Re: Origin of female
- From: r norman <r_s_norman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2007 18:48:08 -0500
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 16:26:14 -0600, Ferrous Patella
<FerrousPatella@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Lauren <laurenh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:d8f1eb29-4f63-4644-88c4-
898f222cb9cc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
Not so long ago I read a post in one of the threads in this group
giving an explanation how the original cells of abiogenesis split to
form what is now known as the first female. I can not find it again.
Will someone please help me find it? If the original poster sees this,
please help me to find it. If someone can put me on track to find
something similar, I shall be very grateful.
Tnx,
Lauren
I think females are like atheists. The concept would not exist if it
weren't for males/theists. Life was happily reproducing before genders came
along. Even sexual recombination was possible without sexual dimorphism
(see earthworms). So I see the whole baby-carrying state as being the
default mode (again like atheism) until someone comes up with this bizarre
divisive concept to mess with our heads.
.
- References:
- Origin of female
- From: Lauren
- Re: Origin of female
- From: Ferrous Patella
- Origin of female
- Prev by Date: Re: Re: The Superior Evidence of Genesis
- Next by Date: Re: We have to respect the limits of human knowledge!
- Previous by thread: Re: Origin of female
- Next by thread: Re: Origin of female
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
