Re: Blue-eyed Humans Have A Single, Common Ancestor
- From: snex <snex@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:29:31 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 31, 12:14 pm, Padmar Mushkin <x...@xxx> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:42:59 -0800, John Harshman
<jharshman.diespam...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Padmar Mushkin wrote:
On 31 Jan 2008 04:58:19 -0800, TomS <TomS_mem...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Blue-eyed Humans Have A Single, Common Ancestor
"ScienceDaily (Jan. 31, 2008) -- New research shows that
people with blue eyes have a single, common ancestor.
A team at the University of Copenhagen have tracked
down a genetic mutation which took place 6-10,000 years
ago and is the cause of the eye colour of all blue-eyed
humans alive on the planet today."
<http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080130170343.htm>
-or-
<http://snipurl.com/1ynxh>
Cue Harshman with his science journalism rant.
Actually, this seems remarkably restrained. No claims that "Darwin was
wrong" or "this revolutionizes biology". Just a simple and fairly
obvious finding. What's the problem?
I guess I could be being overly pedantic, but "single common
ancestor" is a weak description. Everybody has a common ancestor; in
fact many common ancestors.
its possible that blue eyes evolved on multiple separate occasions.
the research in the OP suggests it only evolved once.
.
- References:
- Blue-eyed Humans Have A Single, Common Ancestor
- From: TomS
- Re: Blue-eyed Humans Have A Single, Common Ancestor
- From: Padmar Mushkin
- Re: Blue-eyed Humans Have A Single, Common Ancestor
- From: John Harshman
- Re: Blue-eyed Humans Have A Single, Common Ancestor
- From: Padmar Mushkin
- Blue-eyed Humans Have A Single, Common Ancestor
- Prev by Date: Re: OK, I just posted on Dembski's site!
- Next by Date: Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled"
- Previous by thread: Re: Blue-eyed Humans Have A Single, Common Ancestor
- Next by thread: Re: Blue-eyed Humans Have A Single, Common Ancestor
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|