Re: More Ad Hom

On Dec 18, 11:03 am, richardalanforr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Dec 18, 5:54 pm, Glenn <GlennShel...@xxxxxxx> wrote:





On Dec 18, 10:35 am, richardalanforr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:> On Dec 18, 5:32 pm, Glenn <GlennShel...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

On Dec 18, 10:20 am, richardalanforr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:> On Dec 18, 5:16 pm, Glenn <GlennShel...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
<snipped> Would you deny that a person's mental state can

affect his outlook, their work and conclusions?

I suggest that you consider this in the light of your own behaviour.

I try to. It's easier to imagine other's problems though, eh Richard.

No Glenn. I'd hate to imagine what is going on in the incoherent sewer
of your mind.

So the desire to insult me calls you to irrationality. It is easier to
see other peoples problems than it is to see your own. Your own
behavior contradicts your claim.

I don't "desire to insult" you, Glenn. I insult you because your
behaviour on this forum is dishonest, arrogant, infantile and
ignorant.

So you don't want to insult me, but you do. And you'd "hate to
imagine" what goes on in my mind, but you do.
You're beginning to sound like a loon and not just stupid, Richard.
Seems you have a following of same as well.
Don't think that you are insulting me, consider that you are insulting
yourself when you make all these claims
yet don't make one whit of effort in supporting them even when
challenged to do so.

You see, there is a difference between us. When I attack and accuse
you of something, it is almost alway in direct context to an ongoing
event.
For example, the last time was when I challenged your claim about the
DI "acknowledging" that ID isn't scientific. Your behavior
in that thread called for "insult".
When you attack, it is like in this thread. No support, just like an
delinquent lashing out using whatever words he can think of. And it
should show
that you have some problem with me other than belief in your insults.

I don't think it irrational to detest someone who is blatantly
dishonest and crows about their moral superiority.

Really, Richard. Don't you think that "blatant" behavior and "crowing"
would be easy to document? Or can't you be bothered to back up what
you say.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Fox: Jackson used N-word in crude off-air remarks
    ... usually an insult from outsiders. ... I don't mind niggers ... There's a big difference between black people using the word "nigger" ... nigger or queer. ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: Bloomberg for President
    ... I've since changed my mind. ... Mind you, since you made the rape comments, you had never ... more an insult than people continue make regarding Patrick or anyone else. ... apologize here. ...
    (rec.music.artists.springsteen)
  • Re: Mission Impossible
    ... Zetsu> The entire profession of ophthalmology is an insult to the ... totally ignore the fact that the mind is not an objective instrument. ... We see through our mind. ... But your patients remain blind, ...
    (sci.med.vision)
  • Re: Fox: Jackson used N-word in crude off-air remarks
    ... usually an insult from outsiders. ... except with a gay person he knows very well and ... I don't mind niggers ... hmmmm...so it's okay for one set of folks to use a term, ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: Fox: Jackson used N-word in crude off-air remarks
    ... usually an insult from outsiders. ... except with a gay person he knows very well and ... I don't mind niggers ... My kids, being black, use "nigger" all the time and I cringe. ...
    (soc.retirement)