Re: Science Disproves Evolution
- From: Kermit <unrestrained_hand@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:01:02 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 20, 2:50 pm, Pahu <pah...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Lead and Helium Diffusion
Lead diffuses (or leaks) from zircon crystals at known rates that
increase with temperature. Because these crystals are found at
different depths in the Earth, those at greater depths and
temperatures should have less lead. If the Earth's crust is just a
fraction of the age claimed by evolutionists, measurable differences
in the lead content of zircons should exist in the top 4,000 meters.
Instead, no measurable difference is found (a). Similar conclusions
are reached based on the helium content in these same zircon crystals
(b). Because helium escapes so rapidly and so much helium is still in
zircons, they (and the Earth's crust) must be less than 10,000 years
old (c).
a. "Taken together, these results strongly suggest that there has been
little or no differential Pb loss which can be attributed to the
higher temperatures existing at greater depths." Robert V. Gentry et
al., "Differential Lead Retention in Zircons: Implications for Nuclear
Waste Containment," Science, 16 April 1982, p. 296.
Robert V. Gentry, "Letters," Physics Today, October 1982, pp. 13-14.
b. Robert V. Gentry, "Letters," Physics Today, April 1983, p. 13.
c. "In fact, considering the Precambrian age of the granite cores, our
results show an almost phenomenal amount of He has been retained at
higher temperatures, and the reason for this certainly needs further
investigation ..." Robert V. Gentry et al., "Differential Helium
Retention in Zircons," Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 9, No. 10,
October 1982, p. 1130.
Robert V. Gentry, personal communication, 24 February 1984.
D. Russell Humphreys et al., "Helium Diffusion Rates Support
Accelerated Nuclear Decay," Proceedings of the Fifth International
Conference on Creationism (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Creation Science
Fellowship, Inc., 2003), pp. 175-195.
Most Scientific Dating Techniques Indicate That the Earth, Solar
System, and Universe Are Young.
For the last 150 years, the age of the Earth, as assumed by
evolutionists, has been doubling at roughly a rate of once every 15
years. In fact, since 1900 this age has multiplied by a factor of
100!
Evolution requires an old Earth, an old solar system, and an old
universe. Nearly all informed evolutionists will admit that without
billions of years their theory is dead. Yet, hiding the "origins
question" behind a vast veil of time makes the unsolvable problems of
evolution difficult for scientists to see and laymen to imagine. Our
media and textbooks have implied for over a century that these almost
unimaginable ages are correct. Rarely do people examine the shaky
assumptions and growing body of contrary evidence. Therefore, most
people today almost instinctively believe that the Earth and universe
are billions of years old. Sometimes, these people are disturbed, at
least initially, when they see the evidence.
Actually, most dating techniques indicate that the Earth and solar
system are young--possibly less than 10,000 years old.
If you are collecting debunked Creationist lies, wouldn't it be
simpler to just read the talk.origins' website?
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/list.html#CD
Kermit
.
- References:
- Science Disproves Evolution
- From: Pahu
- Science Disproves Evolution
- Prev by Date: Re: Judgement Day on NOVA
- Next by Date: Re: Kenneth Miller's Interview with NOVA
- Previous by thread: Re: Science Disproves Evolution
- Next by thread: Science Disproves Evolution
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
