Re: Science = 100% falsifiability? Really?

On Dec 12, 4:09 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Many different claims have been shown to be false because the evidence
shows they are false. Few scientists see any point in further piling on
evidence to further show that a false claim is false. Adding absolutism
to your argument shows nothing but a grasp at any straw -- an attempt to
take a very practical, pragmatic approach to learning, and turn it into
some idealized perfection that, not so incidentally, destroys it.

Exactly! Now, try explaining that concept to Richard.

Sean Pitman
www.DetectingDesign.com

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Science = 100% falsifiability? Really?
    ... Few scientists see any point in further piling on ... evidence to further show that a false claim is false. ... Where did Richard claim otherwise? ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Evolution and Observation Gap
    ... 100% evidence either way is not generally what is meant. ... Popper was right about falsifiability but his idea was nothing new. ... Proving it didn't happen in a given spot or planet does not prove that ... upset about the lack of absolutism in real life. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: [OT]: The not-so-democratic Democrats
    ... I expected you to dismiss based on the source. ... documents,either(after evidence of forgery was exposed). ... >>Not a false claim. ... > You've already lost that argument to someone else in this news group. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Woman forced from own home by police
    ... The weight of evidence is piling up against you, ... Kev. ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: Woman forced from own home by police
    ... The weight of evidence is piling up against you, ... Kev. ...
    (uk.legal)
Quantcast