Re: What I want
- From: "Greg G." <ggwizz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:52:51 -0700
On Sep 26, 5:49 pm, "nando_rontel...@xxxxxxxxx"
<nando_rontel...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
- comparisons and succes have not actually been observed in nature,
and finding actual freedom in nature will force natural selection
theory to be found basically false for it's use of that language, and
that construction.
It has been shown that certain heritable traits are beneficial to
survival in certain environments which allows more offspring to
survive and pass on those traits even more. That's natural selection
in a nutshell. What is disputable about that?
- historians do have an interest in sociology, and how intellectual
climate of opinion develops on account of false ideas like natural
selection
Many people consider natural selection to be false because they don't
understand how simple it really is. Those historians might have an
interest in the development of opinions of things falsely though to be
untrue.
- freedom of people in some countries is oppressed, it is still there
basically. The rights are acknowledged by the constitution, not given
by it.
True but they still lack the freedom to fly like a bird.
- the heart is a good center for making decisions, a center that is
well placed further away from the enormous computationpower of the
brain, a place which rhythmically governs the entire body. The heart
is electrochemical just as well as the brain is, and in direct
connection with the brain, so there is no reason to say that the brain
is the center.
People have lived with artificial hearts.Their decision making is no
different than before. People live with transplanted hearts. Their
decision making doesn't change anymore than those with a transplanted
corneas.
- fastpaced action is just evidence that decisions are made in the
heart, without getting caught up in unneccesary thinking with words or
images in the brain.
Can artificial mechanical hearts make decisions for people?
- you've read that some electric thingy shows up in the brain a third
of a second later then the action, which means that the brain is not
the location of the first decision but a later consequence of a
decision, which function it is to rationalize the first decision for
communication and memory purposes.
I recall that the investigators could see the region of the brain that
corresponds to decision making abilities and the region involved with
conscious awareness and could time when the neurons fired.
- the role of hormones and such is to cause an interference pattern at
a basic level in the rhythmic decisionmakingprocess. the basic
molecular level, and the location of the hormones is more evidence
that the heart is a decisioncenter rather then the brain.
The heart doesn't have the receptors that correspond to the hormones
associated with emotions, does it?
regards,
Mohammad Nur Syamsu
--
Greg G.
Your vision will become clear only when you look into your heart. Who
looks outside, dreams. Who looks inside, awakens.
--Carl Gustav Jung
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What I want
- From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: What I want
- From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: What I want
- References:
- What I want
- From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: What I want
- From: Greg G.
- Re: What I want
- From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
- What I want
- Prev by Date: Same old silliness
- Next by Date: Re: Council of Europe to vote on creationism
- Previous by thread: Re: What I want
- Next by thread: Re: What I want
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
