Re: Evolution of Bird Feather and Aerofoil
- From: UC <uraniumcommittee@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 22:22:22 -0000
On Sep 14, 5:20 pm, Augray <aug...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:50:06 -0000, UC
<uraniumcommitteechair...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<uranium-1189785006.630603.127...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> :
On Sep 14, 11:26 am, r norman <r_s_norman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:11:23 -0000, UC <uraniumcommit...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
<snip>
Here is some good(?) science on the matter:
http://www.biomechanics.bio.uci.edu/_html/nh_biomech/flight/flight.htm
Don't you realize that this citation only confirms the significance of
the difference between tree-down and ground-up?
No.
I don't get it. Perhapos there's something I'm missing. Once the
'bird' is in the tree, it can glide down. Duh? I don't see these as
exclusive behaviours, but rather as two sides of the same evolutionary
achievement. Little animals can get airborne easier than big ones,
How so? Can a mouse get airborne than an owl?
I said 'bird'. Read what I write, not what you imagine I write. My
point was that small animals were pre-adapted for flight in the sense
that they were light. Bats look a lot like mice...imagine that!
and
they can climb easier too!
Can an earthworm climb a tree easier than a cat?
Que???
I don't understand how this is anything
resembling a coherent dichotomy.
I'm not surprised.
Unlike Harshman and Norman, I'll make a futile effort to teach you,
for the benefit of the lurkers.
The "ground-up" vs "tree-down" dichotomy is laugable. It's much more
complex than that. Feathers had to evolve BEFORE flight, not as a
response to a 'desire' for flight. Proto-avians could have used the
feathered 'arms' to shield their eggs from the sun, to enable them to
hop up and down over their nests to create wind; one can imagine all
sorts of possibilities, and the truth is probably so bizarre we cannot
even imagine it.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Evolution of Bird Feather and Aerofoil
- From: Augray
- Re: Evolution of Bird Feather and Aerofoil
- From: Arkalen
- Re: Evolution of Bird Feather and Aerofoil
- References:
- Re: Evolution of Bird Feather and Aerofoil
- From: Augray
- Re: Evolution of Bird Feather and Aerofoil
- From: UC
- Re: Evolution of Bird Feather and Aerofoil
- From: Augray
- Re: Evolution of Bird Feather and Aerofoil
- From: John Wilkins
- Re: Evolution of Bird Feather and Aerofoil
- From: John Harshman
- Re: Evolution of Bird Feather and Aerofoil
- From: John Wilkins
- Re: Evolution of Bird Feather and Aerofoil
- From: UC
- Re: Evolution of Bird Feather and Aerofoil
- From: r norman
- Re: Evolution of Bird Feather and Aerofoil
- From: UC
- Re: Evolution of Bird Feather and Aerofoil
- From: Augray
- Re: Evolution of Bird Feather and Aerofoil
- Prev by Date: Re: Religious right and global warming
- Next by Date: Re: Desertphile. YouTube, Hovind Crime Family, and Fraudulent DMCA Complaints
- Previous by thread: Re: Evolution of Bird Feather and Aerofoil
- Next by thread: Re: Evolution of Bird Feather and Aerofoil
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|