Re: Science = 100% falsifiability? Really?

On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:18:12 -0800 (PST), the following
appeared in talk.origins, posted by Seanpit
<seanpitnospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

On Dec 12, 4:09 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Many different claims have been shown to be false because the evidence
shows they are false. Few scientists see any point in further piling on
evidence to further show that a false claim is false. Adding absolutism
to your argument shows nothing but a grasp at any straw -- an attempt to
take a very practical, pragmatic approach to learning, and turn it into
some idealized perfection that, not so incidentally, destroys it.

Exactly! Now, try explaining that concept to Richard.

Where did Richard claim otherwise?
--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless

.

Relevant Pages
Quantcast