Re: increase in information represented by DNA
- From: AC <mightymartianca@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 12 Dec 2007 23:26:38 GMT
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:20:15 GMT,
John Harshman <jharshman.diespamdie@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
treusdrie@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
John Harshman wrote:So that whole thing about measuring information by measuring fitness was
Since information is the degree to which one variable of a system
depends on or is constrained by another, fitness is a function of
information inasmuch as one set of variables intrinsic to the organism
depends on or is constrained by another set of variables extrinsic to
the organism.
So genotype X has more information than genotype Y if genotype X has
higher fitness in the current environment?
Not necessarily. Information content is a function of the number of
elements in either corresponding set of variables. More complex
organisms require more information.
just wrong?
I'm still trying to figure out how is fundementally circular definition is
supposed to work.
--
Aaron Clausen mightymartianca@xxxxxxxxx
fnor
.
- References:
- Re: increase in information represented by DNA
- From: Robert Carnegie
- Re: increase in information represented by DNA
- From: treusdrie
- Re: increase in information represented by DNA
- From: John Harshman
- Re: increase in information represented by DNA
- From: treusdrie
- Re: increase in information represented by DNA
- From: John Harshman
- Re: increase in information represented by DNA
- From: treusdrie
- Re: increase in information represented by DNA
- From: John Harshman
- Re: increase in information represented by DNA
- From: treusdrie
- Re: increase in information represented by DNA
- From: John Harshman
- Re: increase in information represented by DNA
- Prev by Date: John Hawks talking re Wisconsin paper and the follow-up paper
- Next by Date: Re: The Reasonable Minority
- Previous by thread: Re: increase in information represented by DNA
- Next by thread: Re: increase in information represented by DNA
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|