Re: Reproductive Selection



Treus wrote:
John Harshman wrote:

<snip>

Why, even if you were correct about all this, would that make evolution
without natural selection?

<snip>

The evolution of R(S1,x) to R(S2,x) where R(S1,S2)<R(S1,S1) requires
S1 to evolve contrary its advange under reproductive selection (which
acts on the post-mating capacity to generate offspring). What other
form of natural selection could govern such a development?

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Harry Potter saved my life today
    ... how is natural selection phasing them out? ... rate before people have offspring if they have wisdom teeth, ... Many do indeed die of wisdom tooth complications (Ramses II comes to ...
    (alt.fan.harry-potter)
  • Re: random walk mutation
    ... black, white, and ivory would make nine. ... If anybody has worked out a theory of how natural selection has PERFORMED ... take into account how all the little interim increments click into place. ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Re: Reproductive Selection
    ... S1 to evolve contrary its advange under reproductive selection (which ... acts on the post-mating capacity to generate offspring). ... form of natural selection could govern such a development? ... and which mere unnamed clades within genera. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Evidence for the Laws of Intelligence
    ... natural selection must depend on whatever ... and at the mercy of random changes. ... reproducing by budding or splitting, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Modern synthesis on Wikipedia - what is it ?
    ... If natural selection "ordered" something, ... Most of us are pessimistic about explaining anything to someone who ... Perhaps you could offer the formal definition of the ...
    (talk.origins)