Re: James Watson, Evolutionist & Racist Dirtbag

On Oct 24, 10:20 am, Ray Martinez <pyramid...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Oct 22, 12:39 am, brog...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:





On Oct 20, 1:28 am, Ray Martinez <pyramid...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071019/ap_on_sc/britain_controversial_sc...

"The trouble began after the Sunday Times Magazine of London quoted
Watson as saying that he's 'inherently gloomy about the prospect of
Africa' because 'all our social policies are based on the fact that
their intelligence is the same as ours - whereas all the testing says
not really.'"

Confirming what we already knew: evolution is racist. This is what
happens when God is rejected as Creator and Africa is considered the
place where monkeys first morphed into human beings. Darwin, as Ed
Larson pointed out, was comparing Fuegians to apes in the London zoo
as early as the late 1830s (2004:66,67).

Watson shows his true colors and what evolutionists have been up to in
their "testing."

Now watch ordinary Darwinists lie brazenlly about these ugly facts, an
activity conducive with racism, instead of coming clean and
apologizing without excuse or qualification.

Ray

Well, I can certainly condemn Watson's completely outrageous statement
without excuse or qualification,

Good, finally a TOite does.

as have a large number of non-
creationists.

Have they villified him as much as Hovind?

In fact, in terms of media coverage, I think Watson has gotten a lot
more negative press than Hovind ever did.


No, because they are racist hypocrites feigning "outrage."

It is not clear why I should apologize on his behalf or
on behalf of scientists generally. He speaks only for himself,
certainly not for "evolutionists" in general. He has been roundly and
throughly condemned by many other biological scientists.

Showtime! Behind the scenes they are just as racist. You would have to
be awfully naive to believe otherwise. Like I said, the only surprise
in all of this, including the reactions of Darwinists and their phony
rage, is that Watson got caught.

In Los Angeles we know that the only surprise in the Rodney King
beating case was that the police got caught. They are still criminals
with badges who can beat a person laying face down on the ground with
five cops standing around refusing to handcuff him. It happens all of
the time - still. Cops think they are above the law and their racism
is institutional. Evolution and its orgins in Darwin's racist mind is
the same. ALL of the early evolutionists were openly racist and had
signed on to eugenics agendas. These facts have been suppressed by
your pro-evolution friends in the news media. Evolution IS racist,
educated and objective persons know that this is a fact.

Most of the early evolutionsists were racist. Most of the early
creationists were racist, too. Racist evolutionists twisted the theory
of evolution to support their pre-existing racism. Racist creationists
twisted the Bible to support their pre-existing racism. Racism is a
terrible problem, with deep, deep roots. But those deep roots have
nothing to do with the theory of evolution or the Bible.




We also know that evolutionists were caging Africans in zoos next apes
as "proof of human evolution" in the early 20th century. And we were
TOLD that evolution was based on evidence. The indignity confirms what
Darwin originally based human evolution on: "similarity to living
apes." Again, his private notebooks compare Fuegians and apes. His
autobiography admits that he assumed for human evolution immediately
after accepting species mutability in 1839!

I said 1839! He only had been back in England since October 1836! He
didn't publish any transmutationist-based theory until 1858. "Descent
of Man" was not published until the early 1870s.

Since Darwin was openly racist like most Englishmen, it only took the
racism that was already there to make the connection. The point is
that human evolution was born in racism, not evidence. It was an
assumption made after God was rejected as Creator. That is the origin
of human evolution.

James Watson is a Darwinist.

He even published Darwin's works as an editor.

You seem not to listen when anyone tells you this, but evolutionary
biologists do not, repeat do not, believe that because Homo sapiens
originated in Africa that the current, modern residents of Africa are
evolutionarily more closely related to the last common ancestor of
humans and chimps than are the current modern residents of Europe or
Asia or America.


Yeah right.

"Yeah right" is hardly an argument. It mystifies me that you think an
African origin for homo sapiens would imply that modern Africans are
more closely related to the LCA with chimps than modern Australians or
Asians or Europeans. Plasmodium falciparum, the worst of the malaria
parasites, seems to have originated in Africa, too. Nobody who studies
parasite evolution would claim that the P. falciparum strains in
Africa are "less advanced" than the P. falciparum strains from Asia or
South America. You certainly seem inclined to a racist interpretation
of the "Out of Africa" theory of human origins, but the people who
actually accept the theory do not see it as racist (including plenty
of African and African American anthropologists).


"Even though evolutionists admit that apes first started changing into
men in Africa, just forget the obvious racism element because we said
so."

Also, "just forget all the other facts, we are doing science, we
deserve an exemption."

I supppose you would believe a skin head if he said that he was not a
racist?



SNIP....

Ray- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: James Watson, Evolutionist & Racist Dirtbag
    ... happens when God is rejected as Creator and Africa is considered the ... Cops think they are above the law and their racism ... Evolution and its orgins in Darwin's racist mind is ... Darwin originally based human evolution on: ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Re: James Watson, Evolutionist & Racist Dirtbag
    ... happens when God is rejected as Creator and Africa is considered the ... to see that man was also a product of evolution. ... Prove that claim Dishonest Ray, or accept you are a liar once more. ... Darwin originally based human evolution on: ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: James Watson, Evolutionist & Racist Dirtbag (find "the real point")
    ... humans first developing in Africa to racism. ... concluding for human evolution based on similarity to living apes. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Re: James Watson, Evolutionist & Racist Dirtbag (find "the real point")
    ... humans first developing in Africa to racism. ... anyone who understands evolution deny that modern humans started in ... those first modern humans. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Fute lumea, fute...
    ... Eswaran is an unlikely emissary of insights into human evolution. ... He dubbed his hypothesis "the diffusion wave out of Africa." ... occasionally interbreeding with Homo erectus and perhaps other ... As described in a report slated to appear in Genetics, ...
    (soc.culture.romanian)