Re: Co-optation Today

r norman wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 19:51:20 -0800, John Harshman
<jharshman.diespamdie@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Here: a nested hierarchy is a set of groups in which each group has one of two relationships with each other group; either the two groups are wholly disjunct, or one group is entirely included within the other. Partially overlapping groups are right out. Phylogenies can further be described as natural nested hierarchies: only one hierarchical arrangement of groups will work.

Actually a nested hierarchy is simply a directed rooted tree
structure, that is, an connected graph without cycles where each node
has no more than one parent (edge directed toward the node) and has
zero or more children (edge leaving the node). Such trees are
commonplace in programming.

No, a nested hierarchy can be *represented* as a tree structure. It can be represented in other ways too, for example by Venn diagrams. Programming structures are not natural nested hierarchies, i.e. they are imposed by fiat rather than arising out of the characteristics of the elements. One could rearrange those elements freely into a different hierarchy. As such, it's similar to any arbitrary division. The geologic time scale is a nested hierarchy too, with eons, eras, periods, epochs, and ages. But it's not a natural one. We do make nested hierarchies all the time, but they just don't have the features of a natural hierarchy, the sort that results from common descent.

.

Loading