Re: The number of angles that can fit on the head of a pin
- From: Ymir <ymir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:42:17 GMT
In article <1190619993.375188.200020@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Raving <raving.loonie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Someone recently suggested that the "angels on the head of a pin"
debate involved some substantive issues. ... That it was not just an
exercise in frivolous excess.
Yes. It was essentially a mathematical discussion concerning the nature
of infinity and of infinitesimals which occurred long before either
Newton or Leibniz. Because of the theological metaphors employed, the
serious nature of the discussion tends to be lost on most postmediaeval
audiences.
Andre
--
use rot thirteen to email
ntvfnnx@xxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Converstation with Jeckyl and someone about implausibility of physicalism (2nd attempt as message seems deleted on Google)
- From: someone3
- Re: Converstation with Jeckyl and someone about implausibility of physicalism (2nd attempt as message seems deleted on Google)
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Converstation with Jeckyl and someone about implausibility of physicalism (2nd attempt as message seems deleted on Google)
- From: someone3
- Re: Converstation with Jeckyl and someone about implausibility of physicalism (2nd attempt as message seems deleted on Google)
- From: Mujin
- Re: Converstation with Jeckyl and someone about implausibility of physicalism (2nd attempt as message seems deleted on Google)
- From: someone3
- Re: Converstation with Jeckyl and someone about implausibility of physicalism (2nd attempt as message seems deleted on Google)
- From: Mujin
- Re: Converstation with Jeckyl and someone about implausibility of physicalism (2nd attempt as message seems deleted on Google)
- From: someone3
- Re: Converstation with Jeckyl and someone about implausibility of physicalism (2nd attempt as message seems deleted on Google)
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Converstation with Jeckyl and someone about implausibility of physicalism (2nd attempt as message seems deleted on Google)
- From: someone3
- Re: Converstation with Jeckyl and someone about implausibility of physicalism (2nd attempt as message seems deleted on Google)
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Converstation with Jeckyl and someone about implausibility of physicalism (2nd attempt as message seems deleted on Google)
- From: someone3
- Re: Converstation with Jeckyl and someone about implausibility of physicalism (2nd attempt as message seems deleted on Google)
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Converstation with Jeckyl and someone about implausibility of physicalism (2nd attempt as message seems deleted on Google)
- From: someone3
- Re: Converstation with Jeckyl and someone about implausibility of physicalism (2nd attempt as message seems deleted on Google)
- From: DuhIdiot
- The number of angles that can fit on the head of a pin
- From: Raving
- Re: The number of angles that can fit on the head of a pin
- From: Rusty Sites
- Re: The number of angles that can fit on the head of a pin
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: The number of angles that can fit on the head of a pin
- From: Raving
- Re: Converstation with Jeckyl and someone about implausibility of physicalism (2nd attempt as message seems deleted on Google)
- Prev by Date: Re: Foxnews says NS is random - Coyne begs to differ.
- Next by Date: Re: Converstation with Jeckyl and someone about implausibility of physicalism (2nd attempt as message seems deleted on Google)
- Previous by thread: Re: The number of angles that can fit on the head of a pin
- Next by thread: Re: The number of angles that can fit on the head of a pin
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|