Re: More Ad Hom
- From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:36:13 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 20, 3:56 pm, Glenn <GlennShel...@xxxxxxx> wrote:nst me.
Your dishonest misrepresentation of what I responded to.
Oh dear, Glenn.
Let's get this straight:
Here is Mark VandeWettering's post:
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.origins/msg/706b44b506fe1aea
Anyone can read it in full to see which questions you have snipped and
evaded. It's a long post, so I won't post it in full.
Here is your response *IN FULL*
"Tha tha tha thats it folks."
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.origins/msg/6aa91deaf2ca689d
What is dishonest about that, Glenn? I have posted you entire
response, have not edited it in any way, and provided a link to both
your post and the post to which it was "responding".
You are not preaching to a bunch of ignorant creationists here whom
you can distract with unfounded assertions of dishonesty. You are
shown to be dishonest by your own words and your own posting history
which anyone can confirm simply by checking back up the thread.
Pathetic.
RF
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: More Ad Hom
- From: Glenn
- Re: More Ad Hom
- References:
- More Ad Hom
- From: Glenn
- Re: More Ad Hom
- From: Glenn
- Re: More Ad Hom
- From: richardalanforrest
- Re: More Ad Hom
- From: Glenn
- Re: More Ad Hom
- From: richardalanforrest
- Re: More Ad Hom
- From: Glenn
- Re: More Ad Hom
- From: richardalanforrest
- Re: More Ad Hom
- From: Glenn
- Re: More Ad Hom
- From: richardalanforrest
- Re: More Ad Hom
- From: Glenn
- Re: More Ad Hom
- From: richardalanforrest
- Re: More Ad Hom
- From: Glenn
- More Ad Hom
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: Once again Inez delves into the murky waters of philosophy.
- Next by Date: Re: Commentary: Let's open minds, textbooks to intelligent design
- Previous by thread: Re: More Ad Hom
- Next by thread: Re: More Ad Hom
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|