Re: Darwin misquoted on Wikipedia Natural Selection

On Sep 16, 6:07 am, backspace <sawireless2...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Sep 13, 1:23 pm, backspace <sawireless2...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

There is no person by the name of "evolution". I am not asking some
abstract undefined 'evolution' concept but a human being to explain me
the origin of life. If you as a human can't even begin to explain
where life came from then how do you know that the common descent
hypothesis explains anything.
the origin of life has nothing to do with the evolution of life.

And until you tell me who established this your are not even wrong.
Well Darwin established it when he called his book "the Origins of
Species" and not "the Origin of Life", but really it's obvious. I'm
not surprised you don't understand it. By the way, how's that three-
body problem going ?

By
who's decree was it decided that we
only start the discussion from the first living cell? What came before
the cell - a molten earth that cooled down and
formed rocks. In other words we came from a rock?
That's a question for the abiogenesis researchers, not evolution. The
same way the structure of the cell is the work of biochemists and
microbiologists, not evolutionary researchers. See how it works ? No,
of course you don't.

And because
evolutionists want to look intellectually respectable they invented a
"common ancestor" to obfuscate their intent that they believe a chimp
that showed its willy for the monkey babes morphed into a human
That's a new one to me. Amusingly, it would imply that those chimps
that didn't morph into humans don't show their willies for monkey
babes. Ever heard of bonobo chimps ?

and by
pure argument from authority they have decided that what came before
the first living cell is verboten because then people will realize
that what they are actually saying is that we came from a rock.
What came before the first cell is not verboten at all, it's just not
evolution. It's abiogenesis. Idiot.
Oh, and evolutionists don't say people came from a rock, creationists
do. Well, powdered rock at least.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Christof Koch
    ... Simpler Origin for Life" from earlier this year by Prof. Robert Shapiro, ... Life began with the appearance of the first RNA molecule. ... before proteins and DNA in the evolution of life. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Christof Koch
    ... Simpler Origin for Life" from earlier this year by Prof. Robert Shapiro, ... Life began with the appearance of the first RNA molecule. ... before proteins and DNA in the evolution of life. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Christof Koch
    ... Simpler Origin for Life" from earlier this year by Prof. Robert Shapiro, ... Life began with the appearance of the first RNA molecule. ... before proteins and DNA in the evolution of life. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Christof Koch
    ... Simpler Origin for Life" from earlier this year by Prof. Robert Shapiro, ... Life began with the appearance of the first RNA molecule. ... before proteins and DNA in the evolution of life. ...
    (talk.atheism)
  • Re: Atheists are the biggest fools on Earth
    ... We're talking about evolution, which is orthogonal. ... Science has shown that this is not the case. ... >>>to all life and explains everything. ... >>eukaryotes are related through a single common ancestor. ...
    (talk.origins)
Loading