Re: another thought experiment

On 30 Set, 22:33, "Cj" <cw...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Let us consider another thought experiment. ID finally gets its act
together and demonstrates mathematically that God was actually a committee.
Scientists decide to avoid the issue entirely since it is fundamentally a
religious concern. How do the creationists react to this triumph of
Intelligent Design?
Cj

Let's consider this:
ID finally proves mathematically that the number of angels that can
dance on the tip of a pin at the same time is 42.
Scientists decide to avoid the issue entirely since it is
fundamentally nonsense.
How do usernet posters react to this?


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: another thought experiment
    ... together and demonstrates mathematically that God was actually a committee. ... Scientists decide to avoid the issue entirely since it is ... How do usernet posters react to this? ...
    (talk.origins)
  • another thought experiment
    ... together and demonstrates mathematically that God was actually a committee. ... Scientists decide to avoid the issue entirely since it is fundamentally a ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: another thought experiment
    ... Scientists decide to avoid the issue entirely since it is ... "God as a committee" makes better sense to me. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: programming bomb-testing experiment on a regular computer
    ... point of interference is that at that point there are no alternative ... What is a wave that is only at a single ... Why again do we need to avoid talking about decisions, ... practice of Darwinist scientists by talking in terms of decisions in ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Turning on/off objects inside a display list?
    ... and there some willingness to avoid a large rewrite:). ... The geometry in the display list is static and therefore it has made sense to have a readily made list. ... It doesn't happen as often as it should, because scientists ...
    (comp.graphics.api.opengl)