Re: Science = 100% falsifiability? Really?
- From: Seanpit <seanpitnospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:53:34 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 13, 9:27 am, richardalanforr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
< snip >
These particular ideas are already mainstream. There is no need to
write them up. You are the one out on a limb here.
So which scientific journal has published a paper in which some has
applied statistical tests to a set of objects to determine if they are
the product of "deliberate" or "non-deliberate" forces?
Of course there's no such paper!
Do just a little reading in journals dealing with forensic science or
your own field of interest, anthropology. SETI scientists have also
published various criteria for determining deliberate vs. non-
deliberate phenomena. All of these fields of science have to do with
determining certain likely limits to non-deliberate processes of
nature.
More bull***, Sean.
I don't see anyone coming to your side on this one . . . even in this
forum. Now that should tell you something.
RF
Sean Pitman
www.DetectingDesign.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Science = 100% falsifiability? Really?
- From: richardalanforrest
- Re: Science = 100% falsifiability? Really?
- From: Garamond Lethe
- Re: Science = 100% falsifiability? Really?
- References:
- Re: The philosophical Turkey: The difference between verification and
- From: Seanpit
- Re: The philosophical Turkey: The difference between verification and
- From: richardalanforrest
- Science = 100% falsifiability? Really?
- From: Seanpit
- Re: Science = 100% falsifiability? Really?
- From: Free Lunch
- Re: Science = 100% falsifiability? Really?
- From: Seanpit
- Re: Science = 100% falsifiability? Really?
- From: Free Lunch
- Re: Science = 100% falsifiability? Really?
- From: Seanpit
- Re: Science = 100% falsifiability? Really?
- From: Bob Casanova
- Re: Science = 100% falsifiability? Really?
- From: Seanpit
- Re: Science = 100% falsifiability? Really?
- From: richardalanforrest
- Re: Science = 100% falsifiability? Really?
- From: Seanpit
- Re: Science = 100% falsifiability? Really?
- From: richardalanforrest
- Re: The philosophical Turkey: The difference between verification and
- Prev by Date: Re: increase in information represented by DNA
- Next by Date: Re: The Reasonable Minority
- Previous by thread: Re: Science = 100% falsifiability? Really?
- Next by thread: Re: Science = 100% falsifiability? Really?
- Index(es):