S.A.T.



On Sep 29, 12:44 pm, "nando_rontel...@xxxxxxxxx"
<nando_rontel...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well actually it is proven that creationist knowledge about freedom is
correct, by strong anticipation theory the future of alternatives has
been proven to exist.


Strong Anticipation Theory will fully replace Intelligent Design in the
Creationist/SAT world view. This powerful analytic tool, developed to probe
the future of alternatives, will establish the freedom of Creationist/SAT
knowledge. With free knowledge the deluded Theory of Evolution will wither
and die.

The alternatives arising at the moment of "macroevolution" have been
determined to be singular Creation events predicted by Strong Anticipation
Theory. The results are, of course, new organisms never seen before and the
features of those organisms are completely predictable under Strong
Anticipation Theory. No more does science have to deal with improbabilities
of random "selection" and unguided "mutations", the future will be
absolutely predicted by God. SAT is the science of God!

Cj

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: S.A.T.
    ... Strong Anticipation Theory will fully replace Intelligent Design in the ... will establish the freedom of Creationist/SAT ... SAT is the science of God! ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: what I want
    ... MockedUnicorn wrote: ... So basically you are saying that you don't think it's true that there ... I don't think Google has a lot to find on Strong Anticipation Theory as yet. ... No matter how much you wish, ID is NOT a science by any means. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: what I want
    ... and this is why you are not defending it. ... I don't think Google has a lot to find on Strong Anticipation Theory as yet. ... the apparent problems with the Intelligent Design conjecture. ... No matter how much you wish, ID is NOT a science by any means. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: what I want
    ... and this is why you are not defending it. ... I don't think Google has a lot to find on Strong Anticipation Theory as yet. ... No matter how much you wish, ID is NOT a science by any means. ... ID doesn't really have much to say at all, other than a rather empty claim ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: what I want
    ... On Oct 2, 1:25 am, Richard Clayton ... I don't think Google has a lot to find on Strong Anticipation Theory as yet. ... Science never proves anything, ever. ... Furthermore it proofs that some theories work better than others. ...
    (talk.origins)