Re: Surprise : Earth is flat !

Pertti Koivisto wrote:
When we think that how professors, teachers,researchers, pastors etc.
could be chosen to their offices and jobs. Absolute prerequisite is
that he/she doesn't base his job or work on nonsense,untruth or humbug
or lie. In offices of science truth is only permitted way of
thinking.

Wrong. Speculation is permitted, which is then tested against reality, using the scientific method.

That means that no evolutionists cann't be chosen to any scientific
office.

This has a typographical error and a double negative.

Only creationists can be chosen.

Many creationists wouldn't even be able to explain the scientific method or its importance if their lives depended on it.

That is not because Darwin
believing persons are persucted etc. but beacuse they are living in
the world of delusions that does exist only in their heads.

Someone is clearly off his medication. Not only is this post more delusional than usual, his spell checker is no longer working.


Creationists base their thinking in scientific verifiation of what
is reality and analyzation of observations.

That is not the case on this planet.

Creationists sees at once
by observation that evolution theory is not valid. (See ne page
below) . So only creationism must be tauht in schools.

Some creationists imagine evolution theory is not valid because it conflicts with their interpretation of religious texts, which the refuse to analyze or verify. In the United States, the government may not favor any particular religious viewpoint, including in public schools.

And now to the earth. On web page below is told how God created the
earth.

Oddly, the page does not give "verifiation of what is reality and analyzation of observations" to support the religiously based assertions.

The geometry of surface of the earth is mathematically locally
flat but globally round.

No, the Earth does not appear flat from anywhere!

So man standing on earth sees
earth geometry flat beacuse it is curving so "slowly" , steepness of
the curve of the earth is very slow. That means that the aerth is
"locally" flat in terms of geometry. When we thin the birth of the
earth in the ligt of the web page below, the earth has been in the
beginning first gas then "liquid"
and then solid.

Oddly, molten rock can not be described as water by sane people.

Earths crust is very thin 10-100km. And below it is
more amorfic or liquid phase.
Being hotliquid in the beginning means that when crust has first
solidified there has been ocean throuht otu the globe.

The solid crust formed long before there was any liquid water on the surface. Water does not seem to have ever covered the entire Earth.




Earth has bee
flat. However beacause of the temperature of the earth has been so
high. Mountains etc have soon emerged.

No, the surface of the Earth was never flat, and probably never very smooth.
Klaus


http://users.utu.fi/pertkoiv/


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: What would they be teaching now?
    ... You have only to look at Answers in Genesis' website to see how science would be taught--eventually: ... The moon moves about an inch and a half further away from the earth every year due to this tidal interaction. ... all students would be learning that ID is the consensus theory among scientists. ... Some young-earth creationists are persuaded by Bible-based arguments that there are gaps in the genealogies of Genesis 5 and 11. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: What would they be teaching now?
    ... You have only to look at Answers in Genesis' website to see how science ... forward to a new heaven and Earth where there will be no more pain, ... that ID is the consensus theory among scientists. ... Some young-earth creationists are persuaded by Bible-based arguments ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: The "Great" Debate: the Up and Coming Theories for Creationism and Evolution
    ... > in policy debate. ... > creationists. ... Find out if he is a YEC (Young Earth Creationist), ... If your opponent is going to advocate the theory of intelligent design, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • =?windows-1252?Q?Re=3A_29_=91Evidences=92_for_Macroevolution?=
    ... there might be some value in seeing how creationists were ... But now that you mention it, it's interesting that a YEC group would ... they know that a young Earth is far less likely to be ... creationists, probably most of them are islamic, but the Christian ...
    (talk.origins)
  • The Myth of Millions of Years
    ... "Two Hundred Years of Christian Compromise on the Age of the Earth." ... Mortenson once again explained why creationists are so eager to overthrow ... attendees that "the Bible is the history book of the universe." ... Dr. Jason Lisle took up the challenge distant starlight poses to young Earth ...
    (soc.culture.african.american)