Re: History Channel special on astrobiology
- From: Martin Andersen <dur@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:41:05 +0100
verulam wrote:
On Jan 31, 9:12 am, j.wilki...@xxxxxxxxx (John Wilkins) wrote:It's not dogmatism, it's logic.J. J. Lodder <nos...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Elmer <nylic...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:So why do creationists seem to have such a problem understanding it? WeOveris wrote:Now if that isn't a trueism,They claim abiogenesis is link to evolution.Life had to start before evolution could occur.
seem to have to say that evolution doesn't include the origin of life or
the universe on a daily basis.
--
John S. Wilkins, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Philosophy
University of Queensland - Blog: scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts
This is an oft-repeated claim that seems to me a piece of dogmatism.
Unless you claim to know the mechanism for the emergence of life, I
fail to see how you can claim that life did not emerge as a result of
an evolutionary process. In my opinion, it almost certainly did.
If it evolves, it replicates with variation.
If it replicates with variation, it is alive.
If it is alive, abiogenesis already happened.
It is possible life can be incredibly more simple than we imagine now, but that just pushes the boundary back for what could be defined as abiogenesis. Maybe some day the term will be so narrowly applicable that it is trivial and abandoned all together.
.
- References:
- Re: History Channel special on astrobiology
- From: Elmer
- Re: History Channel special on astrobiology
- From: J. J. Lodder
- Re: History Channel special on astrobiology
- From: John Wilkins
- Re: History Channel special on astrobiology
- From: verulam
- Re: History Channel special on astrobiology
- Prev by Date: Re: Blog: Questions for "Evolutionists".
- Next by Date: Re: Blue-eyed Humans Have A Single, Common Ancestor
- Previous by thread: Re: History Channel special on astrobiology
- Next by thread: Re: History Channel special on astrobiology
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|