Re: Re: James Watson, Evolutionist & Racist Dirtbag

On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 20:20:01 -0700, Ray Martinez
<pyramidial@xxxxxxxxx> enriched this group when s/he wrote:

On Oct 22, 12:39 am, brog...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Oct 20, 1:28 am, Ray Martinez <pyramid...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:





http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071019/ap_on_sc/britain_controversial_sc...

"The trouble began after the Sunday Times Magazine of London quoted
Watson as saying that he's 'inherently gloomy about the prospect of
Africa' because 'all our social policies are based on the fact that
their intelligence is the same as ours - whereas all the testing says
not really.'"

Confirming what we already knew: evolution is racist. This is what
happens when God is rejected as Creator and Africa is considered the
place where monkeys first morphed into human beings. Darwin, as Ed
Larson pointed out, was comparing Fuegians to apes in the London zoo
as early as the late 1830s (2004:66,67).

Watson shows his true colors and what evolutionists have been up to in
their "testing."

Now watch ordinary Darwinists lie brazenlly about these ugly facts, an
activity conducive with racism, instead of coming clean and
apologizing without excuse or qualification.

Ray

Well, I can certainly condemn Watson's completely outrageous statement
without excuse or qualification,

Good, finally a TOite does.

as have a large number of non-
creationists.

Have they villified him as much as Hovind?

Hovind is/was a lying criminal shitbag, almost as dishonest as you.

No, because they are racist hypocrites feigning "outrage."

I've read what he stated. I disagree 100% with the way he said it, but
not with the facts behind what he said.

It is not clear why I should apologize on his behalf or
on behalf of scientists generally. He speaks only for himself,
certainly not for "evolutionists" in general. He has been roundly and
throughly condemned by many other biological scientists.


Showtime! Behind the scenes they are just as racist.

Coming from the racist known as Dishonest Ray, we can ignore that
comment.

You would have to
be awfully naive to believe otherwise. Like I said, the only surprise
in all of this, including the reactions of Darwinists and their phony
rage, is that Watson got caught.

He was "caught", if that is the right word, being very careless with
how he put things.

In Los Angeles we know that the only surprise in the Rodney King
beating case was that the police got caught. They are still criminals
with badges who can beat a person laying face down on the ground with
five cops standing around refusing to handcuff him. It happens all of
the time - still. Cops think they are above the law and their racism
is institutional.

What has that got to do with it?

Evolution and its orgins in Darwin's racist mind is
the same.

Darwin was less racist than most people of his time - that allowed him
to see that man was also a product of evolution.

ALL of the early evolutionists were openly racist and had
signed on to eugenics agendas.

Prove that claim Dishonest Ray, or accept you are a liar once more.

These facts have been suppressed by
your pro-evolution friends in the news media. Evolution IS racist,
educated and objective persons know that this is a fact.

Liar!

We also know that evolutionists were caging Africans in zoos next apes
as "proof of human evolution" in the early 20th century.

Oh they did it in the 1960s as well Dishonest Ray, except that time it
was white people.

And we were
TOLD that evolution was based on evidence.

Yes, that is a fact you cannot get round.

The indignity confirms what
Darwin originally based human evolution on: "similarity to living
apes." Again, his private notebooks compare Fuegians and apes.

But NOT in the way you always claim Dishonest Ray.

His
autobiography admits that he assumed for human evolution immediately
after accepting species mutability in 1839!

That would make sense. After all, there is nothing to set us aside
from our animal relatives.

I said 1839! He only had been back in England since October 1836! He
didn't publish any transmutationist-based theory until 1858. "Descent
of Man" was not published until the early 1870s.

Yes, he did take a long time to get things into print.

Since Darwin was openly racist like most Englishmen, it only took the
racism that was already there to make the connection. The point is
that human evolution was born in racism, not evidence.

Liar!

It was an
assumption made after God was rejected as Creator. That is the origin
of human evolution.

Since there is no evidence for god, and a mountain of evidence for
evolution....

James Watson is a Darwinist.

He even published Darwin's works as an editor.

Good for him.

You seem not to listen when anyone tells you this, but evolutionary
biologists do not, repeat do not, believe that because Homo sapiens
originated in Africa that the current, modern residents of Africa are
evolutionarily more closely related to the last common ancestor of
humans and chimps than are the current modern residents of Europe or
Asia or America.

Yeah right.

You have a problem with that fact Dishonest Ray?

"Even though evolutionists admit that apes first started changing into
men in Africa, just forget the obvious racism element because we said
so."

What racism?

Also, "just forget all the other facts, we are doing science, we
deserve an exemption."

I supppose you would believe a skin head if he said that he was not a
racist?

Sure I would, I know a lot of them. The length of their hair has
noting to do with their view on race.

SNIP....

Ray

--
Bob.

.