Re: Religious Tolerance view on the conflict

On Dec 29 2007, 10:31 am, Kermit <unrestrained_h...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
From:http://www.religioustolerance.org/evolutio.htm

"The meaning of terms:

It is our policy to use the terms by which various groups describe
themselves. But sometimes this can be deceptive. A "theory" may be
much more than a theory; a "science" may be not a science at all:
*** The term "theory" in science can mean something much different
from the same word in general use. The Theory of Evolution of plant
and animal species is far more than a simple idea; it is well beyond a
hunch; many leading scientists consider it an ---------------------established fact. -------------------------It is
the foundational belief upon which many branches of science are based.
Dr. Gerald Wheeler, director of the National Science Teachers
Association said in 1999-OCT: "Everything is a theory, but...
[evolution is] probably the biggest unifying theory that exists in all
of science."

That's because it is the theory bringing the most hope to the non-
"primary universal mind" No God, No creator, No Intelligent Design, No
Purposeful Plan---------- argument. The energy behind this
denomination of Evolution Theory comes from more than an objective,
disconnected non-ideological mindset. Even the hopeful Atheist Astro
physicists Sects are using Evolution Theory to bolster their big bang
theory and vise versa.) They both need a finite, measurable universe,
and have thusly, constructed a formula that provides the answers they
need--- i.e. the "Big Bang Formula" and a 14 billion year old
(delightfully measurable) universe.

Oh how they want their canonization as -accurate Science- working on a
topic of study that has "evolved" into "scientific fact."

It is inconvenient for ideologues in "Space Origin Theory" and
"Evolution Theory" (once thoroughly honest institutions) to work with
an essentially static universe due to an -endless- series of big and
small "bang" universes, all mixed together forever; making galaxies
and other phenomenon that for all probable and practical purposes *is
always here,* *** (Einstein theory)

If either the theory of evolution or an old Earth were to
be proven incorrect, then our understanding of many different sciences
would collapse.

Exactly. They tend to sacrifice their scientific objectivity to
protect each other's theories. The 14 billion year old universe/Big
Bang theory, fabricated by minds inferior to Einstein has, aided the
Origin Theory Evolutionary Extremist Sects. Learning of the prospects
for Darwin's Theory becoming a powerful new tool for eradication of
religious beliefs began representing legitimate theorizing *about
plant and animal adaptations* as something far more powerful than the
studies were ever intended for. This hurt, more than helped the
theories organic growth.

*** Various U.S. court decisions have concluded that "creation
science" is not actually science. This is because the beliefs of
creation scientists cannot be falsified. That is, it would be
impossible for a creation scientist to accept a proof that their
beliefs are false and that naturalistic or theistic evolution is true.
That is because their fundamental, foundational belief is that the
creation stories in the Book of Genesis are inspired by God and are
thus inerrant. All physical evidence is judged by comparing it to
their interpretation of Genesis. No evidence from nature can disprove
this belief. Once a person accepts a religious text as the basis of
their scientific studies, they no longer are free to follow where the
data leads. They cease being a scientist."

The believers of the big bang theory from a tiny, tiny, tiny, spec
which no one understands, and no one can comprehend or see, which no
one has ever seen, which contains none of the characteristics of
atomic reality, is a unique one in pseudo science. It, like the
Genesis theory cannot be dis-proven, yet hypocritically, the National
Science Teachers Association (Union) ignores this non-scientific
similarity quite willingly.


And excellent and detailed look at the many, many religious myths
which are contradicted by science, and the ways a theist can
accommodate reality and keep his/her religious beliefs,

Also a good explanation of the conflict and issues for non-scientists.
Now that I think of it, also a good presentation of the religious
issues involved, for non-theistic scientists.

Kermit

***Correct tense in this scenario according to Einstein, who died
totally disbelieving in the worth of a -big bang from a little "Super
Dot"-into-all-the-mass-and-energy there is now...... ...theory. This was a
fanciful, desperate, laughable theory born of frustration. In his
eyes, the grand new theory of a non-static universe was born from the
need to have troubling questions answered.

In addition, what was going on was concern for the continued expansion
and funding for space exploration, and for extraneous related
suffering sister Evolution Theory in its obsessive quest for -
actuality, and accuracy; the necessary criteria for, and acceptance
into the very liberally funded world of Scientific Theory.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Challenge for Darwinists - Protein Synthesis
    ... explained by evolution in small incremental steps, ... Science does not claim to know all the answers. ... species or new species? ... The scientists involved seem quite happy with it. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Grade My Work
    ... entitled "Science And Technology In Science" a final year module ... There are also examples of Darwinian evolution being used to justify ... deserving of special rights due to a uniqueness of our creation ... some concern amongst both scientists and non scientists, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Mechanical Light
    ... community has instead accepted light theories contradicting the science ... is the "particle wave" of neutrinos just like that sound is the ... anywhere in the universe. ... For example, scientists have found ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Honest Creationists Argument wanted
    ... I would think that most scientists have no intention of being dishonest ... science. ... DNA strands. ... parts of the theory of evolution) that can be presented rather easily. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Honest Creationists Argument wanted
    ... I would think that most scientists have no intention of being dishonest ... science. ... DNA strands. ... parts of the theory of evolution) that can be presented rather easily. ...
    (talk.origins)
Loading