Re: freedom is still real

nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx <nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 14 nov, 19:21, "nando_rontel...@xxxxxxxxx"
<nando_rontel...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sure I know how to evidence free behaviour, I do this all the time,
trace back the likelyhood of the appearance of a thing to the
decisions at which it was determined to be.


And besides me, historians are also good at this, not just for people
but also for variation in the weather, as it affects a battle or a
diplomatic situation for instance.

But David here, he wants to help science by destroying knowledge about
freedom. Destroy knowledge about intelligent design, and creation.

Knowledge being justified true belief, what you spout isn't knowledge,
since it's not based on any actual evidence.

This is a scientist!

As opposed to you, the ignorant anti-science clown?

I suggest, you being a scientist, you should increase our knowledge of
the universe, instead of destroying it. Just a suggestion. You might
want to take it up some time. You might want to stop destroying and
oppressing an entire fundamental class of knowledge which people use
on a practical basis every single day of their lives.

And besides, the fact is that it is causation that is "unevidenced" in
science. So says Dubois.

"What a maroon!" So says Bugs.

http://www.mindspring.com/~cerebroscopic/Dubois.html
"In looking in equations of physics, there is no evidence that
causation plays a central role or even exists ! What physics learn to
us is that natural evolution of systems obeys invariance, like the
conservation of energy, for example. All physics can be explained and
understood without any causation but with the conservation of some
properties, in reference to the very famous Noether Theorem"

Well, I guess this means we have to reserve judgement on causation.
Which means, in terms of the standard accepted practice for reserving
judgement, to oppress knowledge about causation in academics.

Given your demonstrated immense incompetence in physics, you have no
grounds to make any claims about it, fuckwit. You really don't
have the faintest idea what your repeating, like a parrot. The parrot
doesn't understand physics, nor do you. You're too vain to ever
pick up a book and learn some, clearly, since you're no doubt afraid
it would make you think.

--D.

.

Loading