Re: Religion Good For Evolution?
- From: "Perplexed in Peoria" <jimmenegay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 20:28:28 -0400
"alwaysaskingquestions" <alwaysaskingquestions@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:5ktukjF5hje3U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Perplexed in Peoria wrote:
"alwaysaskingquestions" <alwaysaskingquestions@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Perplexed in Peoria wrote:
"alwaysaskingquestions" <alwaysaskingquestions@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
Ok, then I disagree with the premise. Most people do NOT think that
altruism generally increases fitness and is generally favored by
natural selection.
Can you give examples of that?
Examples of "people who do not think ..."? Just about everyone who has
worked on the ideas of kin selection and reciprocal altruism and group
selection as partial explanations for the existence of altruism in nature.
Or do you want examples of cases in which altruism does not increase
fitness? You yourself cited the observation that there are people who
literally give their lives to various 'altruistic' causes instead of
staying home and raising the kiddies 'as Nature intended'.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Religion Good For Evolution?
- From: alwaysaskingquestions
- Re: Religion Good For Evolution?
- References:
- Religion Good For Evolution?
- From: alwaysaskingquestions
- Re: Religion Good For Evolution?
- From: Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Religion Good For Evolution?
- From: alwaysaskingquestions
- Re: Religion Good For Evolution?
- From: Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Religion Good For Evolution?
- From: alwaysaskingquestions
- Religion Good For Evolution?
- Prev by Date: Re: Madeleine McCann
- Next by Date: Re: Us presidential elections - all candidates hence disqualified
- Previous by thread: Re: Religion Good For Evolution?
- Next by thread: Re: Religion Good For Evolution?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|