Re: Dark matter
- From: spintronic <spintronic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 11:18:16 -0700
On 23 Sep, 02:51, Bob Casanova <nos...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 11:48:11 -0700, the following appeared
<snip>
So, if that is true, we would expect *not* to find a lot of dark matter
'between galaxies', wouldn't we?
Hmmm!
Let me think! DM aggregates galaxies! Fair enough!
Are you saying every "clump" of DM has aggregated a galaxy?
Prob not! So where are the isolated DM "Clumps" in deep space?
"Prob(ably) not" is not evidence, or even an educated guess.
So why would you expect "isolated DM 'Clumps' in deep
space", other than you think they should be there for some
unknown reason?
I know they aren't there!
Why do you insist there are isolated clumps of "normal matter"?
"For some unknown reason"?
You can't have this both ways!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dark matter
- From: Bob Casanova
- Re: Re: Dark matter
- From: Ye Old One
- Re: Dark matter
- References:
- Re: Dark matter
- From: spintronic
- Re: Re: Dark matter
- From: Ye Old One
- Re: Dark matter
- From: spintronic
- Re: Re: Dark matter
- From: Ye Old One
- Re: Dark matter
- From: spintronic
- Re: Dark matter
- From: Max
- Re: Dark matter
- From: spintronic
- Re: Dark matter
- From: Bill Hudson
- Re: Dark matter
- From: spintronic
- Re: Dark matter
- From: Bob Casanova
- Re: Dark matter
- Prev by Date: Re: Since Talk.Origin Denizens are Smarter than Scientists
- Next by Date: Re: Origins have to be told, not observed?
- Previous by thread: Re: Dark matter
- Next by thread: Re: Re: Dark matter
- Index(es):