
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
John Wilkins
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
eroot
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Andre Lieven
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Andre Lieven
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Andre Lieven
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Desertphile
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
eroot
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Mark Isaak
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Nick Keighley
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
AC
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Frank J
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
eerok
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
noctiluca
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
noctiluca
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
John Harshman
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Krubozumo Nyankoye
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Frank J
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
louann_m@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
louann_m@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
chris thompson
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
chris thompson
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
John Harshman
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Krubozumo Nyankoye
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
eroot
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
VBM
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Mr D.
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
noctiluca
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
noctiluca
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
The Last Conformist
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
noctiluca
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
John Wilkins
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
noctiluca
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
The Last Conformist
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
John Wilkins
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
The Last Conformist
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
snex
- Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
AC
Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Frank J
Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled",
Davej
News: New Study Explains Evolution of Bird Flight.,
Ye Old One
Re: "Complexity" as a magic word,
Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
Blog: A Case Study in How Not to do it - Kent Hovind,
Ye Old One
News: Liver Transplant Girl Demi-Lee's 'Miracle' Blood Change,
Ye Old One
Re: Worried about the big bang? Here's what God says:,
Robert Carnegie
Re: Evolution of Intelligence Requires Natural "Quantum Computing",
Tony Raymonds
Evolution for non-Scientists,
JTEM
Re: Leibniz describing fitness?,
John Wilkins
"Scientists close to creating life after piecing together giant DNA jigsaw",
Ernest Major
In the News: North Florida weighing in against evolution,
Jason Spaceman
Re: Question re chimps and sign language,
Steven L.
Some questions for John Wilkins,
Earle Jones
stuck on google for a little bit, oh fnord,
Dick C.
a way to fix addictive behaviors?,
Rob Cypher
News: The Tree of Life Has Lost a Branch.,
Ye Old One
News: Adaptive functional evolution of leptin in cold-adaptive pika family.,
Ye Old One
BBC radio 4 In Our Time - Plate Tectonics,
Howard
The Chinese (strongly) imply multi-regionalism,
JTEM
questions,
gane1064
Parthenogenesis in an alternate universe,
davidwei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dawkins: Atheists a gentle people,
JM20000000
McClueless warning.,
Ye Old One
Richard Dawkins - amusing quote,
Tim Tyler
- Re: Richard Dawkins - amusing quote,
Inez
- Re: Richard Dawkins - amusing quote,
Bill Hudson
- Re: Richard Dawkins - amusing quote,
Tim Tyler
- Re: Richard Dawkins - amusing quote,
John Wilkins
- Re: Richard Dawkins - amusing quote,
Tim Tyler
- Re: Richard Dawkins - amusing quote,
Ernest Major
- Re: Richard Dawkins - amusing quote,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Richard Dawkins - amusing quote,
Ernest Major
- Re: Richard Dawkins - amusing quote,
Tim Tyler
- Re: Richard Dawkins - amusing quote,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Richard Dawkins - amusing quote,
John Harshman
- Re: Richard Dawkins - amusing quote,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Richard Dawkins - amusing quote,
John Harshman
- Re: Richard Dawkins - amusing quote,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Richard Dawkins - amusing quote,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Richard Dawkins - amusing quote,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Richard Dawkins - amusing quote,
John Harshman
- Re: Richard Dawkins - amusing quote,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Richard Dawkins - amusing quote,
John Wilkins
- Re: Richard Dawkins - amusing quote,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Richard Dawkins - amusing quote,
Vend
- Re: Richard Dawkins - amusing quote,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Richard Dawkins - amusing quote,
Vend
- Re: Richard Dawkins - amusing quote,
Nic
- Re: Richard Dawkins - amusing quote,
Tim Tyler
- Re: Richard Dawkins - amusing quote,
John Wilkins
- Re: Richard Dawkins - amusing quote,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Richard Dawkins - amusing quote,
Ernest Major
- Re: Richard Dawkins - amusing quote,
John Wilkins
- Re: Richard Dawkins - amusing quote,
Ernest Major
- Re: Richard Dawkins - amusing quote,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Richard Dawkins - amusing quote,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Richard Dawkins - amusing quote,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Richard Dawkins - amusing quote,
Tim Tyler
alt.atheism,
JM20000000
Talk.origins is an amateurish group,
JM20000000
Have we become alt.atheism?,
VBM
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Inez
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
VBM
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
wf3h
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
VBM
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
SortingItOut
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Rodjk #613
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
VBM
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Mr D.
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
VBM
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
John Harshman
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
VBM
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
eroot
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
The Last Conformist
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
noctiluca
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
noctiluca
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
AC
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
wf3h
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
VBM
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
VBM
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
VBM
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Gregory A Greenman
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
TomS
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Gregory A Greenman
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
eroot
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
TomS
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
The Last Conformist
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
The Last Conformist
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
eroot
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
The Last Conformist
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
The Last Conformist
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
eroot
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Gregory A Greenman
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
eroot
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
The Last Conformist
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
The Last Conformist
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Gregory A Greenman
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Gregory A Greenman
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Lee Jay
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
wf3h
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Lee Jay
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
wf3h
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
DJT
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Gregory A Greenman
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
DJT
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Davej
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Davej
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Davej
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
wf3h
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
TomS
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
AC
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
VBM
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
AC
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Richard Clayton
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
DJT
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
DJT
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
DJT
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
AC
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Richard Clayton
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
DJT
- Quote-mining Augustine: STOP IT NOW!,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Richard Clayton
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
wf3h
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
DJT
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Lee Jay
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
wf3h
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
AC
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Michael Siemon
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Richard Clayton
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
wf3h
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Cheezits
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Inez
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Rodjk #613
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
VBM
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
coaster
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
shipmodeler1
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
VBM
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Mr D.
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Mr D.
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
noctiluca
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Mr D.
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
noctiluca
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
AC
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Cheezits
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
VBM
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Frank J
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
eerok
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
eroot
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
John McKendry
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
eerok
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
eerok
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
eerok
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Andre Lieven
Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Shane
Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
John Harshman
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
John Harshman
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
John Harshman
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
John Harshman
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
John Harshman
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
eroot
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
eroot
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
wf3h
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Wakboth
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
John McKendry
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
J.J. O'Shea
Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
David Iain Greig
Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Frank J
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
VBM
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
John McKendry
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
John McKendry
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
John McKendry
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
The Last Conformist
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
The Last Conformist
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
John McKendry
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
The Last Conformist
- Message not available
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
The Last Conformist
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
noshellswill
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
John McKendry
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
John McKendry
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
John McKendry
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
snex
- Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
Frank J
Re: Have we become alt.atheism?,
noshellswill
Bobbies Piltdown Meltdown,
mccoy
Piltdown Video,
mccoy
- Re: Piltdown Video,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Piltdown Video,
mccoy
- Re: Piltdown Video,
Martin
- Re: Piltdown Video,
JM20000000
- Re: Re: Piltdown Video,
Ye Old One
- Re: Piltdown Video,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Re: Piltdown Video,
Ye Old One
- Re: Piltdown Video,
raven1
- Re: Re: Piltdown Video,
Ye Old One
- Re: Piltdown Video,
Kermit
- Re: Piltdown Video,
Dan Drake
- Re: Piltdown Video,
Augray
- Re: Piltdown Video,
John Wilkins
- Re: Piltdown Video,
Earle Jones
- Re: Piltdown Video,
Ye Old One
- Re: Piltdown Video,
Inez
- Re: Piltdown Video,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: Piltdown Video,
Inez
- Re: Re: Piltdown Video,
Ye Old One
- Re: Piltdown Video,
Inez
- Chez Watt? (Was: Re: Piltdown Video),
Lee Jay
- Re: Chez Watt? (Was: Re: Piltdown Video),
Martin
- Re: Piltdown Video,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: Re: Piltdown Video,
Ye Old One
- CHEZ WATT Re: Re: Piltdown Video,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: Piltdown Video,
Klaus H
- Re: Piltdown Video,
Jim Willemin
- Re: Piltdown Video,
Klaus H
- Re: Piltdown Video,
Earle Jones
- Re: Re: Piltdown Video,
Ye Old One
- Re: Re: Piltdown Video,
Dan Drake
- Re: Re: Piltdown Video,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Piltdown Video,
John Wilkins
- Re: Piltdown Video,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Piltdown Video,
DJT
- Re: Piltdown Video,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Piltdown Video,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Piltdown Video,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: Piltdown Video,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Piltdown Video,
Free Lunch
- Re: Piltdown Video,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Piltdown Video,
Dan Drake
- Re: Piltdown Video,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Piltdown Video,
Dan Drake
- Re: Piltdown Video,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Piltdown Video,
John Wilkins
- Re: Piltdown Video,
Wakboth
- Re: Piltdown Video,
Thurisaz the Einherjer
In the News: Ben Stein plays the Nazi card,
jspaceman
In the News: Creationists launch 'science' journal,
jspaceman
A question for the group,
VBM
- Re: A question for the group,
snex
- Re: A question for the group,
VBM
- Re: A question for the group,
snex
- Re: A question for the group,
VBM
- Re: A question for the group,
snex
- Re: A question for the group,
Max
- Re: A question for the group,
Nick Keighley
- Re: A question for the group,
Geoff
- Re: A question for the group,
VBM
- Re: A question for the group,
slothrop
- Re: A question for the group,
VBM
- Message not available
- Re: A question for the group,
VBM
- Message not available
- Re: A question for the group,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: A question for the group,
snex
- Re: A question for the group,
VBM
- Re: A question for the group,
snex
- Re: A question for the group,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: A question for the group,
snex
- Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
snex
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Ye Old One
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
snex
- Re: Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Ye Old One
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Bob Reasoner
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Earle Jones
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Bob Reasoner
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Earle Jones
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Bob Reasoner
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Greg G.
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Bob Reasoner
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Earle Jones
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Bob Reasoner
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Ye Old One
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
DJT
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
the heekster
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Free Lunch
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Bob Reasoner
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Bob Reasoner
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Martin Hutton
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Bob Reasoner
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
John Wilkins
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
John Wilkins
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Martin Hutton
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Mr D.
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Sonofagunzel
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Ernest Major
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
wf3h
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
the heekster
- Message not available
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
DJT
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
hersheyh
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
mark
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Jim Willemin
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
mark
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
wf3h
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
Stile4aly
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
mark
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact,
the heekster
- Evolution = Atheism = objective fact.,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact.,
wf3h
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact.,
hersheyh
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact.,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact.,
wf3h
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact.,
macaddicted
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact.,
Kermit
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact.,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact.,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact.,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact.,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact.,
DJT
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact.,
Robert J. Kolker
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact.,
stew dean
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact.,
Greg G.
- Message not available
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact.,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact.,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact.,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact.,
DJT
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact.,
Bob Reasoner
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact.,
wf3h
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact.,
Ralph Page
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact.,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact.,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Evolution = Atheism = objective fact.,
DJT
Re: A question for the group,
VBM
Re: A question for the group,
Walter Bushell
Re: A question for the group,
Tiny Bulcher
Re: A question for the group,
Tiny Bulcher
Re: A question for the group,
Walter Bushell
Re: A question for the group,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
Re: A question for the group,
snex
Re: A question for the group,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
Re: A question for the group,
Bob D
Re: A question for the group,
VBM
Re: A question for the group,
Greg Guarino
Re: A question for the group,
VBM
Re: A question for the group,
SortingItOut
Re: A question for the group,
VBM
Re: A question for the group,
slothrop
Re: A question for the group,
VBM
Message not availableRe: A question for the group,
VBM
Re: A question for the group,
snex
Re: A question for the group,
VBM
Re: A question for the group,
snex
Re: A question for the group,
VBM
Re: A question for the group,
snex
Re: A question for the group,
VBM
Re: A question for the group,
snex
Re: A question for the group,
VBM
Re: A question for the group,
snex
Re: A question for the group,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: A question for the group,
VBM
Re: A question for the group,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
Re: A question for the group,
snex
Re: A question for the group,
Ray Martinez
Re: A question for the group,
Sonofagunzel
Re: A question for the group,
snex
Re: A question for the group,
snex
Re: A question for the group,
snex
Re: A question for the group,
Dana Tweedy
Re: A question for the group,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
Re: A question for the group,
VBM
Re: A question for the group,
snex
Re: A question for the group,
snex
Re: A question for the group,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
Re: A question for the group,
snex
Re: A question for the group,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
Re: A question for the group,
snex
Re: A question for the group,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
Re: A question for the group,
Earle Jones
Re: A question for the group,
VBM
Re: A question for the group,
Mr D.
Re: A question for the group,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: A question for the group,
VBM
- Re: A question for the group,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: A question for the group,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: A question for the group,
VBM
- Re: A question for the group,
snex
- Re: A question for the group,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: A question for the group,
VBM
- Re: A question for the group,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: A question for the group,
Ernest Major
- Re: A question for the group,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: A question for the group,
Ernest Major
- Re: A question for the group,
snex
- Message not available
- Re: A question for the group,
Free Lunch
- Message not available
- Re: A question for the group,
snex
- Re: A question for the group,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: A question for the group,
snex
- Re: A question for the group,
Garamond Lethe
- Message not available
- Re: A question for the group,
John Wilkins
- Re: A question for the group,
TomS
- Re: A question for the group,
Walter Bushell
- Re: A question for the group,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: A question for the group,
Walter Bushell
Re: A question for the group,
VBM
Re: A question for the group,
John Wilkins
Re: A question for the group,
TomS
Re: A question for the group,
John Wilkins
Re: A question for the group,
Walter Bushell
Re: A question for the group,
TomS
Re: A question for the group,
VBM
Message not availableRe: A question for the group,
VBM
Re: A question for the group,
Walter Bushell
Re: A question for the group,
Susan S
Re: A question for the group,
John Wilkins
Re: A question for the group,
Susan S
Re: A question for the group,
John Wilkins
Re: A question for the group,
Kermit
Re: A question for the group,
Walter Bushell
Re: A question for the group,
Andre Lieven
Re: A question for the group,
Walter Bushell
Re: A question for the group,
snex
Re: A question for the group,
VBM
Re: A question for the group,
Steven L.
Re: A question for the group,
VBM
Re: A question for the group,
Mr D.
Re: A question for the group,
John Wilkins
Re: A question for the group,
Michael Siemon
Re: A question for the group,
John Wilkins
Re: A question for the group,
Ray Martinez
Re: A question for the group,
snex
Re: A question for the group,
Klaus H
Re: A question for the group,
Mr D.
Re: A question for the group,
Mr D.
Re: A question for the group,
Tiny Bulcher
Re: A question for the group,
Mr D.
Re: A question for the group,
Tiny Bulcher
Re: A question for the group,
Mr D.
Re: A question for the group,
Tiny Bulcher
Re: A question for the group,
Tiny Bulcher
Re: A question for the group,
John Brockbank
Re: A question for the group,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: A question for the group,
coaster
Re: A question for the group,
chris thompson
Re: A question for the group,
Dr.GH
Re: A question for the group,
Christopher Denney
Re: A question for the group,
John Harshman
- Re: A question for the group,
VBM
- Re: A question for the group,
Ray Martinez
- Re: A question for the group,
VBM
- Re: A question for the group,
Ray Martinez
- Re: A question for the group,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: A question for the group,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: A question for the group,
John Harshman
- Re: A question for the group,
Ray Martinez
- Re: A question for the group,
Klaus H
- Re: A question for the group,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: A question for the group,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: A question for the group,
John Harshman
- Re: A question for the group,
Ray Martinez
- Re: A question for the group,
wf3h
- Re: A question for the group,
John Harshman
- Re: A question for the group,
Ray Martinez
- Re: A question for the group,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: A question for the group,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: A question for the group,
Greg Guarino
- Re: A question for the group,
Earle Jones
Message not available
Re: A question for the group,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
Re: A question for the group,
Sonofagunzel
Re: A question for the group,
Greg G.
Re: A question for the group,
Steven L.
Re: A question for the group,
Dwib
Re: A question for the group,
brogers
Re: A question for the group,
Frank J
Re: A question for the group,
Ron O
Re: A question for the group,
wf3h
Re: A question for the group,
Davej
Creationism and Natural Selection (incompatible?),
Jack
Test for creationism?,
Mr tiktaalik
Stephen Hawking Becomes Born-Again Christian!!!,
DavidMills.Net
News: 'Safe Ebola' created for research.,
Ye Old One
News: Project aims to map DNA of 1,000 people.,
Ye Old One
News: Amazing Old Stars Give Birth Again.,
Ye Old One
News: Hot springs microbes hold key to dating sedimentary rocks.,
Ye Old One
News: Newly discovered active fault building new Dalmatian Islands.,
Ye Old One
A Scientific Theory Of Intelligent Design,
Ptet
The Four Horsemen,
Christopher Denney
Re: The Four Horsemen,
coaster
Re: The Four Horsemen,
Puppet_Sock
Intelligent Design, the clothing line,
jspaceman
- Re: Intelligent Design, the clothing line,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Intelligent Design, the clothing line,
coaster
- Re: Intelligent Design, the clothing line,
Inez
- Re: Intelligent Design, the clothing line,
Conspiracy of Doves
- Re: Intelligent Design, the clothing line,
Mr D.
- Re: Intelligent Design, the clothing line,
John McKendry
- Re: Intelligent Design, the clothing line,
Mr D.
- Re: Intelligent Design, the clothing line,
John McKendry
- Re: Intelligent Design, the clothing line,
noctiluca
- Re: Intelligent Design, the clothing line,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Intelligent Design, the clothing line,
Inez
- Re: Intelligent Design, the clothing line,
John McKendry
- Re: Intelligent Design, the clothing line,
Inez
- Re: Intelligent Design, the clothing line,
Shane
- Re: Intelligent Design, the clothing line,
Cheezits
- Re: Intelligent Design, the clothing line,
The Last Conformist
- Re: Intelligent Design, the clothing line,
allisonki
- Re: Intelligent Design, the clothing line,
AC
- Re: Intelligent Design, the clothing line,
Desertphile
Disapproving,
Glenn
Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Geoff
- POTM post of the month nomination,
geoproc
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
snex
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
geoproc
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
snex
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
geoproc
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
snex
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
VBM
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
snex
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
VBM
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
snex
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
VBM
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
snex
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
VBM
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
snex
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
VBM
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
snex
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
VBM
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
snex
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
Earle Jones
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
AC
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
snex
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
VBM
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
snex
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
AC
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
snex
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
snex
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
snex
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
snex
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
snex
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
snex
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
snex
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
VBM
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
Mr D.
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
Andre Lieven
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
Lee Jay
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
VBM
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
snex
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
Sonofagunzel
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
snex
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
Sonofagunzel
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
snex
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
Sonofagunzel
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
snex
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
Sonofagunzel
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
snex
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
Sonofagunzel
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
snex
- Re: Is the supernatural false, or unfalsifiable?,
Sonofagunzel
- Re: Is the supernatural false, or unfalsifiable?,
snex
- Re: Is the supernatural false, or unfalsifiable?,
Sonofagunzel
- Re: Is the supernatural false, or unfalsifiable?,
snex
- Re: Is the supernatural false, or unfalsifiable?,
Sonofagunzel
- Re: Is the supernatural false, or unfalsifiable?,
snex
- Re: Is the supernatural false, or unfalsifiable?,
Sonofagunzel
- Re: Is the supernatural false, or unfalsifiable?,
snex
- Re: Is the supernatural false, or unfalsifiable?,
snex
- Re: Is the supernatural false, or unfalsifiable?,
snex
- Re: Is the supernatural false, or unfalsifiable?,
Sonofagunzel
- Re: Is the supernatural false, or unfalsifiable?,
snex
- Re: Is the supernatural false, or unfalsifiable?,
Sonofagunzel
- Re: Is the supernatural false, or unfalsifiable?,
snex
- Re: Is the supernatural false, or unfalsifiable?,
Sonofagunzel
- Re: Is the supernatural false, or unfalsifiable?,
Timberwoof
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
Sonofagunzel
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
AC
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
Nick Keighley
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
louann_m@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
VBM
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
Mr D.
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
eroot
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
the heekster
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
Puppet_Sock
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
Nick Keighley
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
geoproc
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
Nick Keighley
- A bit of a Rant. please read [Was Re: POTM post of the month nomination],
VBM
- Re: A bit of a Rant. please read [Was Re: POTM post of the month,
Steven L.
- Re: A bit of a Rant. please read [Was Re: POTM post of the month,
VBM
- Re: A bit of a Rant. please read [Was Re: POTM post of the month,
Steven L.
- Re: A bit of a Rant. please read [Was Re: POTM post of the month,
snex
- Re: A bit of a Rant. please read [Was Re: POTM post of the month,
Mr D.
- Re: A bit of a Rant. please read [Was Re: POTM post of the month,
snex
- Re: A bit of a Rant. please read [Was Re: POTM post of the month,
VBM
- Re: A bit of a Rant. please read [Was Re: POTM post of the month,
Rodjk #613
- Re: A bit of a Rant. please read [Was Re: POTM post of the month,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: A bit of a Rant. please read [Was Re: POTM post of the month,
Martin Hutton
- Re: A bit of a Rant. please read [Was Re: POTM post of the month nomination],
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: A bit of a Rant. please read [Was Re: POTM post of the month nomination],
VBM
- Re: A bit of a Rant. please read [Was Re: POTM post of the month nomination],
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: A bit of a Rant. please read [Was Re: POTM post of the month nomination],
VBM
- Re: A bit of a Rant. please read [Was Re: POTM post of the month,
slothrop
- Re: A bit of a Rant. please read [Was Re: POTM post of the month,
VBM
- Re: A bit of a Rant. please read [Was Re: POTM post of the month,
Earle Jones
- Re: A bit of a Rant. please read [Was Re: POTM post of the month,
Andre Lieven
- Re: A bit of a Rant. please read [Was Re: POTM post of the month,
VBM
- Re: A bit of a Rant. please read [Was Re: POTM post of the month,
Earle Jones
- POTM post of the month nomination - rejected.,
Ray Martinez
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination - rejected.,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination - rejected.,
Earle Jones
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination - rejected.,
Ray Martinez
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination - rejected.,
ebataitis
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination - rejected.,
Shane
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination - rejected.,
Thurisaz the Einherjer
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination - rejected.,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination - rejected.,
Earle Jones
- Message not available
- Re: Seconding the nomination (was Re: A bit of a Rant. please read),
VBM
- Re: A bit of a Rant. please read [Was Re: POTM post of the month nomination],
Gerry Murphy
- Re: A bit of a Rant. please read [Was Re: POTM post of the month,
Nick Keighley
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination - seconding,
Wakboth
- Re: POTM post of the month nomination,
max maypo
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
John Harshman
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Treus
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Ernest Major
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Ye Old One
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Jim Willemin
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Ye Old One
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
geoproc
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Ye Old One
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
DJT
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Mr D.
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Cheezits
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
AC
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
DJT
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Andre Lieven
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
James Goetz
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
James Goetz
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
James Goetz
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Andre Lieven
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Nick Keighley
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Andre Lieven
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Mark Isaak
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
AC
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Treus
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Treus
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Treus
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Treus
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Treus
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Treus
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Treus
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Treus
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Treus
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Treus
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Treus
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
AC
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Treus
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
AC
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Treus
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Treus
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
AC
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Treus
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
AC
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Treus
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
richardalanforrest
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
JohnN
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Bob Casanova
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Lee Jay
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Lee Jay
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Lee Jay
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
geoproc
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Lee Jay
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Lee Jay
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Lee Jay
- Re: Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Ye Old One
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Cheezits
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
louann_m@xxxxxxxxx
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
JohnN
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
sasam2
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Greg G.
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
slothrop
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
louann_m@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
louann_m@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Treus
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
louann_m@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Rodjk #613
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
louann_m@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Treus
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Treus
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Treus
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Treus
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
AC
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
slothrop
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Treus
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
slothrop
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
slothrop
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
AC
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
AC
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Klaus H
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Vend
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Vend
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Andre Lieven
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Jack
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
VBM
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Sonofagunzel
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Sonofagunzel
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Sonofagunzel
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Sonofagunzel
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
snex
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Vend
- Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Timberwoof
Re: Where we Christians too often get it wrong,
Kermit
News: Studies highlight MRSA evolution and resilience.,
Ye Old One
VID: Kent Hovind appears to have had an epiphany.,
Ye Old One
Does anyone want to take credit for this, I got it here but don't have the poster,
VBM
So why don't we have our own?,
Elf M. Sternberg
More evidence of Noah's Flood,
James Goetz
How are you going to vote?,
Earle Jones
Quote in favor of Darwinian evolution and against Behe's bogus beliefs,
Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
There was a good article on the history behind this "information" argument . . .,
VBM
News: Platypus older than thought,
phillip brown
Trying to get the fossil record in proportion,
Jenny Brien
Re: What killed the dinosaurs?,
Mr tiktaalik
If people's brains ignored unpleasant things,
Puppet_Sock
The tide has turned!,
Paul Ciszek
Top 100 christian views on evolution...,
Mr tiktaalik
Ben Stein: 'Big Science' in America is Killing 1st Amendment,
jspaceman
- Re: Ben Stein: 'Big Science' in America is Killing 1st Amendment,
Lee Jay
- Re: Ben Stein: 'Big Science' in America is Killing 1st Amendment,
Inez
- Re: Ben Stein: 'Big Science' in America is Killing 1st Amendment,
Free Lunch
- Re: Ben Stein: 'Big Science' in America is Killing 1st Amendment,
Rodjk #613
- Re: Ben Stein: 'Big Science' in America is Killing 1st Amendment,
Conspiracy of Doves
- Re: Ben Stein: 'Big Science' in America is Killing 1st Amendment,
Dag Yo
- Re: Ben Stein: 'Big Science' in America is Killing 1st Amendment,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Ben Stein: 'Big Science' in America is Killing 1st Amendment,
Tom McDonald
- Re: Ben Stein: 'Big Science' in America is Killing 1st Amendment,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Ben Stein: 'Big Science' in America is Killing 1st Amendment,
Daniel Kolle
- Re: Ben Stein: 'Big Science' in America is Killing 1st Amendment,
Desertphile
VID: How Evolution REALLY Works.,
Ye Old One
Evolution and Natural Selection: An overly simplified introduction,
Dag Yo
Re: RationalWiki,
Robert Carnegie
Commentary: The real danger in Darwin is not evolution, but racism,
Jason Spaceman
- Re: Commentary: The real danger in Darwin is not evolution, but,
John Harshman
- Re: Commentary: The real danger in Darwin is not evolution, but,
Bodega
- Re: Commentary: The real danger in Darwin is not evolution, but,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Commentary: The real danger in Darwin is not evolution, but racism,
David Hare-Scott
- Re: Commentary: The real danger in Darwin is not evolution, but,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Commentary: The real danger in Darwin is not evolution, but,
louann_m@xxxxxxxxx
- Message not available
- Re: Commentary: The real danger in Darwin is not evolution, but,
Frank J
- Message not available
- Re: Commentary: The real danger in Darwin is not evolution, but,
JohnN
- Re: Commentary: The real danger in Darwin is not evolution, but,
Dr.GH
Commentary: Don't stifle the debate on Darwin's deficiencies,
Jason Spaceman
Re: News: Blonde Ambition: Iconic Blondes Shape History.,
Vend
News: Scottish Insight Into the Woolliness of Evolution.,
Ye Old One
News: Weeds flourish as climate changes and provides a speedy view of evolution in action.,
Ye Old One
Who is missing?,
Ye Old One
Hovind supporter lied about YouTube video,
Desertphile
The New Theology - Chicago Trib Magazine - 1/20/08,
RAM
Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
John Harshman
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
TomS
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Ron O
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
John Harshman
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Ben Standeven
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
John Wilkins
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
John Harshman
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
John Wilkins
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
James Goetz
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
John Wilkins
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
James Goetz
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Nic
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Ron O
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
John Harshman
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Ron O
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
John Harshman
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
The Last Conformist
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
John Harshman
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Ron O
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
The Last Conformist
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
John Wilkins
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Dan Drake
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
John Harshman
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Dan Drake
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Dan Drake
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
John Wilkins
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
John Wilkins
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Augray
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
John Harshman
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
John Harshman
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
John Harshman
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
John Harshman
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
John Wilkins
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
John Harshman
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
John Wilkins
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
John Harshman
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Martin Hutton
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
John Wilkins
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
John Wilkins
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Susan S
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
John Harshman
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
_Arthur
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
_Arthur
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
John Harshman
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Max
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
The Last Conformist
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
The Last Conformist
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
noctiluca
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
John Harshman
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
John Harshman
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
John Harshman
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
John McKendry
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
John Harshman
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Frank J
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Frank J
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
John Harshman
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Augray
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Frank J
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Vend
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Frank J
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Dustan
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
AC
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
hersheyh
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
James Goetz
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Tim Tyler
- Re: Toward a scientific theory of intelligent design,
Nic
What is Naturalistic?,
mccoy
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
Thurisaz the Einherjer
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
mccoy
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
Thurisaz the Einherjer
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
A.Carlson
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
mccoy
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
mccoy
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
A.Carlson
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
mccoy
- Re: Re: What is Naturalistic?,
Ye Old One
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
Earle Jones
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
raven1
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
A.Carlson
- Re: Re: What is Naturalistic?,
Ye Old One
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Re: What is Naturalistic?,
Ye Old One
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
A.Carlson
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
Martin Hutton
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
Earle Jones
- Re: Re: What is Naturalistic?,
Ye Old One
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
AC
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
Grandbank
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
Greg G.
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
Ye Old One
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
gruebait
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
Homer Sapiens
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
mccoy
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
mccoy
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
Wombat
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
Wakboth
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
mccoy
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
raven1
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
mccoy
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
A.Carlson
- Re: Re: What is Naturalistic?,
Ye Old One
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
raven1
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
Inez
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
Kermit
- Re: Re: What is Naturalistic?,
Ye Old One
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
Wakboth
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
Augray
- Re: Re: What is Naturalistic?,
Ye Old One
- Re: Re: What is Naturalistic?,
Ye Old One
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
mccoy
- Re: Re: What is Naturalistic?,
Ye Old One
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
Wakboth
- Re: Re: What is Naturalistic?,
Ye Old One
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
Earle Jones
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
raven1
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
Inez
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
Denis Loubet
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
the heekster
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
wf3h
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
hhyapster
- Re: What is Naturalistic?,
snex
Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
backspace
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Ron O
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
geoproc
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
backspace
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Grandbank
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
backspace
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Greg G.
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Grandbank
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Greg G.
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Greg G.
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Michael Siemon
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
TomS
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
geoproc
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
backspace
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
backspace
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Bill Hudson
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
hersheyh
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
backspace
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
hersheyh
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
hersheyh
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Grandbank
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
hersheyh
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
John Bode
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Woland
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
backspace
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Bill Hudson
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
backspace
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Bill Hudson
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
backspace
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Woland
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Woland
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
wf3h
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Ernest Major
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
hersheyh
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
hersheyh
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
wf3h
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Woland
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
backspace
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
hersheyh
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
backspace
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
backspace
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Woland
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Inez
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
backspace
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Woland
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
backspace
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Woland
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
hersheyh
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
wf3h
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
David Hare-Scott
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
wf3h
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Puppet_Sock
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
backspace
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Woland
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Woland
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
backspace
- Re: Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Ye Old One
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
backspace
- Re: Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Ye Old One
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Harry K
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
hersheyh
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Harry K
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Woland
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Inez
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
backspace
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
wf3h
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
hersheyh
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
noshellswill
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
wf3h
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
noshellswill
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
wf3h
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
wf3h
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
chris thompson
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
noshellswill
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
chris thompson
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
noshellswill
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
chris thompson
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
noshellswill
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
RAM
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
chris thompson
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Greg Guarino
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
backspace
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Woland
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
chris thompson
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Greg Guarino
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
wf3h
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
SortingItOut
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
backspace
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured,
ebataitis
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Ye Old One
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
backspace
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Woland
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
wf3h
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
backspace
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
Woland
- Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?,
SortingItOut
New Hands,
Glenn
Re: Rush Limbaugh Humor: 2 Adult Beverage Recipes Any Dittohead Will,
Inez
Re: John Schroeder's book, "Why Monkeys Are Monkeys...",
eroot
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: John Schroeder's book, "Why Monkeys Are Monkeys...",
Greg G.
- Re: John Schroeder's book, "Why Monkeys Are Monkeys...",
Ron O
- Re: John Schroeder's book, "Why Monkeys Are Monkeys...",
Dick C
- Re: John Schroeder's book, "Why Monkeys Are Monkeys...",
Christopher Denney
- Re: John Schroeder's book, "Why Monkeys Are Monkeys...",
wf3h
- Re: John Schroeder's book, "Why Monkeys Are Monkeys...",
The Last Conformist
Chez Watt: Re: John Schroeder's book, "Why Monkeys Are Monkeys...",
Vend
OT Georgia Guidestones,
Terry
Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
Jason Spaceman
- Why I Am A Fundy*** Head (Was; Re: Commentary: ),
Andre Lieven
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
Vend
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
A.Carlson
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
Dick C
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
snex
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
snex
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
Vend
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
snex
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
Max
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
snex
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
Vend
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
snex
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
Vend
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
John McKendry
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
snex
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
John Wilkins
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
Kent
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
Earle Jones
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
Mr D.
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
JohnN
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
MRB
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
snex
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
MRB
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
snex
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
Vend
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
snex
- Re: Commentary: The closed minds of today's intellectuals,
wf3h
Brains alone,
Walter Bushell
test,
Glenn
So how did the Behe Day celebration go?,
Frank J
ReNew America: "Darwin Day" coming to a school near you,
Jason Spaceman
Cool videos,
Ferrous Patella
The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
knowwearman
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Andre Lieven
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
RichD
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ye Old One
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Andre Lieven
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
wf3h
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Kermit
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ray Martinez
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
raven1
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ye Old One
- Explaining the difference between Science and Scientism,
Ray Martinez
- Chez Watt! nomination (was Re: Explaining the difference between Science and Scientism),
raven1
- Re: Explaining the difference between Science and Scientism,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: Explaining the difference between Science and Scientism,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Explaining the difference between Science and Scientism,
Ye Old One
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Andre Lieven
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Greg G.
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Thurisaz the Einherjer
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
EnlightenedSoul
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Thurisaz the Einherjer
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Andre Lieven
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ray Martinez
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
DJT
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Thurisaz the Einherjer
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
The Last Conformist
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
wf3h
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ray Martinez
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Free Lunch
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ken Denny
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Free Lunch
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ken Denny
- Re: Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ye Old One
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ken Denny
- Re: Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ye Old One
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
the heekster
- Re: Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ye Old One
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ken Denny
- Re: Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ye Old One
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ken Denny
- Re: Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ye Old One
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
the heekster
- Re: Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ye Old One
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ken Denny
- Re: Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ye Old One
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
the heekster
- Re: Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ye Old One
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Shane
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Free Lunch
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
the heekster
- Re: Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ye Old One
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
the heekster
- Re: Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ye Old One
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ken Denny
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
chris thompson
- Re: Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ye Old One
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ken Denny
- Re: Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ye Old One
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ken Denny
- Re: Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ye Old One
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Woland
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Free Lunch
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ken Denny
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Free Lunch
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
wf3h
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
the heekster
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
wf3h
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
the heekster
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
wf3h
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Free Lunch
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Walter Bushell
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ken Denny
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
wf3h
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
the heekster
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
wf3h
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
the heekster
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Walter Bushell
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
the heekster
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Free Lunch
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ken Denny
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Free Lunch
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Free Lunch
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ken Denny
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
chris thompson
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
the heekster
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
wf3h
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Free Lunch
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ken Denny
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Free Lunch
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Walter Bushell
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ken Denny
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Free Lunch
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
the heekster
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
wf3h
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Woland
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Walter Bushell
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
chris thompson
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Greg G.
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ray Martinez
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
snex
- Re: Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ye Old One
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
raven1
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Dick C.
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Greg G.
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
wf3h
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Wakboth
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Vend
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ron O
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Frank J
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Inez
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
wf3h
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
raven1
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ray Martinez
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Elmer
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ray Martinez
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Free Lunch
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Elmer
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Free Lunch
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ray Martinez
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Free Lunch
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ye Old One
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Free Lunch
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ray Martinez
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ben Standeven
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
eroot
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Cj
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
the heekster
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
the heekster
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
eroot
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Ray Martinez
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Tom McDonald
- The Sands of Time Do Not Lie: faith based on facts,
Ray Martinez
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie: faith based on facts,
Ye Old One
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie: faith based on facts,
raven1
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie: faith based on facts,
DJT
- Chez Watt,
DJT
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie: faith based on facts,
ebataitis
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie: faith based on facts,
Ray Martinez
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie: faith based on facts,
Free Lunch
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie: faith based on facts,
Elmer
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie: faith based on facts,
Ray Martinez
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie: faith based on facts,
Elmer
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie: faith based on facts,
Tom McDonald
- CHEZ WATT Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie: faith based on facts,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie: faith based on facts,
the heekster
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie: faith based on facts,
wf3h
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie: faith based on facts,
raven1
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Free Lunch
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Earle Jones
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Frank J
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Frank J
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
eroot
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
snex
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
SkyEyes
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Marc L.
- Re: The Sands of Time Do Not Lie...,
Davej
what those candidates said...,
Mr D.
Theologian links evolution to Christ in 'Chance or Purpose',
Homer Sapiens
Are 2 John Wilkins too many?,
macaddicted
- Re: Are 2 John Wilkins too many?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Are 2 John Wilkins too many?,
Inez
- Re: Are 2 John Wilkins too many?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Are 2 John Wilkins too many?,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Are 2 John Wilkins too many?,
Shane
- Re: Are 2 John Wilkins too many?,
James Goetz
- Re: Are 2 John Wilkins too many?,
Dr.GH
- Re: Are 2 John Wilkins too many?,
Gary Bohn
- Re: Are 2 John Wilkins too many?,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Are 2 John Wilkins too many?,
Inez
- Re: Are 2 John Wilkins too many?,
Vend
- Re: Are 2 John Wilkins too many?,
Inez
- Re: Are 2 John Wilkins too many?,
Vend
- Re: Are 2 John Wilkins too many?,
Dan Drake
- Re: Are 2 John Wilkins too many?,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Are 2 John Wilkins too many?,
Jenny Brien
- Re: Are 2 John Wilkins too many?,
The Last Conformist
- Re: Are 2 John Wilkins too many?,
Stuart
- Re: Are 2 John Wilkins too many?,
John Stockwell
- Re: Are 2 John Wilkins too many?,
Greg G.
- Re: Are 2 John Wilkins too many?,
Woland
UltraAtheist: Computer viruses don't need a creator,
mccoy
- Re: UltraAtheist: Computer viruses don't need a creator,
snex
- Re: UltraAtheist: Computer viruses don't need a creator,
mccoy
- Re: UltraAtheist: Computer viruses don't need a creator,
snex
- Re: UltraAtheist: Computer viruses don't need a creator,
Mr D.
- Re: UltraAtheist: Computer viruses don't need a creator,
Kermit
- Re: UltraAtheist: Computer viruses don't need a creator,
mccoy
- Re: UltraAtheist: Computer viruses don't need a creator,
Dustan
- Re: Re: UltraAtheist: Computer viruses don't need a creator,
Ye Old One
- Re: UltraAtheist: Computer viruses don't need a creator,
Earle Jones
- Re: UltraAtheist: Computer viruses don't need a creator,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: UltraAtheist: Computer viruses don't need a creator,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Re: UltraAtheist: Computer viruses don't need a creator,
Ye Old One
- Re: UltraAtheist: Computer viruses don't need a creator,
Inez
- Re: UltraAtheist: Computer viruses don't need a creator,
raven1
- Re: UltraAtheist: Computer viruses don't need a creator,
Prof Weird
- Re: UltraAtheist: Computer viruses don't need a creator,
AC
- Re: UltraAtheist: Computer viruses don't need a creator,
Ye Old One
- Re: UltraAtheist: Computer viruses don't need a creator,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: UltraAtheist: Computer viruses don't need a creator,
Dustan
- Public Service Announcement Re: UltraAtheist: Computer viruses,
John McKendry
What the ID People Have Wrought,
Elf M. Sternberg
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Kermit
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Inez
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Evopeach
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Lee Jay
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Evopeach
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Inez
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Evopeach
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Inez
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Walter Bushell
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Lee Jay
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Inez
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Lee Jay
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Inez
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Lee Jay
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Inez
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Walter Bushell
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Inez
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Evopeach
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Inez
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
wf3h
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Evopeach
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Inez
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
louann_m@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
John Wilkins
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Walter Bushell
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Inez
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
wf3h
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Earle Jones
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
the heekster
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Evopeach
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Elf M. Sternberg
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Evopeach
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
wf3h
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Evopeach
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Free Lunch
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Kermit
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
eroot
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
wf3h
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
eroot
- Re: Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Ye Old One
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
RAM
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Ray Martinez
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Ray Martinez
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
snex
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Lee Jay
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Evopeach
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
wf3h
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Evopeach
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
RAM
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
wf3h
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Lee Jay
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Elmer
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Elf M. Sternberg
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
wf3h
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Cj
- Re: What the ID People Have Wrought,
Ron O
What instrument? Intelligence required,
mccoy
- Re: What instrument? Intelligence required,
ebataitis
- Re: What instrument? Intelligence required,
Inez
- Re: What instrument? Intelligence required,
stevedholl
- Re: What instrument? Intelligence required,
Vend
- Re: What instrument? Intelligence required,
Ernest Major
- Re: What instrument? Intelligence required,
Ouroboros_Rex
- Re: What instrument? Intelligence required,
Ferrous Patella
- Re: What instrument? Intelligence required,
Prof Weird
- Re: What instrument? Intelligence required,
raven1
- Re: What instrument? Intelligence required,
Ye Old One
- Re: What instrument? Intelligence required,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: What instrument? Intelligence required,
Mr D.
- Re: What instrument? Intelligence required,
Treus
- Re: What instrument? Intelligence required,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: What instrument? Intelligence required,
mccoy
- Re: Re: What instrument? Intelligence required,
Ye Old One
- Re: What instrument? Intelligence required,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: What instrument? Intelligence required,
raven1
- Re: Re: What instrument? Intelligence required,
Ye Old One
- Re: What instrument? Intelligence required,
Stuart
- Re: What instrument? Intelligence required,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: What instrument? Intelligence required,
Free Lunch
- Re: What instrument? Intelligence required,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: What instrument? Intelligence required,
Free Lunch
- Re: What instrument? Intelligence required,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: What instrument? Intelligence required,
John Wilkins
- Re: What instrument? Intelligence required,
Free Lunch
- Re: What instrument? Intelligence required,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: What instrument? Intelligence required,
John Wilkins
- Re: What instrument? Intelligence required,
Free Lunch
- Re: What instrument? Intelligence required,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: What instrument? Intelligence required,
wf3h
- Re: What instrument? Intelligence required,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: What instrument? Intelligence required,
SkyEyes
- Re: What instrument? Intelligence required,
Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)
Re: Ah, those charitable believers...,
Danwood
A good article about how science can tell us who we are and where we,
dali_70
- Re: A good article about how science can tell us who we are and where,
slothrop
- Re: A good article about how science can tell us who we are and where,
noctiluca
- Re: A good article about how science can tell us who we are and where,
John Wilkins
- Re: A good article about how science can tell us who we are and where,
Ron O
- Re: A good article about how science can tell us who we are and,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: A good article about how science can tell us who we are and,
Ron O
- Re: Re: A good article about how science can tell us who we are and,
Ye Old One
- Re: A good article about how science can tell us who we are and,
noctiluca
- Re: Re: A good article about how science can tell us who we are and,
Ye Old One
- Re: A good article about how science can tell us who we are and,
dali_70
- Re: A good article about how science can tell us who we are and,
dali_70
- Re: A good article about how science can tell us who we are and,
Free Lunch
- Re: A good article about how science can tell us who we are and where,
the heekster
From DNA to Survivability,
Michael Altarriba
I need a physics/geology geek -- debris wave speeds,
louann_m@xxxxxxxxx
Only The Fool (read numb-scull atheist) believes in evolution,
No One
Creationist museum auctioning mastodon skull,
George
Evolutionism and Recapitulation,
mccoy
Re: Hell Explained by a Chemistry Student,
hhyapster
You're assuming that things were the same back then!,
killerlimpet
- Re: You're assuming that things were the same back then!,
snex
- Re: You're assuming that things were the same back then!,
Inez
- Re: You're assuming that things were the same back then!,
AC
- Re: You're assuming that things were the same back then!,
r norman
- Re: You're assuming that things were the same back then!,
Jim Willemin
- Re: You're assuming that things were the same back then!,
chris thompson
- Re: You're assuming that things were the same back then!,
Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)
- Re: You're assuming that things were the same back then!,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: You're assuming that things were the same back then!,
Bill Morse
- Re: You're assuming that things were the same back then!,
Gregory A Greenman
- Re: You're assuming that things were the same back then!,
richardalanforrest
- Re: You're assuming that things were the same back then!,
Greg G.
- Re: You're assuming that things were the same back then!,
Kermit
Your Inner Fish,
chris thompson
- Re: Your Inner Fish,
Greg G.
- Re: Your Inner Fish,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Your Inner Fish,
Ralph
- Re: Your Inner Fish,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Your Inner Fish,
Greg G.
- Re: Your Inner Fish,
chris thompson
- Re: Your Inner Fish,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Your Inner Fish,
Noelie S. Alito
- Re: Your Inner Fish,
Greg G.
- Re: Your Inner Fish,
SkyEyes
- Re: Your Inner Fish,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Your Inner Fish,
John Wilkins
- Re: Your Inner Fish,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Your Inner Fish,
John Wilkins
- Re: Your Inner Fish,
Bill Morse
- Re: Your Inner Fish,
TomS
- Re: Your Inner Fish,
John Wilkins
- Re: Your Inner Fish,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Your Inner Fish,
Ralph
- Re: Your Inner Fish,
Jenny Brien
- Re: Your Inner Fish,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Your Inner Fish,
Ron O
- Re: Your Inner Fish,
Jeffrey Turner
- Re: Your Inner Fish,
username_not_found
- Re: Your Inner Fish,
Cj
- Re: Your Inner Fish,
Jeffrey Turner
- Re: Your Inner Fish,
slothrop
Stein: Cells might be intelligent,
Glend
Re: Stein: Cells might be intelligent,
Frank J
Re: Stein: Cells might be intelligent,
Glenn
Re: Stein: Cells might be intelligent,
Craig T
Ex-pastor driven to tout evolution,
Homer Sapiens
Colorado: Creationist warned to stop death threats,
jspaceman
ReNewAmerica: Another loony theory from the wonderland of evolution,
jspaceman
tedium of creationist debate - Galileo,
Mr tiktaalik
"Genesis Flood",
Joe Cummings
Post of the Month revived,
John Wilkins
OT: It was 30 years ago today. . .,
Jason Spaceman
Admin - what about this Fnord thing then,
Robert Carnegie
Re: Admin - what about this Fnord thing then,
Robert Carnegie
Re: Admin - what about this Fnord thing then,
Glenn
Re: Admin - what about this Fnord thing then,
Inez
Re: Admin - what about this Fnord thing then,
Kent Paul Dolan
Re: Admin - what about this Fnord thing then,
David Hare-Scott
Re: Admin - what about this Fnord thing then,
Inez
Re: Admin - what about this Fnord thing then,
Jim Willemin
Re: Admin - what about this Fnord thing then,
gregwrld
Re: Admin - what about this Fnord thing then,
Inez
Re: Admin - what about this Fnord thing then,
gregwrld
Re: Admin - what about this Fnord thing then,
David Iain Greig
Speghetti Conspiracy,
mccoy
OT: U.S. Education Crisis -- part 2,
dkomo
new giant rodent fun news,
Mr tiktaalik
The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
mccoy
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
mccoy
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
John Wilkins
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
mccoy
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
John Wilkins
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Rupert Morrish
- Re: Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Ye Old One
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Ernest Major
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
David Canzi -- non-mailable
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
George
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Rodjk #613
- Re: Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Ye Old One
- Re: Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Ilas
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Greg G.
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Ilas
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Greg G.
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
raven1
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
mccoy
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Inez
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
raven1
- Re: Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Ye Old One
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Inez
- Re: Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Ye Old One
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Will in New Haven
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Dick C
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Inez
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
mccoy
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Dana Tweedy
- No Evidence for Protocell Given,
mccoy
- Re: No Evidence for Protocell Given,
Ernest Major
- Re: No Evidence for Protocell Given,
hhyapster
- Re: No Evidence for Protocell Given,
Ye Old One
- Re: No Evidence for Protocell Given,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: No Evidence for Protocell Given,
mccoy
- Re: No Evidence for Protocell Given,
Robert Weldon
- Re: No Evidence for Protocell Given,
Glenn
- Re: No Evidence for Protocell Given,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: No Evidence for Protocell Given,
mccoy
- Re: Re: No Evidence for Protocell Given,
Ye Old One
- Re: No Evidence for Protocell Given,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: No Evidence for Protocell Given,
mccoy
- Re: Re: No Evidence for Protocell Given,
Ye Old One
- Re: No Evidence for Protocell Given,
raven1
- Re: No Evidence for Protocell Given,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: No Evidence for Protocell Given,
Shane
- Re: No Evidence for Protocell Given,
mccoy
- Re: No Evidence for Protocell Given,
Rupert Morrish
- Re: No Evidence for Protocell Given,
mccoy
- Re: No Evidence for Protocell Given,
Rupert Morrish
- Re: No Evidence for Protocell Given,
mccoy
- Re: No Evidence for Protocell Given,
raven1
- Re: Re: No Evidence for Protocell Given,
Ye Old One
- Re: No Evidence for Protocell Given,
Patashu0
- Re: No Evidence for Protocell Given,
A.Carlson
- Re: Re: No Evidence for Protocell Given,
Ye Old One
- Re: No Evidence for Protocell Given,
Vend
- Re: No Evidence for Protocell Given,
Shane
- Re: Re: No Evidence for Protocell Given,
Ye Old One
- Re: No Evidence for Protocell Given,
Will in New Haven
- Re: Re: No Evidence for Protocell Given,
Ye Old One
- Re: No Evidence for Protocell Given,
raven1
- Re: No Evidence for Protocell Given,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: Re: No Evidence for Protocell Given,
Ye Old One
- Re: No Evidence for Protocell Given,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Ye Old One
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
mccoy
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Robert Weldon
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Inez
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
raven1
- Re: Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Ye Old One
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
mccoy
- Re: Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Ye Old One
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Ye Old One
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
raven1
- Re: Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Ye Old One
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Free Lunch
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Ye Old One
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Bob Casanova
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Kent Paul Dolan
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Rupert Morrish
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Martin
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
traveller
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Ye Old One
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
raven1
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Inez
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Prof Weird
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Vend
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Wakboth
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Bob Casanova
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
John Bode
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Earle Jones
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Davej
- Re: The first swimming Speghettironi protocell,
Faux_Pseudo
Apology Accepted,
knowwearman
- Re: Apology Accepted,
Homer Sapiens
- Re: Apology Accepted,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Apology Accepted,
Glenn
- Re: Apology Accepted,
hhyapster
- Re: Apology Accepted,
The Enigmatic One
- Re: Apology Accepted,
David Hare-Scott
- Re: Apology Accepted,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Apology Accepted,
Cheezits
- Re: Apology Accepted,
Ye Old One
- Re: Apology Accepted,
Inez
- Re: Apology Accepted,
Dick C
- Re: Apology Accepted,
Greg G.
- Re: Apology Accepted,
raven1
- Re: Apology Accepted,
Harry K
- Re: Apology Accepted,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Apology Accepted,
AC
- Re: Apology Accepted,
AC
- Re: Apology Accepted,
Vend
- Message not available
- Re: Apology Accepted,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Apology Accepted,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Apology Accepted,
Earle Jones
- Re: Apology Accepted,
Desertphile
- Re: Apology Accepted,
David Iain Greig
Kent Hovind sings "Federal Prison Blues",
Desertphile
A Designer Universe? by Steven Weinberg,
Andre Lieven
How to sell tickets to a worthless "movie" like Expelled,
Glend
Miracle examples?,
Dick
- Re: Miracle examples?,
snex
- Re: Miracle examples?,
chris thompson
- Re: Miracle examples?,
Kermit
- Re: Miracle examples?,
Thurisaz the Einherjer
- Re: Miracle examples?,
Cheezits
- Re: Miracle examples?,
John Stockwell
- Re: Miracle examples?,
Bob D
- Re: Miracle examples?,
Geoff
- Re: Miracle examples?,
Inez
- Re: Miracle examples?,
Ouroboros_Rex
- Re: Miracle examples?,
Robert Weldon
- Re: Miracle examples?,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Miracle examples?,
William Wingstedt
- Re: Miracle examples?,
Desertphile
- Re: Miracle examples?,
Shane
- Re: Miracle examples?,
David Hare-Scott
- Re: Miracle examples?,
Earle Jones
- Re: Miracle examples?,
Dick
- Re: Miracle examples?,
dkomo
- Re: Miracle examples?,
Dwib
- Re: Miracle examples?,
Dwib
Florida: Lawyer says school proposal equates evolution, religion,
jspaceman
- Re: Florida: Lawyer says school proposal equates evolution, religion,
AC
- Re: Florida: Lawyer says school proposal equates evolution, religion,
snex
- Re: Florida: Lawyer says school proposal equates evolution, religion,
Geoff
- Re: Florida: Lawyer says school proposal equates evolution, religion,
JohnN
- Re: Florida: Lawyer says school proposal equates evolution, religion,
Ferrous Patella
- Re: Florida: Lawyer says school proposal equates evolution, religion,
Ron O
- Re: Florida: Lawyer says school proposal equates evolution, religion,
Ferrous Patella
- Re: Florida: Lawyer says school proposal equates evolution, religion,
Ron O
- Re: Florida: Lawyer says school proposal equates evolution, religion,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Florida: Lawyer says school proposal equates evolution, religion,
Ron O
- Re: Florida: Lawyer says school proposal equates evolution, religion,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Florida: Lawyer says school proposal equates evolution, religion,
Desertphile
- Re: Florida: Lawyer says school proposal equates evolution, religion,
Desertphile
- Re: Florida: Lawyer says school proposal equates evolution, religion,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Florida: Lawyer says school proposal equates evolution, religion,
catshark
- Re: Florida: Lawyer says school proposal equates evolution, religion,
Stile4aly
supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
Chris Krolczyk
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
Inez
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
Earle Jones
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
Bob D
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
Ken Denny
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
Inez
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
Andre Lieven
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
Mike L
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
Inez
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
Vend
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
Shane
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
Vend
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
Mr tiktaalik
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
Mike L
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
Vend
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
Bob D
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
Mike L
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
SkyEyes
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
eerok
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
Mr D.
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
Kermit
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
Jenny Brien
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
SkyEyes
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
Tom McDonald
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
Walter Bushell
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
chris thompson
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
SkyEyes
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
Inez
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
chris thompson
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
stew dean
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
wf3h
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
Frank J
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
Desertphile
- Re: supporters of Dawkins overwhelmingly support Democrats,
Slimebot McGoo
Science Times: Sightless Parent Fish Dont Produce Just Sightless Hybrids,
Greg Guarino
AiG put up a new online "peer-reviewed" journal! LOL,
LT
Re: AiG put up a new online "peer-reviewed" journal! LOL,
slothrop
Re: AiG put up a new online "peer-reviewed" journal! LOL,
Craig T
Re: AiG put up a new online "peer-reviewed" journal! LOL,
Earle Jones
Re: AiG put up a new online "peer-reviewed" journal! LOL,
Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)
Re: AiG put up a new online "peer-reviewed" journal! LOL,
Walter Bushell
Evolution of Vertebrate Eye,
r norman
Re: Invulnerable logic [Was:Re: How Our Brains Ignore Unpleasant,
Evopeach
Could the Theory of Evolution be rediscovered?,
Rupert Morrish
The Case For Christ - review,
internet
Truth or Consequences,
Glenn
Question: Interbreeding vs. Separate Species,
Steven L.
Another Comet, Another Extinction - Humans Exonerated?,
Jeffrey Turner
News: Dino sex: Mrs. T. rex you've got a lovely daughter.,
Ye Old One
Evolution book event,
JTEM
The Full Spectrum of Beliefs on Origins,
VBM
Hilarious angry brit on Creationism :) Great vid!,
LT
In the news: Utah site yields bounty of dinosaur tracks,
Chris Rohrer
In the news: Scientists study connections between tectonics, human,
Chris Rohrer
100 Actual Chez Watts (These are hilarious!),
LT
- Re: 100 Actual Chez Watts (These are hilarious!),
LT
- Re: 100 Actual Chez Watts (These are hilarious!),
Geoff
- Re: 100 Actual Chez Watts (These are hilarious!),
LT
- Re: 100 Actual Chez Watts (These are hilarious!),
Walter Bushell
- Re: 100 Actual Chez Watts (These are hilarious!),
LT
- Re: 100 Actual Chez Watts (These are hilarious!),
louann_m@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: 100 Actual Chez Watts (These are hilarious!),
Walter Bushell
- Re: 100 Actual Chez Watts (These are hilarious!),
Sonofagunzel
- Re: 100 Actual Chez Watts (These are hilarious!),
LT
- Re: 100 Actual Chez Watts (These are hilarious!),
Sonofagunzel
- Re: 100 Actual Chez Watts (These are hilarious!),
Kermit
- Re: 100 Actual Chez Watts (These are hilarious!),
Walter Bushell
- Re: 100 Actual Chez Watts (These are hilarious!),
Geoff
- Re: 100 Actual Chez Watts (These are hilarious!),
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: 100 Actual Chez Watts (These are hilarious!),
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: 100 Actual Chez Watts (These are hilarious!),
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: 100 Actual Chez Watts (These are hilarious!),
Earle Jones
- Re: 100 Actual Chez Watts (These are hilarious!),
Kermit
- Re: 100 Actual Chez Watts (These are hilarious!),
Walter Bushell
- Re: 100 Actual Chez Watts (These are hilarious!),
Joe Cummings
- Re: 100 Actual Chez Watts (These are hilarious!),
Tony Raymonds
- Re: 100 Actual Chez Watts (These are hilarious!),
Bob Casanova
- Re: 100 Actual Chez Watts (These are hilarious!),
Desertphile
- Re: 100 Actual Chez Watts (These are hilarious!),
William Wingstedt
OT: Google trouble?,
Chris Thompson
Completely OT, but I just have to show off . . . .,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Completely OT, but I just have to show off . . . .,
Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)
- Re: Completely OT, but I just have to show off . . . .,
Susan S
- Re: Completely OT, but I just have to show off . . . .,
ediebur
- Re: Completely OT, but I just have to show off . . . .,
AC
- Re: Completely OT, but I just have to show off . . . .,
Earle Jones
- Re: Completely OT, but I just have to show off . . . .,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Completely OT, but I just have to show off . . . .,
Gary Bohn
Texas: Fossil find could lead to ruin of Crosbyton museum owner,
Jason Spaceman
Adnan Oktar (aka Harun Yahya) islamic creationist,
the heekster
- Re: Adnan Oktar (aka Harun Yahya) islamic creationist,
Will in New Haven
- Re: Adnan Oktar (aka Harun Yahya) islamic creationist,
John McKendry
- Re: Adnan Oktar (aka Harun Yahya) YOU ARE NEXT,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Adnan Oktar (aka Harun Yahya) YOU ARE NEXT,
wf3h
- Re: Adnan Oktar (aka Harun Yahya) YOU ARE NEXT,
Augray
- Re: Re: Adnan Oktar (aka Harun Yahya) YOU ARE NEXT,
Ye Old One
- Re: Adnan Oktar (aka Harun Yahya) YOU ARE NEXT,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Re: Adnan Oktar (aka Harun Yahya) YOU ARE NEXT,
Ye Old One
- Re: Adnan Oktar (aka Harun Yahya) YOU ARE NEXT,
Rupert Morrish
- Re: Adnan Oktar (aka Harun Yahya) YOU ARE NEXT,
Will in New Haven
- Re: Adnan Oktar (aka Harun Yahya) YOU ARE NEXT,
Rupert Morrish
- Re: Adnan Oktar (aka Harun Yahya) YOU ARE NEXT,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Adnan Oktar (aka Harun Yahya) YOU ARE NEXT,
Rupert Morrish
- Re: Adnan Oktar (aka Harun Yahya) YOU ARE NEXT,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Adnan Oktar (aka Harun Yahya) YOU ARE NEXT,
Lee Oswald Ving
- Re: Adnan Oktar (aka Harun Yahya) YOU ARE NEXT,
Rupert Morrish
- Re: Adnan Oktar (aka Harun Yahya) YOU ARE NEXT,
Kermit
- Re: Adnan Oktar (aka Harun Yahya) YOU ARE NEXT,
Cj
- Re: Adnan Oktar (aka Harun Yahya) YOU ARE NEXT,
Will in New Haven
- Re: Adnan Oktar (aka Harun Yahya) YOU ARE NEXT,
raven1
- Re: Adnan Oktar (aka Harun Yahya) YOU ARE NEXT,
Free Lunch
- Re: Adnan Oktar (aka Harun Yahya) YOU ARE NEXT,
Free Lunch
- Re: Adnan Oktar (aka Harun Yahya) YOU ARE NEXT,
Free Lunch
- Re: Adnan Oktar (aka Harun Yahya) YOU ARE NEXT,
the heekster
- Re: Adnan Oktar (aka Harun Yahya) YOU ARE NEXT,
DJT
- Re: Adnan Oktar (aka Harun Yahya) islamic creationist,
Mike L
Re: Free will vs determinism,
Vend
State Standards,
Alexander
Florida: Foster links Darwin, Hitler,
Jason Spaceman
- Re: Florida: Foster links Darwin, Hitler,
Ritsjoena
- Re: Florida: Foster links Darwin, Hitler,
The Bicycling Guitarist
- Re: Florida: Foster links Darwin, Hitler,
Inez
- Re: Florida: Foster links Darwin, Hitler,
Frank J
- Re: Florida: Foster links Darwin, Hitler,
TomS
- Re: Florida: Foster links Darwin, Hitler,
Rusty Sites
- Re: Florida: Foster links Darwin, Hitler,
Dr.GH
- Re: Florida: Foster links Darwin, Hitler,
Dr.GH
- Re: Florida: Foster links Darwin, Hitler,
JTEM
- Re: Florida: Foster links Darwin, Hitler,
Geoff
- Re: Florida: Foster links Darwin, Hitler,
JohnN
Re: Newbie Questions,
Elf M. Sternberg
language and evolution,
RichD
- Re: language and evolution,
Thurisaz the Einherjer
- Re: language and evolution,
Bob D
- Re: language and evolution,
Dick C
- Re: language and evolution,
conrad
- Re: language and evolution,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: language and evolution,
DJT
- Re: language and evolution,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: language and evolution,
TomS
- Re: language and evolution,
Dustan
- Re: language and evolution,
Timberwoof
- Re: language and evolution,
Richard Harter
- Re: language and evolution,
eroot
- Re: language and evolution,
AC
Should I red "The Origin of the Species"?,
Artificer
Re: Should I red "The Origin of the Species"?,
Steven L.
Re: Should I red "The Origin of the Species"?,
chris thompson
Re: Should I red "The Origin of the Species"?,
Cubist
Re: Should I red "The Origin of the Species"?,
Gordon Hudson
Re: Should I red "The Origin of the Species"?,
Rodjk #613
Re: Should I red "The Origin of the Species"?,
Daniel Kolle
Re: Should I red "The Origin of the Species"?,
rthearle@xxxxxxxxxxx
Re: Should I red "The Origin of the Species"?,
noshellswill
Re: Should I red "The Origin of the Species"?,
J. J. Lodder
Re: Should I red "The Origin of the Species"?,
Puppet_Sock
Sex ratios,
David Hare-Scott
- Re:***ratios,
John Harshman
- Re:***ratios,
hersheyh
- Re:***ratios,
Tim Tyler
- Re:***ratios,
David Hare-Scott
- Re:***ratios,
hersheyh
- Re:***ratios,
Tim Tyler
- Re:***ratios,
hersheyh
- Re:***ratios,
Josh Hayes
- Re:***ratios,
John Harshman
- Re:***ratios,
John Wilkins
- Re:***ratios,
Josh Hayes
- Re:***ratios,
John Wilkins
- Re:***ratios,
AC
- Re:***ratios,
John Wilkins
- Re:***ratios,
Arkalen
- Re:***ratios,
hersheyh
- Re:***ratios,
Nick Keighley
2500 Left handed people die per year using instruments designed for right handed people,
Terry
- Re: 2500 Left handed people die per year using instruments designed,
Inez
- Re: 2500 Left handed people die per year using instruments designed,
Roger Coppock
- Re: 2500 Left handed people die per year using instruments designed,
Baron Bodissey
- Re: 2500 Left handed people die per year using instruments designed,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: 2500 Left handed people die per year using instruments designed,
LT
- Re: 2500 Left handed people die per year using instruments designed,
Bruce
- Re: 2500 Left handed people die per year using instruments designed,
Tim Norfolk
- Re: 2500 Left handed people die per year using instruments designed,
Nick Keighley
- Re: 2500 Left handed people die per year using instruments designed,
Tim Norfolk
- Re: 2500 Left handed people die per year using instruments designed,
Kermit
- Re: 2500 Left handed people die per year using instruments designed,
Free Lunch
- Re: 2500 Left handed people die per year using instruments designed,
John Wilkins
- Re: 2500 Left handed people die per year using instruments designed,
Rupert Morrish
- Re: 2500 Left handed people die per year using instruments designed,
Walter Bushell
- Re: 2500 Left handed people die per year using instruments designed,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: 2500 Left handed people die per year using instruments designed,
Bob Casanova
- Re: 2500 Left handed people die per year using instruments designed,
Tim Norfolk
- Re: 2500 Left handed people die per year using instruments designed for right handed people,
David H
- Re: 2500 Left handed people die per year using instruments designed for right handed people,
John Wilkins
- Re: 2500 Left handed people die per year using instruments designed for right handed people,
Terry
- Re: 2500 Left handed people die per year using instruments designed,
lecody
- Re: 2500 Left handed people die per year using instruments designed,
Dan Drake
- Re: 2500 Left handed people die per year using instruments designed,
Peter Barber
- Re: 2500 Left handed people die per year using instruments designed,
lecody
- Re: 2500 Left handed people die per year using instruments designed,
Nick Keighley
- Re: 2500 Left handed people die per year using instruments designed for right handed people,
Walter Bushell
- Re: 2500 Left handed people die per year using instruments designed,
Tim Norfolk
- Re: 2500 Left handed people die per year using instruments designed,
Walter Bushell
- Re: 2500 Left handed people die per year using instruments designed for right handed people,
Free Lunch
- Re: 2500 Left handed people die per year using instruments designed,
Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)
- Re: 2500 Left handed people die per year using instruments designed,
Free Lunch
- Re: 2500 Left handed people die per year using instruments designed for right handed people,
Walter Bushell
- Re: 2500 Left handed people die per year using instruments designed for right handed people,
Greg Guarino
Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
Tony Raymonds
- Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)
- Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
Dick
- Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
Dick
- Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
Kermit
- Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
Dick
- Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
conrad
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
Denis Loubet
- Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
Dick
- Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
AC
- Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
Dick
- Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
tgdenning
- Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
AC
- Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
Dick
- Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
AC
- Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
AC
- Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
Dick
- Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
Kermit
- Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
Dick
- Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
Inez
- Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
Dick
- Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
Steven L.
- Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
Dick
- Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
Kermit
- Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
Dick
- Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
Inez
- Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
Jenny Brien
- Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
Nic
- Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
Dick
- Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
Dick
- Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
ArmBar
- Re: abiogenesis, determinism, free will and evolution,
Dick
Yang Doctrine: Columbine,
mccoy
- Re: Yang Doctrine: Columbine,
Ye Old One
- Re: Yang Doctrine: Columbine,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Yang Doctrine: Columbine,
raven1
- Re: Yang Doctrine: Columbine,
Wakboth
- Re: Yang Doctrine: Columbine,
Inez
- Re: Yang Doctrine: Columbine,
Homer Sapiens
- Re: Yang Doctrine: Columbine,
Mark Evans
- Re: Yang Doctrine: Columbine,
Stuart
- Re: Yang Doctrine: Columbine,
David Iain Greig
- Re: Yang Doctrine: Columbine,
wf3h
- Re: Yang Doctrine: Columbine,
phillip brown
- Re: Yang Doctrine: Columbine,
AC
- Re: Yang Doctrine: Columbine,
Desertphile
an evolution question,
Ms. Velveeta
Re: an evolution question,
Robert Carnegie
Re: an evolution question,
Artificer
JAlexander's Blazing Keyboard,
Joe Cummings
Re: Arthur, King of Time and Space and ToE vs ID,
Ye Old One
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Arthur, King of Time and Space and ToE vs ID,
Frank J
- Re: Arthur, King of Time and Space and ToE vs ID,
Desertphile
- Re: Arthur, King of Time and Space and ToE vs ID,
topmind
- Re: Arthur, King of Time and Space and ToE vs ID,
topmind
- Re: Arthur, King of Time and Space and ToE vs ID,
topmind
- Re: Arthur, King of Time and Space and ToE vs ID,
topmind
In the News: Canadian fossil makes waves in Huckabee's presidential run,
Jason Spaceman
K-bogosity,
mccoy
- Re: K-bogosity,
Thurisaz the Einherjer
- Re: K-bogosity,
raven1
- Re: K-bogosity,
Nic
- Re: K-bogosity,
Kermit
- Re: K-bogosity,
Will in New Haven
- Re: K-bogosity,
Prof Weird
- Re: K-bogosity,
Prof Weird
- Re: K-bogosity,
Rusty Sites
- Re: K-bogosity,
Shane
- Re: K-bogosity,
Desertphile
Have you gotten Shane-K'ed?,
mccoy
Have you gotten Shaned K'ed?,
mccoy
You should all be ashamed!,
knowwearman
- Re: You should all be ashamed!,
David Iain Greig
- Re: You should all be ashamed!,
SeppoP
- Re: You should all be ashamed!,
Ernest Major
- Re: You should all be ashamed!,
Thurisaz the Einherjer
- Re: You should all be ashamed!,
Inez
- Re: You should all be ashamed!,
Inez
- Re: You should all be ashamed!,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: You should all be ashamed!,
Artificer
- Re: You should all be ashamed!,
chris thompson
- Re: You should all be ashamed!,
Kermit
- Re: You should all be ashamed!,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: You should all be ashamed!,
Rusty Sites
- Re: You should all be ashamed!,
Cheezits
- Re: You should all be ashamed!,
Desertphile
A challenge to McClueless - Step one.,
Ye Old One
- Re: A challenge to McClueless - Step one.,
Therion Ware
- Re: A challenge to McClueless - Step one.,
Ye Old One
- Re: A challenge to McClueless - Step one.,
Ye Old One
- Re: A challenge to McClueless - Step one.,
Lee Jay
- Re: A challenge to McClueless - Step one.,
Ye Old One
- Re: A challenge to McClueless - Step one.,
Desertphile
- Re: A challenge to McClueless - Step one.,
Ye Old One
- Re: A challenge to McClueless - Step one.,
Ye Old One
- Re: A challenge to McClueless - Step one.,
Ye Old One
- Re: A challenge to McClueless - Step one.,
Ye Old One
The eye again,
Terry
- Re: The eye again,
Rusty Sites
- Re: The eye again,
John Harshman
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Chez Watt: The eye again,
alextangent
- Re: The eye again,
r norman
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
AC
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
r norman
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
r norman
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
r norman
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
Bill Morse
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
AC
- Re: The eye again,
Walter Bushell
- Re: The eye again,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: The eye again,
r norman
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
r norman
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
Walter Bushell
- Re: The eye again,
r norman
- Re: The eye again,
AC
- Re: The eye again,
John Harshman
- Re: The eye again,
_Arthur
- Re: The eye again,
Treus
- Re: The eye again,
r norman
- Re: The eye again,
Treus
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
r norman
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
Treus
- Re: The eye again,
John Wilkins
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
Treus
- Re: The eye again,
Max
- Re: The eye again,
Treus
- Re: The eye again,
Max
- Re: The eye again,
Greg Guarino
- Re: The eye again,
Treus
- Re: The eye again,
Christopher Denney
- Re: The eye again,
Treus
- Re: The eye again,
Greg Guarino
- Re: The eye again,
Treus
- Re: The eye again,
r norman
- Re: The eye again,
Treus
- Re: The eye again,
r norman
- Re: The eye again,
Treus
- Re: The eye again,
r norman
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
Treus
- Re: The eye again,
r norman
- Re: The eye again,
Treus
- Re: The eye again,
r norman
- Re: The eye again,
Treus
- Re: The eye again,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: The eye again,
Treus
- Re: The eye again,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: The eye again,
Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)
- Re: The eye again,
r norman
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
r norman
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
r norman
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
r norman
- Re: The eye again,
Treus
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
Treus
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
Treus
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
Treus
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
Treus
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
Treus
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
Treus
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
r norman
- Re: The eye again,
Treus
- Re: The eye again,
r norman
- Re: The eye again,
Treus
- Re: The eye again,
r norman
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
r norman
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
r norman
- Re: The eye again,
Walter Bushell
- Chez Watt Re: The eye again,
r norman
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
Treus
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
Greg Guarino
- Re: The eye again,
Treus
- Re: The eye again,
John McKendry
- Re: The eye again,
Treus
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
John McKendry
- Re: The eye again,
Treus
- Re: The eye again,
Mark Isaak
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
John McKendry
- Re: The eye again,
Treus
- Re: The eye again,
Cj
- Re: The eye again,
Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)
- Re: The eye again,
Mark Isaak
- Re: The eye again,
Greg Guarino
- Re: The eye again,
Treus
- Re: The eye again,
Greg Guarino
- Re: The eye again,
Treus
- Re: The eye again,
Greg Guarino
- Re: The eye again,
Treus
- Re: The eye again,
Arkalen
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
John Harshman
- Re: The eye again,
Dave Empey
- Re: The eye again,
John Harshman
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
John Wilkins
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
John Wilkins
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
John Wilkins
- Re: The eye again,
r norman
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
r norman
- Message not available
- Re: The eye again,
r norman
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
r norman
- Re: The eye again,
John Wilkins
- Re: The eye again,
Walter Bushell
- Re: The eye again,
John Wilkins
- Re: The eye again,
Steven L.
- Re: The eye again,
Treus
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
Treus
- Message not available
- Re: The eye again,
Treus
- Message not available
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Message not available
- Re: The eye again,
Glenn
- Re: The eye again,
John Wilkins
- Re: The eye again,
_Arthur
- Re: The eye again,
Tiny Bulcher
Message not availableRe: The eye again,
Walter Bushell
Re: The eye again,
Treus
Re: The eye again,
Free Lunch
Re: The eye again,
Einar
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: The eye again,
_Arthur
Romania Removes Evolution From School Curriculum,
Steven L.
Regenerating,
Glenn
Creationist claim: rapid fossilization in Venice (Italy),
Robert Carnegie
Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Iago
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Inez
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Steve Marshall
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Ernest Major
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Iago
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Earle Jones
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Vend
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Harry K
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Dan Drake
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
catshark
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Dan Drake
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Jenny Brien
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Dan Drake
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Bodega
- Message not available
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
- Message not available
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Mike L
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Mike L
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Jenny Brien
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Dr.GH
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Dr.GH
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
James Goetz
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
James Goetz
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
James Goetz
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Michael Siemon
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Michael Siemon
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Dr.GH
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
James Goetz
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
James Goetz
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Michael Siemon
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Rupert Morrish
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Walter Bushell
- Message not available
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
James Goetz
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
James Goetz
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
James Goetz
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Dr.GH
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Michael Siemon
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
The Last Conformist
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
James Goetz
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
James Goetz
- Message not available
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Dan Drake
Message not availableRe: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Andre Lieven
Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
James Goetz
Message not availableRe: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Mark Isaak
Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Walter Bushell
Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Mark Isaak
Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
AC
Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Walter Bushell
Message not availableRe: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Bea Mused
Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Bea Mused
Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Mark Isaak
Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Mark Isaak
Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Bea Mused
Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Bea Mused
Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Walter Bushell
Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Walter Bushell
Message not availableRe: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
JennyB
Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Dr.GH
Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
Message not availableRe: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
Message not available
Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
James Goetz
Message not available
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Peter Barber
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
alextangent
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
alextangent
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Rupert Morrish
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
John Wilkins
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
RAM
- Re: Another bunch of Flood Question....,
SkyEyes
tezt,
Glenn
Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
backspace
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
Kermit
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
John Harshman
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
backspace
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Inez
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
John Harshman
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
backspace
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
John Harshman
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Inez
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
eroot
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Kermit
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Greg Guarino
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
John Wilkins
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Greg Guarino
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
David Hare-Scott
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
Woland
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
Treus
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
Inez
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
Vend
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
Treus
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
Vend
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
Treus
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
Treus
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
John Harshman
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Treus
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
John Harshman
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Treus
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
John Harshman
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
_Arthur
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Treus
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
mark
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Treus
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
_Arthur
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Treus
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
_Arthur
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Cj
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Cj
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Max
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
Vend
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
Treus
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
_Arthur
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
Seanpit
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
Glenn
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
wf3h
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
Treus
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
Glenn
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
Treus
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
Glenn
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
John Harshman
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Seanpit
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
John Harshman
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Seanpit
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
John Harshman
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Glenn
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
stevedholl
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
stevedholl
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
noctiluca
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
wf3h
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
wf3h
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
wf3h
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
Treus
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
Treus
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
Treus
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
Treus
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
wf3h
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
hhyapster
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
wf3h
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
hhyapster
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
hhyapster
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
Woland
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
Treus
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
wf3h
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
Treus
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
hersheyh
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
John Harshman
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Glenn
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
John Harshman
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Glenn
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
John Harshman
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Glenn
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
John Harshman
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Glenn
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
peter
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Glenn
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
peter
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Glenn
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
peter
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Glenn
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
John Harshman
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
hersheyh
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
John Harshman
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
hersheyh
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Ernest Major
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Glenn
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Ernest Major
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Glenn
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Ernest Major
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Glenn
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Glenn
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Woland
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
John Harshman
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Treus
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
John Harshman
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Treus
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
John Harshman
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Treus
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
John Harshman
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Treus
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
John Harshman
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Treus
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
John Harshman
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Treus
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
John Harshman
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Treus
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
John Harshman
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Phil
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Treus
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
John Harshman
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Greg Guarino
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Inez
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Treus
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Inez
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
Treus
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect,
John Wilkins
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
noshellswill
- Re: Evolution and natural selection which is the cause and effect ?,
Max
News: Evolution of the sexes: What a fungus can tell us.,
Ye Old One
News: Missing molecules key to breast cancer spread.,
Ye Old One
OT: Testing sample of R-ALA,
Friar Broccoli
News: Deep sea secret: Study sheds light on ocean's thermal vents.,
Ye Old One
News: Fresh airing of evolution draws crowd.,
Ye Old One
News: SC Education Board approves textbook, despite questions.,
Ye Old One
Clarification of evolution process,
jimsmail3-tmp1
Re: Clarification of evolution process,
Rupert Morrish
Re: Clarification of evolution process,
Free Lunch
Re: Clarification of evolution process,
John Harshman
Re: Clarification of evolution process,
Ernest Major
Message not available
Message not available
Message not available
Re: Clarification of evolution process,
John Bode
Pausing,
Glenn
- Re: Pausing,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Pausing,
Glenn
- Re: Pausing,
r norman
- Re: Pausing,
Glenn
- Re: Pausing,
r norman
- Re: Pausing,
Glenn
- Re: Pausing,
r norman
- Re: Pausing,
Glenn
- Re: Pausing,
r norman
- Re: Pausing,
John McKendry
- Re: Pausing,
John Harshman
- Re: Pausing,
Glenn
- Re: Pausing,
Glenn
- Re: Pausing,
r norman
- Re: Pausing,
Glenn
- Re: Pausing,
Treus
- Re: Pausing,
John Wilkins
- Re: Pausing,
Glenn
- Re: Pausing,
John Wilkins
- Re: Pausing,
Glenn
- Re: Pausing,
r norman
- Re: Pausing,
Treus
- Re: Pausing,
Glenn
- Re: Pausing,
Treus
- Re: Pausing,
r norman
- Re: Pausing,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Pausing,
r norman
- Re: Pausing,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Pausing,
peter
- Re: Pausing,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Pausing,
Frank J
Speedy Species Surprise,
Giant Sloth
Leaves on bugs?,
Glenn
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
John Harshman
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
Glenn
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
Inez
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
John Harshman
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
Glenn
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
John Harshman
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
Glenn
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
John Harshman
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
Glenn
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
Robert Carnegie
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
Glenn
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
Rupert Morrish
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
John Harshman
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
Glenn
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
Klaus H
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
Glenn
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
John Harshman
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
Glenn
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
John Harshman
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
Glenn
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
John Harshman
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
Klaus H
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
Geoff
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
Cj
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
mel turner
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
Glenn
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
Glenn
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
Ernest Major
Message not availableRe: Leaves on bugs?,
Tom McDonald
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
Tracy P. Hamilton
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
Glenn
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
John Harshman
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
Geoff
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
Ernest Major
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
Glenn
Re: Leaves on bugs?,
Klaus H
Real Help for Evos and other OldTimers!!,
Glenn
Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
Seanpit
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
_Arthur
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
Seanpit
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
Glenn
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
Seanpit
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
Inez
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
John Stockwell
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
_Arthur
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
Seanpit
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
_Arthur
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
Seanpit
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
_Arthur
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
Seanpit
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
_Arthur
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
Seanpit
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
hersheyh
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
John Stockwell
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
Inez
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
_Arthur
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
Seanpit
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
Glenn
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
Seanpit
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
_Arthur
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
Seanpit
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
_Arthur
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
_Arthur
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
Seanpit
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
beatmastabill
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
Glenn
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
Ernest Major
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
Glenn
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
Stuart
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
John Stockwell
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
Glenn
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
Glenn
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
JAlexander
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
Robert Weldon
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
Glenn
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
Glenn
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
JAlexander
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison Formation?,
Rolf
- Message not available
Speedy evolution surprise,
Giant Sloth
In the News: DI Irony Alert,
jspaceman
In the News: New Survey Supports Evolution, But Critics Disagree,
jspaceman
- Re: In the News: New Survey Supports Evolution, But Critics,
Elf M. Sternberg
- Re: In the News: New Survey Supports Evolution, But Critics,
Homer Sapiens
- Re: In the News: New Survey Supports Evolution, But Critics,
Frank J
- Re: In the News: New Survey Supports Evolution, But Critics,
nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: In the News: New Survey Supports Evolution, But Critics,
Robert Weldon
- Re: In the News: New Survey Supports Evolution, But Critics,
Chris Krolczyk
- Re: In the News: New Survey Supports Evolution, But Critics,
Rodjk #613
- Re: In the News: New Survey Supports Evolution, But Critics,
stew dean
- Re: In the News: New Survey Supports Evolution, But Critics,
Desertphile
- Re: In the News: New Survey Supports Evolution, But Critics Disagree,
Kermit
- Re: In the News: New Survey Supports Evolution, But Critics Disagree,
Ron O
- Re: In the News: New Survey Supports Evolution, But Critics Disagree,
Richard Smol
- Re: In the News: New Survey Supports Evolution, But Critics Disagree,
Richard Smol
Florida: Community is split on 'evolution' in state schools,
jspaceman
Male Monkeys That Pay for Sex,
Steven L.
Re: Male Monkeys That Pay for Sex,
JohnN
Re: Male Monkeys That Pay for Sex,
Therion Ware
News: Eden's apple falls far from evolution tree,
Ye Old One
TV shows on evolution,
Terry
When were the establishment wrongly early adopters?,
David Hare-Scott
- Re: When were the establishment wrongly early adopters?,
John Wilkins
- Re: When were the establishment wrongly early adopters?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: When were the establishment wrongly early adopters?,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: When were the establishment wrongly early adopters?,
Will in New Haven
- Re: When were the establishment wrongly early adopters?,
chris thompson
- Re: When were the establishment wrongly early adopters?,
dhacat
- Re: When were the establishment wrongly early adopters?,
Martin Golding
- Re: When were the establishment wrongly early adopters?,
dhacat
- Re: When were the establishment wrongly early adopters?,
Walter Bushell
- Re: When were the establishment wrongly early adopters?,
Earle Jones
- Re: When were the establishment wrongly early adopters?,
John Wilkins
- Re: When were the establishment wrongly early adopters?,
catshark
- Re: When were the establishment wrongly early adopters?,
Mark Isaak
- Re: When were the establishment wrongly early adopters?,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: When were the establishment wrongly early adopters?,
SkyEyes
- Re: When were the establishment wrongly early adopters?,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: When were the establishment wrongly early adopters?,
Ron O
- Re: When were the establishment wrongly early adopters?,
Nic
- Re: When were the establishment wrongly early adopters?,
Nic
- Re: When were the establishment wrongly early adopters?,
Nic
Are there any TV shows about evolution?,
Terry
Another miracle.,
Earle Jones
McClueless Quote of the Day [from another place],
Ye Old One
- Re: McClueless Quote of the Day [from another place],
Jobeth66
- Re: McClueless Quote of the Day [from another place],
Chris Krolczyk
- Re: McClueless Quote of the Day [from another place],
LSR
- Re: McClueless Quote of the Day [from another place],
Robert Carnegie
- Re: McClueless Quote of the Day [from another place],
LSR
- Re: McClueless Quote of the Day [from another place],
Ernest Major
- Re: McClueless Quote of the Day [from another place],
LSR
- Re: McClueless Quote of the Day [from another place],
Ernest Major
- Re: McClueless Quote of the Day [from another place],
Nosterill
- Re: Re: McClueless Quote of the Day [from another place],
Ye Old One
- Re: McClueless Quote of the Day [from another place],
Harry K
- Re: McClueless Quote of the Day [from another place],
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: McClueless Quote of the Day [from another place],
Jenny Brien
- Re: McClueless Quote of the Day [from another place],
Puppet_Sock
- Re: McClueless Quote of the Day [from another place],
Rolf
- Re: McClueless Quote of the Day [from another place],
Desertphile
- Re: McClueless Quote of the Day [from another place],
Ye Old One
Stop House Resolution 888!,
shepherdmoon
AIG Fraud trial,
The Bicycling Guitarist
How important was classical determinism to the history of the,
James Goetz
- Re: How important was classical determinism to the history of the,
r norman
- Re: How important was classical determinism to the history of the,
James Goetz
- Re: How important was classical determinism to the history of the,
r norman
- Re: How important was classical determinism to the history of the,
James Goetz
- Re: How important was classical determinism to the history of the,
Nic
- Re: How important was classical determinism to the history of the,
Rupert Morrish
- Re: How important was classical determinism to the history of the,
James Goetz
- Re: How important was classical determinism to the history of the,
r norman
- Re: How important was classical determinism to the history of the,
James Goetz
- Re: How important was classical determinism to the history of the,
r norman
- Re: How important was classical determinism to the history of the,
James Goetz
- Re: How important was classical determinism to the history of the,
John Wilkins
- Re: How important was classical determinism to the history of the,
James Goetz
- Re: How important was classical determinism to the history of the,
John Wilkins
- Re: How important was classical determinism to the history of the,
James Goetz
- Re: How important was classical determinism to the history of the,
r norman
- Re: How important was classical determinism to the history of the,
James Goetz
- Re: How important was classical determinism to the history of the,
John Wilkins
- Re: How important was classical determinism to the history of the,
James Goetz
- Re: How important was classical determinism to the history of the,
John Wilkins
- Re: How important was classical determinism to the history of the,
James Goetz
- Re: How important was classical determinism to the history of the,
John Wilkins
- Re: How important was classical determinism to the history of the,
James Goetz
- Re: How important was classical determinism to the history of the,
Nic
- Re: How important was classical determinism to the history of the,
James Goetz
- Re: How important was classical determinism to the history of the,
Nic
- Re: How important was classical determinism to the history of the,
Dick
- Re: How important was classical determinism to the history of the,
Nic
- Re: How important was classical determinism to the history of the,
Dick
- Re: How important was classical determinism to the history of the,
Nic
Ronald Bailey: Evolutionary Politics,
jspaceman
Re: fnord looking for newsgroup server,
Cory Albrecht
I'm Confessin', but not to being a "dishonest little prick",
Rolf
More about Morrison Formation plants - attn. Sean Pitman,
richardalanforrest
Still trying to get a straight answer from Sean Pitman,
richardalanforrest
Re: Winner: Re: Chez Watt Ballot Vote 1 January 2008,
Tiny Bulcher
An idea for creationists to ponder,
ken
Dinesh D'Souza: Are Atheists Cultural Christians,
jspaceman
Creationism/Evolution in Science Education on Diane Rhem Show,
killerlimpet
Don't Read, Just Re-fnording. Same Nym, New ISP,
SkyEyes
Creationist Movie Expelled Producers LIED...,
Andre Lieven
Re: Is Homosexuality A Necessary Step In Human Evolution?,
Ymir
Fingering Science,
Glenn
(OT) The mind of the Party Member Ron Paul supporter,
Desertphile
The Insectsdidit,
Glenn
- Re: The Insectsdidit,
John Harshman
- Re: The Insectsdidit,
Glenn
- Re: The Insectsdidit,
Rusty Sites
- Re: The Insectsdidit,
Glenn
- Re: The Insectsdidit,
Rusty Sites
- Re: The Insectsdidit,
Glenn
- Re: The Insectsdidit,
RAM
- Re: The Insectsdidit,
Max
- Re: The Insectsdidit,
Glenn
- Re: The Insectsdidit,
Max
- Re: The Insectsdidit,
Glenn
- Re: The Insectsdidit,
Bob Casanova
- Re: The Insectsdidit,
Baron Bodissey
- Re: The Insectsdidit,
Glenn
- Re: The Insectsdidit,
John Wilkins
- Re: The Insectsdidit,
Greg G.
- Re: The Insectsdidit,
AC
- Re: The Insectsdidit,
John Harshman
- Re: The Insectsdidit,
Glenn
- Re: The Insectsdidit,
snex
- Re: The Insectsdidit,
Rusty Sites
- Re: The Insectsdidit,
John Harshman
- Re: The Insectsdidit,
Glenn
- Re: The Insectsdidit,
John Harshman
- Re: The Insectsdidit,
John Wilkins
- Re: The Insectsdidit,
John Harshman
- Re: The Insectsdidit,
Bob Casanova
- Re: The Insectsdidit,
John Wilkins
- Re: The Insectsdidit,
Glenn
- Re: The Insectsdidit,
Bob Casanova
- Re: The Insectsdidit,
Glenn
- Re: The Insectsdidit,
John Harshman
- Re: The Insectsdidit,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: The Insectsdidit,
John Wilkins
Re: The Insectsdidit,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: Evolution question. One species to another.,
Free Lunch
- Re: Evolution question. One species to another.,
snex
- Re: Evolution question. One species to another.,
Artificer
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Evolution question. One species to another.,
Dick C
- Re: Evolution question. One species to another.,
r norman
- Re: Evolution question. One species to another.,
_Arthur
- Re: Evolution question. One species to another.,
chris thompson
- Re: Evolution question. One species to another.,
Ernest Major
- Re: Evolution question. One species to another.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: Evolution question. One species to another.,
John Wilkins
- Re: Evolution question. One species to another.,
Artificer
- Re: Evolution question. One species to another.,
Stuart
- Re: Evolution question. One species to another.,
Tony Raymonds
- Message not available
Message not available
Re: Evolution question. One species to another.,
jimsmail3-tmp1
OT: U.S. Education Crisis,
dkomo
McCoy strikes on alt atheism,
Cj
- Re: McCoy strikes on alt atheism,
Bodega
- Re: McCoy strikes on alt atheism,
mccoy
- Re: McCoy strikes on alt atheism,
David Iain Greig
- Re: McCoy strikes on alt atheism,
Chris Krolczyk
- Re: McCoy strikes on alt atheism,
Earle Jones
- Re: McCoy strikes on alt atheism,
Dave Fritzinger
- Re: McCoy strikes on alt atheism,
AC
- Re: McCoy strikes on alt atheism,
Dave Fritzinger
- Re: McCoy strikes on alt atheism,
AC
- Re: McCoy strikes on alt atheism,
AC
- Re: McCoy strikes on alt atheism,
Desertphile
- Re: McCoy strikes on alt atheism,
Earle Jones
- Re: McCoy strikes on alt atheism,
Chris Krolczyk
- Re: McCoy strikes on alt atheism,
Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)
- Re: Re: McCoy strikes on alt atheism,
Ye Old One
- Re: McCoy strikes on alt atheism,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: McCoy strikes on alt atheism,
catshark
- Re: McCoy strikes on alt atheism,
Frank J
- Re: McCoy strikes on alt atheism,
Earle Jones
please recommend a free news server,
The Bicycling Guitarist
Introduction,
DanielSan
What Happened to Gunderscore in TO?,
James Goetz
Concepts that Wikipedia asks me to embrace, 5th January 2008,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Concepts that Wikipedia asks me to embrace, 5th January 2008,
John Harshman
- Re: Concepts that Wikipedia asks me to embrace, 5th January 2008,
John Wilkins
- Re: Concepts that Wikipedia asks me to embrace, 5th January 2008,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Concepts that Wikipedia asks me to embrace, 5th January 2008,
r norman
- Re: Concepts that Wikipedia asks me to embrace, 5th January 2008,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Concepts that Wikipedia asks me to embrace, 5th January 2008,
Ymir
- Re: Concepts that Wikipedia asks me to embrace, 5th January 2008,
r norman
- Re: Concepts that Wikipedia asks me to embrace, 5th January 2008,
John Wilkins
- Re: Concepts that Wikipedia asks me to embrace, 5th January 2008,
Susan S
- Re: Concepts that Wikipedia asks me to embrace, 5th January 2008,
Bill Hudson
- Re: Concepts that Wikipedia asks me to embrace, 5th January 2008,
Ymir
- Re: Concepts that Wikipedia asks me to embrace, 5th January 2008,
r norman
- Re: Concepts that Wikipedia asks me to embrace, 5th January 2008,
Bill Hudson
- Re: Concepts that Wikipedia asks me to embrace, 5th January 2008,
Shearwater
- Re: Concepts that Wikipedia asks me to embrace, 5th January 2008,
Perplexed in Peoria
Two very sad pieces off the web,
John Harshman
Quote Mine Project: For Review & Approval,
catshark
Re: Professor of genetics says 'No!' to evolution,
The Enigmatic One
Raising Lamark,
Glenn
What is the creationist fascination with the word "accident".,
corky
The Bell Curve.,
Gary Bohn
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Christopher Denney
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Homer Sapiens
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Frank J
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Desertphile
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Mr D.
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Gary Bohn
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
r norman
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
r norman
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
r norman
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
r norman
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
r norman
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
r norman
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
r norman
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
tgdenning
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Bill Morse
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Bill Morse
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
r norman
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
John Wilkins
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
r norman
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
r norman
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Bill Morse
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Nic
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Nic
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Nic
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Bill Morse
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
tgdenning
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Nic
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Nic
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Nic
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
tgdenning
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Bill Morse
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
tgdenning
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
tgdenning
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
tgdenning
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
tgdenning
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
tgdenning
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Gary Bohn
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Max
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Ben Standeven
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Nic
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Kevin Wayne Williams
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Gary Bohn
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Kevin Wayne Williams
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Christopher Denney
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Free Lunch
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Free Lunch
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Free Lunch
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Free Lunch
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Vend
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
tgdenning
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Vend
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
tgdenning
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Kermit
- Message not available
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Norfolk
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
tgdenning
- Message not available
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Vend
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
tgdenning
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Vend
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
tgdenning
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Vend
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Bill Morse
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
tgdenning
Re: The Bell Curve.,
Walter Bushell
Re: The Bell Curve.,
eyelessgame
Re: The Bell Curve.,
louann_m@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Christopher Denney
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Christopher Denney
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Shane
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Christopher Denney
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Shane
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Tim Tyler
- Re: The Bell Curve.,
Shane
Re: The Bell Curve.,
Bill Morse
A modest proposal,
John Harshman
Explosion before the Cambrian.,
Rolf
A predictable response,
Alexander
- Re: A predictable response,
Ron O
- Re: A predictable response,
Evopeach
- Re: A predictable response,
Free Lunch
- Re: A predictable response,
Lee Jay
- Re: A predictable response,
richardalanforrest
- Re: A predictable response,
SeppoP
- Re: A predictable response,
Ron O
- Re: A predictable response,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: A predictable response,
Homer Sapiens
- Re: A predictable response,
Ron O
- Re: A predictable response,
Joe Cummings
- Re: A predictable response,
Ernest Major
- Re: A predictable response,
wf3h
- Re: A predictable response,
Mr D.
- Re: A predictable response,
Mark Isaak
- Re: A predictable response,
Matchstick
- Re: A predictable response,
richardalanforrest
- Re: A predictable response,
Ron O
- Re: A predictable response,
Evopeach
- Re: A predictable response,
catshark
- Re: A predictable response,
Desertphile
Trying to get a straight answer out of Sean Pitman....,
richardalanforrest
In the News: US 'doomed' if creationist president elected: scientists,
Jason Spaceman
Next Step in Human Evolution,
Artificer
- Re: Next Step in Human Evolution,
John Wilkins
- Re: Next Step in Human Evolution,
corky
- Re: Next Step in Human Evolution,
Jim Willemin
- Re: Next Step in Human Evolution,
Inez
- Re: Next Step in Human Evolution,
Sir Frederick
- Re: Next Step in Human Evolution,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Next Step in Human Evolution,
James Goetz
- Message not available
- Re: Next Step in Human Evolution,
Tim Tyler
- Re: Next Step in Human Evolution,
Steven L.
- Re: Next Step in Human Evolution,
Robert Carnegie
Seeking more information on Creationist thought!,
orfyreus248@xxxxxxxxx
observing macro-evolution: eight generations, one year, boom!,
Kent Paul Dolan
Very Nice Quote,
Susan S
NY Times: science & religion, evolution & faith,
max maypo
Green Light for Institute on Creation in Texas,
Jeffrey Turner
News: Evolution Book Sees No Science-Religion Gap.,
Ye Old One
News: Evolution under the microscope.,
Ye Old One
Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?,
Danwood
- Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?,
Inez
- Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?,
John Harshman
- Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?,
Danwood
- Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?,
John Harshman
- Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?,
Danwood
- Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?,
John Harshman
- Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?,
Charles Brenner
- Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?,
Christopher Denney
- Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?,
Rusty Sites
- Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?,
Danwood
- Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?,
Christopher Denney
- Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?,
Danwood
- Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?,
Christopher Denney
- Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?,
Rusty Sites
- Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?,
Danwood
- Message not available
- Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?,
Danwood
- Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?,
Inez
- Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?,
Danwood
- Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?,
Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)
- Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?,
Inez
- Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?,
josephus
- Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?,
Danwood
- Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?,
Rusty Sites
- Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?,
Danwood
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?,
Nick Keighley
Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?,
Nick Keighley
Evolution in progress,
Artificer
Re: Evolution in progress,
John Harshman
Re: Evolution in progress,
louann_m@xxxxxxxxx
Re: Evolution in progress,
conrad
Re: Evolution in progress,
Steven L.
Re: Evolution in progress,
Craig T
Re: Evolution in progress,
Desertphile
Orientation of dinosaur bones.,
richardalanforrest
Re: In the News: Intelligent Design Group Identifies Failures of,
Earle Jones
Re: Chez Watt Re: The Current Universe Being Observed Is No Longer,
Greg G.
Evolution Simulator,
Artificer
Re: How many generations back to abiogenesis, etc.? (The Ancestor's Tale),
J.J. O'Shea
News: Scientists find missing evolutionary link using tiny fungus crystal.,
Ye Old One
Question about classification,
Inez
- Re: Question about classification,
John Wilkins
- Re: Question about classification,
Will in New Haven
- Re: Question about classification,
Inez
- Re: Question about classification,
John Wilkins
- Re: Question about classification,
TomS
- Re: Question about classification,
John Wilkins
- Re: Question about classification,
John Harshman
- Re: Question about classification,
Baron Bodissey
- Re: Question about classification,
TomS
- Re: Question about classification,
Ernest Major
- Re: Question about classification,
John Wilkins
- Re: Question about classification,
Ernest Major
- Re: Question about classification,
John Wilkins
- Re: Question about classification,
Ernest Major
- Re: Question about classification,
John Wilkins
- Re: Question about classification,
Gary Bohn
- Re: Question about classification,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Question about classification,
James Goetz
- Re: Question about classification,
Tony Raymonds
- Re: Question about classification,
r norman
- Re: Question about classification,
Timberwoof
- Re: Question about classification,
John Harshman
- Re: Question about classification,
Inez
- Re: Question about classification,
John Harshman
- Re: Question about classification,
Inez
- Re: Question about classification,
John Harshman
- Re: Question about classification,
Vend
- Re: Question about classification,
John Harshman
- Re: Question about classification,
John Wilkins
- Re: Question about classification,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Question about classification,
Vend
- Re: Question about classification,
Inez
- Re: Question about classification,
John Harshman
- Re: Question about classification,
John Wilkins
- Re: Question about classification,
Inez
- Re: Question about classification,
r norman
- Re: Question about classification,
John Harshman
- Re: Question about classification,
r norman
- Re: Question about classification,
John Harshman
- Re: Question about classification,
r norman
- Re: Question about classification,
John Wilkins
- Re: Question about classification,
Vend
- Re: Question about classification,
John Harshman
- Re: Question about classification,
r norman
- Re: Question about classification,
John Harshman
- Re: Question about classification,
Ernest Major
- Re: Question about classification,
John Wilkins
- Re: Question about classification,
John Wilkins
- Re: Question about classification,
r norman
- Re: Question about classification,
John Wilkins
- Re: Question about classification,
John Harshman
- Re: Question about classification,
John Wilkins
- Re: Question about classification,
r norman
- Re: Question about classification,
John Wilkins
- Re: Question about classification,
Vend
- Re: Question about classification,
Vend
- Re: Question about classification,
r norman
- Re: Question about classification,
Vend
- Re: Question about classification,
r norman
- Re: Question about classification,
Vend
- Re: Question about classification,
John Harshman
- Re: Question about classification,
TomS
- Re: Question about classification,
John Harshman
- Re: Question about classification,
Jeffrey Turner
- Re: Question about classification,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Question about classification,
Ymir
- Re: Question about classification,
John Harshman
- Re: Question about classification,
Ymir
- Re: Question about classification,
John Wilkins
- Re: Question about classification,
John Wilkins
- Re: Question about classification,
Ymir
- Re: Question about classification,
r norman
- Re: Question about classification,
Vend
- Re: Question about classification,
r norman
- Re: Question about classification,
AC
- Re: Question about classification,
Baron Bodissey
- Re: Question about classification,
John Harshman
- Re: Question about classification,
Glenn
- Re: Question about classification,
Ernest Major
- Re: Question about classification,
Glenn
- Re: Question about classification,
Ernest Major
- Re: Question about classification,
Glenn
- Re: Question about classification,
John Harshman
- Re: Question about classification,
Glenn
- Re: Question about classification,
John Harshman
- Re: Question about classification,
r norman
- Re: Question about classification,
John Harshman
- Re: Question about classification,
r norman
- Re: Question about classification,
John Harshman
- Re: Question about classification,
r norman
- Re: Question about classification,
John Harshman
- Re: Question about classification,
John Wilkins
- Re: Question about classification,
John Harshman
- Re: Question about classification,
John Wilkins
- Re: Question about classification,
r norman
- Re: Question about classification,
John Harshman
- Re: Question about classification,
John Wilkins
- Re: Question about classification,
John Harshman
- Re: Question about classification,
John Wilkins
- Re: Question about classification,
John Harshman
- Re: Question about classification,
r norman
- Re: Question about classification,
John Harshman
- Re: Question about classification,
Glenn
- Re: Question about classification,
John Wilkins
- Re: Question about classification,
r norman
- Re: Question about classification,
Glenn
- Re: Question about classification,
r norman
- Re: Question about classification,
Glenn
- Re: Question about classification,
r norman
- Re: Question about classification,
Glenn
- Re: Question about classification,
John Wilkins
- Re: Question about classification,
Glenn
- Re: Question about classification,
r norman
- Re: Question about classification,
Glenn
- Re: Question about classification,
r norman
- Re: Question about classification,
Glenn
- Re: Question about classification,
John Wilkins
- Re: Question about classification,
Free Lunch
- Re: Question about classification,
r norman
- Re: Question about classification,
Baron Bodissey
- Re: Question about classification,
r norman
- Re: Question about classification,
John Harshman
- Re: Question about classification,
John Harshman
- Re: Question about classification,
Glenn
- Re: Question about classification,
John Harshman
- Re: Question about classification,
Glenn
- Re: Question about classification,
Andre Lieven
Re: Seminal commentary on accurate context for Creation in Genesis,
Robert Carnegie
Re: U.S. nature programs have stunning little information versus UK ?,
Robert Carnegie
Re: U.S. nature programs have stunning little information versus UK ?,
alextangent
Re: U.S. nature programs have stunning little information versus UK ?,
Ritsjoena
Re: Salad-Bar Christians,
Earle Jones
1954 blast,
Glenn
Re: Sudden life appearance,
John Harshman
Re: Question to moderator!,
John Harshman
Re: All life was destroyed at the end of the dinosaur',
Free Lunch
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: All life was destroyed at the end of the dinosaur',
Jim Willemin
- Re: All life was destroyed at the end of the dinosaur',
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: All life was destroyed at the end of the dinosaur',
Vend
- Re: All life was destroyed at the end of the dinosaur',
Artificer
- Re: All life was destroyed at the end of the dinosaur',
JTEM
- Re: All life was destroyed at the end of the dinosaur',
Vlad the accountant
- Re: All life was destroyed at the end of the dinosaur',
AC
- Re: All life was destroyed at the end of the dinosaur',
John Harshman
- Re: All life was destroyed at the end of the dinosaur',
John Wilkins
- Re: All life was destroyed at the end of the dinosaur',
TomS
- Re: All life was destroyed at the end of the dinosaur',
John Wilkins
- Re: All life was destroyed at the end of the dinosaur',
John Harshman
- Re: All life was destroyed at the end of the dinosaur',
Walter Bushell
- Re: All life was destroyed at the end of the dinosaur',
Susan S
- Re: All life was destroyed at the end of the dinosaur',
Bob Casanova
- Re: All life was destroyed at the end of the dinosaur',
John Wilkins
- Re: All life was destroyed at the end of the dinosaur',
John Harshman
- Re: All life was destroyed at the end of the dinosaur',
JTEM
- Re: All life was destroyed at the end of the dinosaur',
Nick Keighley
- Re: All life was destroyed at the end of the dinosaur',
John Bode
- Re: All life was destroyed at the end of the dinosaur',
J.J. O'Shea
Re: News: Evolution Exposed on the Big Screen,
bob
Re: Science Disproves Evolution,
John Harshman
Re: Funny: If Religion Made Bras,
Ben Standeven
What would you come back as?,
Earle Jones
Re: What would you come back as?,
Will in New Haven
Re: What would you come back as?,
Dick
Re: What would you come back as?,
snex
Re: What would you come back as?,
Jim Willemin
Re: What would you come back as?,
Robert Carnegie
Re: What would you come back as?,
Gary Bohn
Re: What would you come back as?,
William Wingstedt
Re: What would you come back as?,
Denis Loubet
Re: What would you come back as?,
chris thompson
Re: What would you come back as?,
Dick
Re: What would you come back as?,
Kermit
Re: What would you come back as?,
Mike Dworetsky
Re: What would you come back as?,
Frank J
Survey: 61 Percent Agree with Evolution,
Homer Sapiens
Re: What happened to miracles?,
curtjester1
Miracles,
Earle Jones
- Re: Miracles,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Miracles,
Dwib
- Re: Miracles,
alextangent
- Re: Miracles,
Sir Frederick
- Re: Miracles,
eerok
- Re: Miracles,
Milan
- Re: Miracles,
Inez
- Re: Miracles,
Dick C
- Re: Miracles,
corky
- Re: Miracles,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Miracles,
Rusty Sites
- Re: Miracles,
Greg G.
- Re: Miracles,
Ivar Ylvisaker
- Re: Miracles,
Robert Weldon
- Re: Miracles,
Gary Bohn
- Re: Miracles,
Rolf
- Re: Miracles,
Gregory A Greenman
- Re: Miracles,
Jenny Brien
- Re: Miracles,
Earle Jones
- Re: Miracles,
Gregory A Greenman
- Re: Miracles,
snex
- Re: Miracles,
Free Lunch
- Re: Miracles,
James Goetz
- Re: Miracles,
Free Lunch
- Re: Miracles,
John McKendry
- Re: Miracles,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Miracles,
John McKendry
- Re: Miracles,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Miracles,
gregwrld
- Re: Miracles,
snex
- Re: Miracles,
Geoff
- Re: Miracles,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Miracles,
Geoff
- Re: Miracles,
LT
- Re: Miracles,
James Goetz
- Re: Miracles,
snex
- Re: Miracles,
James Goetz
- Re: Miracles,
snex
- Re: Miracles,
James Goetz
- Re: Miracles,
Inez
- Re: Miracles,
James Goetz
- Re: Miracles,
snex
- Re: Miracles,
James Goetz
- Re: Miracles,
snex
- Re: Miracles,
James Goetz
- Re: Miracles,
snex
- Re: Miracles,
James Goetz
- Re: Miracles,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Miracles,
James Goetz
- Re: Miracles,
AC
- Re: Miracles,
James Goetz
- Re: Miracles,
AC
- Re: Miracles,
snex
- Re: Miracles,
James Goetz
- Re: Miracles,
snex
- Re: Miracles,
James Goetz
- Re: Miracles,
snex
- Re: Miracles,
James Goetz
- Re: Miracles,
snex
- Re: Miracles,
James Goetz
- Re: Miracles,
snex
- Re: Miracles,
James Goetz
- Re: Miracles,
snex
- Re: Miracles,
James Goetz
- Re: Miracles,
John Wilkins
- Re: Miracles,
snex
- Re: Miracles,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Miracles,
James Goetz
- Re: Miracles,
Ursa Gamma
- Re: Miracles,
AC
- Re: Miracles,
Ursa Gamma
- Re: Miracles,
snex
- Re: Miracles,
Ursa Gamma
- Re: Miracles,
snex
- Re: Miracles,
AC
- Re: Miracles,
Ursa Gamma
- Re: Miracles,
Ursa Gamma
- Re: Miracles,
Dan Drake
- Re: Miracles,
Ursa Gamma
- Re: Miracles,
Dick C
- Re: Re: Miracles,
Ye Old One
- Re: Miracles,
AC
- Re: Miracles,
Ursa Gamma
- Re: Miracles,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: Miracles,
AC
- Re: Re: Miracles,
Ye Old One
- Re: Miracles,
Ursa Gamma
- Re: Miracles,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: Miracles,
Earle Jones
- Re: Miracles,
the heekster
- Re: Miracles,
AC
- Re: Miracles,
snex
- Re: Miracles,
Ursa Gamma
- Re: Miracles,
AC
- Re: Miracles,
James Goetz
- Re: Miracles,
Ursa Gamma
- Re: Miracles,
hhyapster
- Re: Miracles,
Ursa Gamma
- Re: Miracles,
Ursa Gamma
- Re: Miracles,
AC
- Re: Miracles,
James Goetz
- Re: Miracles,
eyelessgame
Ping Catshark...,
chris thompson
A treatise on how one willfully becomes an atheist,
Dave in Lake Villa
- Re: A treatise on how one willfully becomes an atheist,
wf3h
- Re: A treatise on how one willfully becomes an atheist,
Cheezits
- Re: A treatise on how one willfully becomes an atheist,
louann_m@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A treatise on how one willfully becomes an atheist,
Sir Frederick
- Re: A treatise on how one willfully becomes an atheist,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: A treatise on how one willfully becomes an atheist,
Kermit
- Re: A treatise on how one willfully becomes an atheist,
Lee Jay
- Re: A treatise on how one willfully becomes an atheist,
richardalanforrest
- Re: A treatise on how one willfully becomes an atheist,
John Bode
- Re: A treatise on how one willfully becomes an atheist,
eroot
- Re: A treatise on how one willfully becomes an atheist,
Inez
- Re: A treatise on how one willfully becomes an atheist,
Davej
- Re: A treatise on how one willfully becomes an atheist,
Iain
- Re: A treatise on how one willfully becomes an atheist,
Desertphile
- Re: A treatise on how one willfully becomes an atheist,
Vosotros
- Re: A treatise on how one willfully becomes an atheist,
Rusty Sites
- Re: A treatise on how one willfully becomes an atheist,
Sketch System
- Re: A treatise on how one willfully becomes an atheist,
max maypo
- Re: A treatise on how one willfully becomes an atheist,
Kilmir
- Re: A treatise on how one willfully becomes an atheist,
The Enigmatic One
- Re: A treatise on how one willfully becomes an atheist,
Jackson Pillock
- Re: A treatise on how one willfully becomes an atheist,
conrad
A better word for "falsifiable"?,
Paul Ciszek
- Message not available
- Re: A better word for "falsifiable"?,
LSR
- Re: A better word for "falsifiable"?,
benb
- Re: A better word for "falsifiable"?,
TomS
- Re: A better word for "falsifiable"?,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: A better word for "falsifiable"?,
LT
- Re: A better word for "falsifiable"?,
Bob T.
- Re: A better word for "falsifiable"?,
Treus
- Re: A better word for "falsifiable"?,
William Wingstedt
- Re: A better word for "falsifiable"?,
noctiluca
- Re: A better word for "falsifiable"?,
Timberwoof
- Re: A better word for "falsifiable"?,
David Canzi -- non-mailable
- Re: A better word for "falsifiable"?,
Sketch System
- Re: A better word for "falsifiable"?,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: A better word for "falsifiable"?,
Bob Casanova
- Message not available
- Re: A better word for "falsifiable"?,
Mark Isaak
- Re: A better word for "falsifiable"?,
Robert Carnegie
Morrison Formation and plant fossils. More from the PPU....,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Morrison Formation and plant fossils. More from the PPU....,
Inez
- Re: Morrison Formation and plant fossils. More from the PPU....,
Seanpit
- Re: Morrison Formation and plant fossils. More from the PPU....,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Morrison Formation and plant fossils. More from the PPU....,
Seanpit
- Re: Morrison Formation and plant fossils. More from the PPU....,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Morrison Formation and plant fossils. More from the PPU....,
Greg G.
- Re: Morrison Formation and plant fossils. More from the PPU....,
richardalanforrest
- Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
Seanpit
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
Seanpit
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
Glenn
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
Seanpit
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
Seanpit
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
John Stockwell
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
Seanpit
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
John Stockwell
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
Glenn
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
John Harshman
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
Seanpit
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
John Harshman
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
Glenn
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
John Harshman
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
Glenn
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
John Harshman
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
Glenn
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
John Harshman
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
Glenn
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
John Harshman
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
Glenn
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
Seanpit
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
Glenn
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
John Harshman
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
Glenn
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
Seanpit
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
Glenn
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
John Harshman
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
Glenn
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
John Stockwell
- Re: Termite Nests in the Morrison?,
Ron O
- Re: Morrison Formation and plant fossils. More from the PPU....,
_Arthur
OT: Can Atheists Be Parents? A Judge says No!,
Homer Sapiens
In the News: Mounting Evidence for Intelligent Design Discovered in 2007,
Jason Spaceman
Re: Public service announcement: Dana's contradictions?,
Inez
Re: OT: Public service announcement- Ad Hominem,
Caranx latus
The Neaderthal Yo-Yo (Neanderthals Ancestors to Modern Man),
JTEM
Re: Neo Creationism ( Wikipedia ),
John Wilkins
Evolution Education Is A 'Must' Says Coalition Of Scientific And,
Homer Sapiens
Alpha Males,
titanimage@xxxxxxxxx
Re: Electoral Compass,
Jackson Pillock
Re: Can ID be Tested?,
urillan
Good Stuff,
Primary AL
Genetic Engineering and Vitamin C,
Harvest Dancer
Re: [OT] Electoral Compass,
AC
Message not available
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [OT] Electoral Compass,
Earle Jones
Evolution in a petri dish,
Tumblemark
James Burke has all his work on Google vids,
Terry
Re: "The Quest for Right": A Creationist Attack On Quantum Mechanics,
cybertag3
Re: The Artifact Hypothesis,
John Stockwell
I'm disappointed,
Harry K
- Re: I'm disappointed,
Stile4aly
- Re: I'm disappointed,
TomS
- Re: I'm disappointed,
raven1
- Re: I'm disappointed,
Iago
- Re: I'm disappointed,
Frank J
- Re: I'm disappointed,
Klaus H
- Re: I'm disappointed,
John Wilkins
- Re: I'm disappointed,
Stuart
- Re: I'm disappointed,
Walter Bushell
- Re: I'm disappointed,
Free Lunch
- Re: I'm disappointed,
John Wilkins
- Re: I'm disappointed,
John McKendry
- Re: I'm disappointed,
John Wilkins
- Re: I'm disappointed,
Walter Bushell
- Re: I'm disappointed,
Walter Bushell
- Re: I'm disappointed,
Wombat
- Re: I'm disappointed,
Bob Casanova
- Re: I'm disappointed,
Andre Lieven
- Re: I'm disappointed,
Bob Casanova
- Re: I'm disappointed,
Joe Cummings
- Re: I'm disappointed,
Ray Martinez
- Re: I'm disappointed,
Frank J
Three pictures worth 1000 ID threads,
louann_m@xxxxxxxxx
Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
chris thompson
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
richardalanforrest
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Ray Martinez
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
John Stockwell
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Ray Martinez
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
richardalanforrest
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Gary Bohn
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Seanpit
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
richardalanforrest
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Seanpit
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
richardalanforrest
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Seanpit
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Glenn
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Martin Kaletsch
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Glenn
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
chris thompson
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Glenn
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
chris thompson
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Glenn
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Bill Hudson
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Glenn
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Seanpit
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
_Arthur
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Glenn
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
hersheyh
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Glenn
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
_Arthur
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Glenn
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
_Arthur
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Glenn
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Andre Lieven
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
richardalanforrest
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Glenn
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
richardalanforrest
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Glenn
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
richardalanforrest
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Glenn
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
John Wilkins
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
TomS
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Walter Bushell
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Ben Standeven
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
hersheyh
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Klaus H
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Gary Bohn
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
chris thompson
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
richardalanforrest
- High Resolution GPS Location and Orientation Mapping,
Seanpit
- Re: High Resolution GPS Location and Orientation Mapping,
richardalanforrest
- Re: High Resolution GPS Location and Orientation Mapping,
Seanpit
- Re: High Resolution GPS Location and Orientation Mapping,
richardalanforrest
- Re: High Resolution GPS Location and Orientation Mapping,
Seanpit
- Re: High Resolution GPS Location and Orientation Mapping,
chris thompson
- Re: High Resolution GPS Location and Orientation Mapping,
Glenn
- Re: High Resolution GPS Location and Orientation Mapping,
Martin Kaletsch
- Re: High Resolution GPS Location and Orientation Mapping,
JAlexander
- Re: High Resolution GPS Location and Orientation Mapping,
John Harshman
- Re: High Resolution GPS Location and Orientation Mapping,
Glenn
- Re: High Resolution GPS Location and Orientation Mapping,
Seanpit
- Re: High Resolution GPS Location and Orientation Mapping,
_Arthur
- Re: High Resolution GPS Location and Orientation Mapping,
Seanpit
- Re: High Resolution GPS Location and Orientation Mapping,
_Arthur
- Re: High Resolution GPS Location and Orientation Mapping,
Glenn
- Re: High Resolution GPS Location and Orientation Mapping,
Glenn
- Re: High Resolution GPS Location and Orientation Mapping,
Earle Jones
- Re: High Resolution GPS Location and Orientation Mapping,
alextangent
- Re: High Resolution GPS Location and Orientation Mapping,
richardalanforrest
- Re: High Resolution GPS Location and Orientation Mapping,
alextangent
- Re: High Resolution GPS Location and Orientation Mapping,
Earle Jones
- Re: High Resolution GPS Location and Orientation Mapping,
alextangent
- Re: High Resolution GPS Location and Orientation Mapping,
Seanpit
- Re: High Resolution GPS Location and Orientation Mapping,
alextangent
- Re: High Resolution GPS Location and Orientation Mapping,
Seanpit
- Re: High Resolution GPS Location and Orientation Mapping,
Jim Willemin
- Re: High Resolution GPS Location and Orientation Mapping,
Bill Hudson
- Re: High Resolution GPS Location and Orientation Mapping,
William Wingstedt
- Re: High Resolution GPS Location and Orientation Mapping,
alextangent
- Re: High Resolution GPS Location and Orientation Mapping,
Seanpit
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Glenn
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Jim Willemin
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Inez
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
John Stockwell
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Glenn
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
richardalanforrest
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Glenn
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
richardalanforrest
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Glenn
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
richardalanforrest
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Glenn
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
RAM
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
richardalanforrest
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
TomS
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Ray Martinez
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
richardalanforrest
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Ray Martinez
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
richardalanforrest
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Ray Martinez
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
richardalanforrest
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
eroot
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Ben Standeven
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
_Arthur
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
richardalanforrest
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Lee Jay
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
chris thompson
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
richardalanforrest
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Dana Tweedy
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: More from the Pitman parallel universe....,
Dick
Re: Arp Re: In the News: Gonzalez to hold press conference,
Rolf
Re: Discussion of von Rad's _Genesis: A Commentary_,
Rolf
The Evolution of Protein Interactions: Behe Challenged Again,
Switch89
Re: The Current Universe Being Observed Is No Longer There,
Primary AL
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: The Current Universe Being Observed Is No Longer There,
Primary AL
- Re: The Current Universe Being Observed Is No Longer There,
Primary AL
- Re: The Current Universe Being Observed Is No Longer There,
Primary AL
- Re: The Current Universe Being Observed Is No Longer There,
Primary AL
- Re: The Current Universe Being Observed Is No Longer There,
Primary AL
- Re: The Current Universe Being Observed Is No Longer There,
Primary AL
- Re: The Current Universe Being Observed Is No Longer There,
Primary AL
- Re: The Current Universe Being Observed Is No Longer There,
Primary AL
- Re: The Current Universe Being Observed Is No Longer There,
Primary AL
- Re: The Current Universe Being Observed Is No Longer There,
Primary AL
- Re: The Current Universe Being Observed Is No Longer There,
Primary AL
- Re: The Current Universe Being Observed Is No Longer There,
Christopher Denney
- Re: The Current Universe Being Observed Is No Longer There,
The Enigmatic One
- Re: The Current Universe Being Observed Is No Longer There,
AC
- Re: The Current Universe Being Observed Is No Longer There,
Dustan
- Re: The Current Universe Being Observed Is No Longer There,
Dustan
Re: Chez Watt Ballot Vote 1 January 2008,
Free Lunch
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot Vote 1 January 2008,
Mr tiktaalik
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot Vote 1 January 2008,
David Hare-Scott
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot Vote 1 January 2008,
John Wilkins
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot Vote 1 January 2008,
Greg G.
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot Vote 1 January 2008,
The Last Conformist
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot Vote 1 January 2008,
The Last Conformist
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot Vote 1 January 2008,
Lee Jay
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot Vote 1 January 2008,
Inez
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot Vote 1 January 2008,
Noelie S. Alito
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot Vote 1 January 2008,
rthearle@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot Vote 1 January 2008,
Seamus
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot Vote 1 January 2008,
louann_m@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot Vote 1 January 2008,
Richard Clayton
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot Vote 1 January 2008,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot Vote 1 January 2008,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot Vote 1 January 2008,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot Vote 1 January 2008,
Cheezits
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot Vote 1 January 2008,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot Vote 1 January 2008,
Gary Bohn
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot Vote 1 January 2008,
Susan S
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot Vote 1 January 2008,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot Vote 1 January 2008,
AC
Re: Richard says Rupert Morrish is wrong,
Bill Morse
Slightly OT:Racial IQ Bias Experiment,
Shane
Re: Religious Tolerance view on the conflict,
Primary AL
Re: More questions for creationists,
Inez
Re: More for Mihos, was Re: Rush Limbaugh, Astrophysicist,
Robert Carnegie
Dawkins changes his mind,
Rupert Morrish
Re: Dawkins changes his mind,
Martin Golding
Re: Why do we have two kidneys?,
Dan Drake
Re: Rush Limbaugh, Astrophysicist,
Dan Drake
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Rush Limbaugh, Astrophysicist,
Robert Grumbine
- Re: Rush Limbaugh, Astrophysicist,
Puppet_Sock
- Re: Rush Limbaugh, Astrophysicist,
Skitter_the_Cat
- Re: Rush Limbaugh, Astrophysicist,
Skitter_the_Cat
- Re: Rush Limbaugh, Astrophysicist,
Skitter_the_Cat
Could it Possibly Be...Ray the Troubadour??,
Homer Sapiens
Re: Belly Buttons?,
Inez
Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Inez
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Glenn
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Glenn
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Glenn
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Glenn
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Glenn
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Chez Watt Re: Co-optation Today,
eerok
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Inez
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Inez
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Glenn
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Inez
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Glenn
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Inez
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Glenn
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Inez
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Glenn
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Ron O
- Re: Co-optation Today,
chris thompson
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
chris thompson
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Ron O
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Ron O
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Inez
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Inez
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Ron O
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Ron O
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Ron O
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Cheezits
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Ron O
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Vend
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Greg G.
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
The Last Conformist
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Vend
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
r norman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Wilkins
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Cheezits
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Inez
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Inez
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
r norman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Greg Guarino
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
AC
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
r norman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Wilkins
- Re: Co-optation Today,
r norman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
r norman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Glenn
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
noctiluca
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
noctiluca
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Co-optation Today,
chris thompson
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)
- Re: Co-optation Today,
AC
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Co-optation Today,
r norman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Greg Guarino
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Inez
- Re: Co-optation Today,
TomS
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Inez
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
_Arthur
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
_Arthur
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
_Arthur
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
_Arthur
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Wilkins
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Wilkins
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Wilkins
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Inez
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Inez
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Chez Watt: Was Re: Co-optation Today,
chris thompson
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Wilkins
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Glenn
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Glenn
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Glenn
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
r norman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Harshman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
r norman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)
- Re: Co-optation Today,
r norman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Glenn
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Wilkins
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Glenn
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Treus
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Wilkins
- Re: Co-optation Today,
r norman
- Re: Co-optation Today,
John Wilkins
- Message not available
- Re: Co-optation Today,
TomS
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Rupert Morrish
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Glenn
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Rupert Morrish
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Glenn
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Rupert Morrish
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Glenn
- Re: Co-optation Today,
Rupert Morrish