Re: Chez Watt Re: The important question for the Expanding Earth

On Nov 1, 12:17 pm, "J. Taylor" <nchiw...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:17:19 -0000, Max <maxdw...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Oct 31, 11:10 am, "J. Taylor" <nchiw...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:37:38 -0000, Max <maxdw...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In the astronomy through paleontology category.

On Oct 30, 9:32 pm, "J. Taylor" <nchiw...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
<snip bs>
Past orbital dynamics is known from fossil records, as is what shows
expansion, the fact they show different things does not mean I get to
exclude one in favor of the other, and neither do you. You have to
find out why they say different things.

<snip more bs>

And as a clueless wonder, your problem with that is what?

JT

I have seen many clueless types here, but you take the cake. Care to
tell me which fossil records show us orbital dynamics?

Yes, and when done you will be shown for the clueless idiot that you
are.

Care to further
show how they support your theory? I know we have some information on
tides from corals, but that's about it. And even that doesn't provide
any support for your theory.

Was not arguing it did support EE, was acknowledging that it does not.

I'll grant you that. I misread. What fossil evidence supports EE?

And the fact you do not even know what it is, serves to show you are a
loud mouth idiot, whom likes to mouth off.

No, it shows that I couldn't remember the precise method in the
article I read and was feeling to lazy to look it up.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/moonrec.html

Corals are also used.
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CE/CE110.html

Why don't you get a clue, so your stupidity is less often exposed by
your repeated Chez Watt posts.

I'm posting to a newsgroup where people are arguing for a 6,000 year
old earth or and expanding earth. I'm not worried about being seen as
the stupidest one here. :)

How about you look up "rhymites" fossilized tidal patterns which show
LOD, length of year, lunar month.

It's rhythmites, not "rhymites". And corals also used.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Local Authority Byelection Results: Thursday 16th August 2007.
    ... recall they declined to support. ... Where I think the LibDems did get it wrong is in issuing publicity at the ... because they realised that arguing over the details of the system would be perceived ... I'm pretty sure the Conservative calls for open lists were to a large ...
    (uk.politics.electoral)
  • Re: Palins (almost) son in law -- nude
    ... The important thing is he helping to support his son? ... Its hard to tell from all the arguing going on. ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: Expanding earth miracles
    ... expanding earth is false. ... it violate physics, astrodynamics, and even chemisty. ... You remind me of Lord Kelvin who thought that we ... providing the mass to support your contention that the earth expanded ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: The Myth of the Bull Elephant
    ... there is no point in arguing with out of date numbers that have ... been cherrypicked to support your preexisting contentions. ... you cherry pick everything to your POV. ... Statistics can often be interpreted for any purpose. ...
    (misc.news.internet.discuss)