Re: Would Sir David Attenborough be considered a "scientist"?
- From: amorgan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Alan Morgan)
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 10:24:56 -0800 (PST)
In article <1i7o2w2.6uqbzzj02p1pN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
J. J. Lodder <jjlxa31@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The question is, has Attenborough fulfilled the requirements of OUR
time? Is he a scientist, or is that an abuse of the term?
It seems to me that anyone who can put FRS behind his name qualifies.
He has been peer-selected,
Alas, Margaret Thatcher is a FRS.
I found a reference to Sir David referring to his science career as
being "from the other side of the fence", which I presume means that
he doesn't consider himself a scientist. Whatever. He has probably
done more to advance the cause of science than most real scientists
have and he is a top-notch science educator and that should be enough.
Alan
--
Defendit numerus
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Would Sir David Attenborough be considered a "scientist"?
- From: Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Would Sir David Attenborough be considered a "scientist"?
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Google whitelist
- Next by Date: Re: Lonely Girl Seeks Man!
- Previous by thread: Re: Would Sir David Attenborough be considered a "scientist"?
- Next by thread: Re: Would Sir David Attenborough be considered a "scientist"?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|