Re: Avian respiratory systems
- From: Friar Broccoli <EliasRK@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 04:24:58 -0700
On Oct 18, 9:27 pm, chris thompson <chris.linthomp...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Oct 18, 6:24 pm, r norman <r_s_norman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 11:29:01 -0700, chris thompson
<chris.linthomp...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I actually thought it was a more efficient system.
I don't understand -- more than what? Bird respiration is, indeed
more efficient. It is just that the "cross-current" exchange they use
is not quite as perfect as a full "counter-current" system. But it
is still very efficient and the two other adaptations really make it
It seemed to me that a transverse current system- where the
parabronchi are at right angles to the capillaries- would result in a
transfer of a higher percentage of oxygen than a counter current
system, where the flow of air is fully opposite to the flow of blood.
From my intuition:
In a counter-current system at the incoming end (from the air's
point of view) the blood has a high concentration of oxygen,
but the incoming air has even more. At the outgoing end the
concentration of oxygen in the air is low, but that of the blood
is even lower, so diffusion takes place over the entire length of
the system with roughly equal efficiency. Most heat exchangers
work this way too.
In a cross-current system, efficiency is lower at the outgoing
end, to a degree that is not fully compensated for by the increased
efficiency on the incoming side due to the reduced average contact
time.
Chris
far more efficient than the mammalian one. But in evolution, "good
enough" is enough, you don't need "best".
A bio professor posted a response to PZ Meyers discussion of avian
respiration, relating a student being distressed that humans didn't
have more efficient systems than birds, since, in the student's words,
"mammals evolved from birds". Ouch.
Thanks. A fine explanation, as usual.
I taught this stuff for decades. I do have a bit of practice
explaining it!
It's quite a help.
Chris
.
- References:
- Avian respiratory systems
- From: chris thompson
- Re: Avian respiratory systems
- From: r norman
- Re: Avian respiratory systems
- From: chris thompson
- Re: Avian respiratory systems
- From: r norman
- Re: Avian respiratory systems
- From: chris thompson
- Avian respiratory systems
- Prev by Date: Re: There can be no Evolution by natural selection !~~ MITE
- Next by Date: Re: There can be no Evolution by natural selection ! Harry Art
- Previous by thread: Re: Avian respiratory systems
- Next by thread: Re: Avian respiratory systems
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|