Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?
- From: Danwood <noreply@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 19:06:12 -0500
Greg Guarino wrote:
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 13:53:54 -0500, Danwood <noreply@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
wrote:
It is mostsimilar between humans and chimpanzees, a bit less similar betweenAnd why not? If it works why not use it. Engineers very often utilize the same basic design in different constructs and modify the design to fit the application or meet different requirements. This is called variations upon a common theme. Also this is called economy in design.
humans (or chimps) and gorillas, and still less similar between apes
and macaques. Again, this is just the pattern of similarities and
differences we would expect from common descent, but not at all
something we would expect from common design and separate creations.
I don't think you understand the example well enough. Economy of
design would dictate leaving out the gene altogether, not merely
disabling it.
I responded to the above statement about similarities between humans and
chimps/gorillas. Y
>
Leaving non-functioning stuff in a design is the
OPPOSITE of economy. But OK, God is lazy, so he leaves the gene in and>
disables it instead.
The human body contains some 20,000 - 25,000 genes which express for
75 trillion of cells organized into hundreds of kinds of cells and
places them in their proper place in the body. Cells which make up
such intricacies as liver, heart, kidney, eyes and the human brain with 100 billion neutrons and trillions
of connections. So virtually all gene are almost certain to be pleiotropic meaning each gene expresses for a whole host of traits
and characteristics. The same gene for example expresses for eye color
and certain enzymes which are produced by the liver. the same gene
expresses for a nerve which controls the anal muscles just mention a
few: the list goes on and on. Genes also turn other genes off and on.
So, my point is even though some function of one gene might by
disabled it is indispensable in the whole scheme of thing.
>
>
But that's not all. Those disabled (now pseudo-) genes, are they>
identical? No. So God didn't just disable the gene for producing
Vitamin C, he also CHANGED each NON-FUNCTIONING gene such that each
species has a slightly different (but still non-working) version.
See my statement above
Are we done yet? No. Are the pseudogenes for orangs, gorillas, chimps
and humans changed in random ways? Nope. God made some changes common
to all the great apes, then some that only gorillas, chimps and humans
share, then some that only chimps and humans share, then some unique
to humans, exactly as would have happened if a nonessential gene
accumulated mutations as species split off from one another. That's a
lot of unneeded effort, with only one purpose I can think of: to
create the ILLUSION of common descent.
Wait, there's more. God also created other animals who eat a lot of
fruit and thus don't need to manufacture Vitamin C, including guinea
pigs. He decides to disable their GULO gene as well. Doe he use the
same method he used for the primates? No. It's an entirely different
method. >
>
How about an analogy?>
I design cars (not really, as will no doubt become obvious in this
discussion). In fact, I design all the cars for Nissonda Motors. We
are developing a line of hydrogen cars. We'll have several, including
a compact, a family sedan and an SUV.
> Our cars will no longer need catalytic converters, but I have decided
to leave them in. My design calls for a pipe to bypass the converters.>
Out of perversity, or perhaps for job security, I have decided to
redesign the internal workings of the UNUSED catalytic converter
slightly for each car.
I'm really busy now. We've been so successful the directors of theYou've modified you converters etc to meet specific needs rather than
company have decided we need some new models. The compact and the
sedan will each now be available in a coupe as well. We'll also have a
pickup, based on the SUV design. Well, you know me; I just can't
resist tinkering with those converters.
I've decided not to design three new converters, though. For the
compact coupe, I've modified the compact 4-door's unit a bit. I've
tinkered a little with the mid-size's converter for it's coupe and
reshaped a few internal parts from the SUV's part for the pickup.
throw them out and start over. Good move.
>
Our hydrogen cars are selling like gangbusters now. So much so that>
Forvrolet has decided to come out with their own line. They're keeping
the catalytic converters too (why mess with success?), but instead of
the bypass pipe, they're disabling theirs by ripping out most of the
internal parts.
Economy of design indeed.
Do this and a living organism dies. Rip out the gene controlling the
manufacture of vitamin C we become extinct because the isotropically
gene expressed bot just for vitamin C but also for other indispensable organs or functions or who knows some brain neutrons.
DanWood
Greg Guarino
.
- References:
- Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?
- From: James Goetz
- Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?
- From: r norman
- Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?
- From: James Goetz
- Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?
- From: Danwood
- Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?
- From: Danwood
- Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?
- From: Danwood
- Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?
- From: Greg Guarino
- Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?
- Prev by Date: Re: Can ID be Tested?
- Next by Date: Re: Manufacture vs. Artifact?
- Previous by thread: Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?
- Next by thread: Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|