Re: Life's complexity: self-organization, evolution or both?
- From: j.wilkins1@xxxxxxxxx (John Wilkins)
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 13:33:48 +1000
Perplexed in Peoria <jimmenegay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"John Harshman" <jharshman.diespamdie@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote..
Bill Morse wrote:
Now obviously the change is due to "the ability of different organisms to
outcompete others in particular environments." But in some of these
communities, the interactions between different organisms, the individuals
helping "create each others' environments", becomes a tight enough loop
that the whole community does behave in some sense as a superorganism.
I can't think of any such communities. There are tight interactions, but
they tend to be between species pairs at the most. And the cases in
which species pairs are always found together, never separately, are
surprisingly few. Even if species A depends absolutely on species B in
some locality, it may depend on species C in some other locality.
I'm not sure that the crucial interactions involved here are 'loops'. In
the cases that Bill mentions in which there seems to be a sharp and
complete change in the member species in the community, I suspect that
it is due to a change in the single primary-producer species. There may
well be loops at the higher trophic levels, but I suspect that most
communities are supported by a single Ayn Rand style rugged individualist
species which is beholden to no other species but is directly or indirectly
grazed and parasitized by everyone else. Change the identity of that
key primary producer, and the identities of every other player perforce
must change too.
This would be the Ecological Refutation of Ayn Rand? Be a rugged
individualist and everyone else will parasitise or predate on you.
--
John S. Wilkins, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Philosophy
University of Queensland - Blog: scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts
"He used... sarcasm. He knew all the tricks, dramatic irony, metaphor,
bathos, puns, parody, litotes and... satire. He was vicious."
.
- References:
- Life's complexity: self-organization, evolution or both?
- From: dkomo
- Re: Life's complexity: self-organization, evolution or both?
- From: John Harshman
- Re: Life's complexity: self-organization, evolution or both?
- From: r norman
- Re: Life's complexity: self-organization, evolution or both?
- From: Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Life's complexity: self-organization, evolution or both?
- From: Raving
- Re: Life's complexity: self-organization, evolution or both?
- From: Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Life's complexity: self-organization, evolution or both?
- From: Bill Morse
- Re: Life's complexity: self-organization, evolution or both?
- From: r norman
- Re: Life's complexity: self-organization, evolution or both?
- From: Bill Morse
- Re: Life's complexity: self-organization, evolution or both?
- From: John Harshman
- Re: Life's complexity: self-organization, evolution or both?
- From: r norman
- Re: Life's complexity: self-organization, evolution or both?
- From: Bill Morse
- Re: Life's complexity: self-organization, evolution or both?
- From: John Harshman
- Re: Life's complexity: self-organization, evolution or both?
- From: Perplexed in Peoria
- Life's complexity: self-organization, evolution or both?
- Prev by Date: Re: Implausibility continued (in C)
- Next by Date: Re: Prof Waagen says evolution is not by chance as Darwin supposed
- Previous by thread: Re: Life's complexity: self-organization, evolution or both?
- Next by thread: Re: Life's complexity: self-organization, evolution or both?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|