Re: Science Disproves Evolution
- From: Robert Weldon <rweldon@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:14:50 -0700
On Oct 10, 11:45 am, Pahu <pah...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Geologic Column
Practically nowhere on Earth can one find the so-called "geologic
column" (a). Most "geologic periods" are missing at most continental
locations. Only 15-20% of Earth's land surface has even one-third of
these periods in the correct order (b). Even within the Grand Canyon,
150 million years of this imaginary column are missing. Using the
assumed geologic column to date fossils and rocks is fallacious.
a. "We are only kidding ourselves if we think that we have anything
like a complete succession for any part of the stratigraphical column
in any one place." Ager, Stratigraphical Record, p. 48.
b. John Woodmorappe, "The Essential Nonexistence of the Evolutionary-
Uniformitarian Geologic Column: A Quantitative Assessment," Creation
Research Society Quarterly, Vol. 18, June 1981, pp. 46-71.
Techniques That Argue for an Old Earth Are Either Illogical or Are
Based on Unreasonable Assumptions.
To estimate a date prior to the beginning of written records, one must
assume that the dating clock has operated at a known rate, that the
clock's initial setting is known, and that the clock has not been
disturbed. These three assumptions are almost always unstated,
overlooked, or invalid.
http://www.creationscience.com/
We already know you are an idiot, no need to keep proving it. FOAD.
.
- References:
- Science Disproves Evolution
- From: Pahu
- Science Disproves Evolution
- Prev by Date: Re: There can be no Evolution by natural selection ! Harry
- Next by Date: Re: There can be no Evolution by natural selection photosenses ~Art
- Previous by thread: Re: Science Disproves Evolution
- Next by thread: Science Disproves Evolution
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|