Re: Hypothesis for Discussion


"Rupert Morrish" <rupert@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:472ed63b$0$7522$8d2e0cab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
backspace wrote:
[snip]
Lets take "sexual selection" What could this possibly mean? There is
no such of course as a point of logic if you differ please, please
just don't tell me Mr. Science says so!

"sexual selection" is why you aren't getting any.

Yes, it shows.

Which is odd, given he reckons to be good with tongues.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Hypothesis for Discussion
    ... backspace wrote: ... > Lets take "sexual selection" What could this possibly mean? ... just don't tell me Mr. Science says so! ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
    ... Depends on what the criteria for candidates are. ... How about we just teach science in science class? ... As long as the policy is entirely secular (and biology ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Mischaracterization of ID?
    ... >in court, which was aso made quite clear. ... They can easily decide that science, ... School boards decide on curricula based on (to be ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
    ... > of science and philosophy. ... *as implemented in laws and policies* have purpose and effect. ... Why do you think that SETI isn't science? ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Talk on the Faith: Advice?
    ... There are really only two places where I differ with you. ... But Abdu'l Baha is also the one who said ... "When a religion is opposed to science it becomes mere superstition: ... that which is contrary to knowledge is ignorance. ...
    (soc.religion.bahai)