Re: An idle question

On Aug 30, 3:10 am, rem6...@xxxxxxxxx (Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t)
wrote:

I have no way to know whether you have any personal experience or
not, since my own personal experience is the only person experience
accessible to me. (If you believe empathic people can directly feel
how others feel, you've been watching Spok from Vulkan on StarTrek
too much and taking it too seriously.)

There was a controlled test. Three different handlers fed rabbits
cholesterol poison food. One fed with indifference, one fed with
anger, one fed with love and cuddles. None of them knew it was poison.
For the first two, the rabbits cholesterol rose. For the third it did
not.

Scientists have proven that time and time again a classroom of
children can change the direction of a propeller set into motion
within a vacuum. There are hundreds of documented tests which you book-
learned people fail to read up on, and fail to acknowledge.

In certain societies, smokers work at hard labor for well over 100
years because of belief- those cultures believe that the older you
get the stronger you get. Deepak Chopra showed me a picture of a 113
year old woman with a bundle of sticks on her back riding a mule with
an unfiltered cigarette in her mouth.

I could go on and on and on.



The really sad thing is that your stupid belief in your stupid
scriptures has warped your mind so badly that you actually believe
ancient Babylon, a civilization that died out thousands of years
ago, is *still* alive and active and responsible for lots of things
you personally don't like in the world, such as any time anyone
disagrees with your stupid scripture. Get out of your fantasy world
already!!

Umm....hey tardo....babylon is a slang term for urban society
nowadays.
Are you really that out of touch?



And even while you're here you can't see the forest for the trees.

Didn't your mommy teach you to fix your own glass house before
throwing stones out from it? You're the one who sees your stupid
scriptures as the only ancient myth worth seriously considering.

Umm...wrong. I think everything from the Bible to the Epic of
Gilgamesh to the Norse Eddas is worth serious consideration. How did
you assume that only one type of scripture was valuable to me from
what I wrote?


Why don't you expand your horizon and study *all* the hundreds of
local myth systems, the whole forest of myth systems, instead of
just that one really really stupid Hebrew tree?

I do and did, obviously alot more than you have.

You not only can't
see the forest, you can't even see more than just that one tree.


Yep you're pretty brain damaged. What made you think that about me? I
certainly wrote nothing of the sort.



Bang doesn't cover stuff it was never meant to cover, you must be
really sad about how drinking milk doesn't make you "high" in the
sense of intoxicated.

Are you trying to say that ignorant people (many of whom are on this
forum) don't attempt to attack religion using Big Bang and Evolution
as "evidence" to destroy it?
If so, you really are living in Never-Never Land.



Likewise evolution only describes how life changed over time, after
the first life had already somehow started. Since the first life
was appx. ten billion years after the start of the Big Bang,
evolution is even further from from explaining the origin of the
Universe than the Big Bang was. If you're sad about evolution not
explaining where the universe came from, you're psychotic.

What I was reffering to is "sad" is the fact that people try to
disprove God with these things.
You really are a wanna-be spin doctor aren't you?



But you are ignorant enough to think that it does,

No I'm not, and I rather dis-appreciate you putting false words in
my mouth as if I had said them. Do you know the meaning of the
legal term "libel"? If not, you need to learn it, today, not
tomorrow. Here, I'll help you get started:

LOL right from the mouth a spin doctor who has been trying to put
words in MY mouth for about 5 paragraphs now. Hilarious.



<http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=libel>

and so you ignore the absolute need for an Unmoved Mover

Who needs an unmoved mover??? What makes you think anyone needs one of those?

Oh exceuse me. Only people with common sense need one of those.



and instead believe in Spontaneous Generation.

You're showing that you're psychotic again, getting upset about yet
another hypothesis ten billion years from where you expect it to
apply. You're not even using the correct term, "abiogenesis", which
is the spontaneous occurrance of some very primitive replicator
(probably true, really did happen),

No it didn't. And it couldn't. Get nerdy and worship the illusions of
quantum theory all you want. It still couldn't happen when NOTHING
existed.

Complete nothing is gonna stay nothing forever. Had to be an unmoved
mover. Period.



Only Creationists believe any such thing, claiming that some
supernatural spirit can suddenly create fully-formed life out of
totally abiotic material. I agree it's sad that Creationists have
such stupid beliefs.

Wrong once again. We're talking about creating something minute and
abiotic out of NOTHING, not fully formed life out of abiotic material,
you misunderstanding spin doctor!


I suppose everyone except you and your fellow Creationists
understands that you shot yourself in the foot there.

Well...no...because I'm not a creationist. I believe in evolution and
I believe in the Big Bang. Or haven't you read anything I wrote. Are
you on meds? Please take them.


(All I did was to document the shooting, like any good reporter/witness.)

Hmm, if I could only think of a single word, at most three
syllables, that means "shooting in foot", I could make up a new
"religion" called "X. Witness" where X is that word. Any good
linguists here with a suggestion for that word? Does Latin have
any word like that?

Yeah and I'm sure since you are smarter than a third of the people on
earth, a third of the people would believe you. And then you'd have a
religion as big as Christianity. get to it, boy!





.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Home schooled kids forced back to public...
    ... species has helped YOU in life? ... evolution is the basis for all modern biology, ... evolution to dissect a frog, but it sure makes the knowledge you ... bang book. ...
    (rec.sport.football.college)
  • Re: Evolutions. how wrong am I?
    ... Then, BANG ... Life started out as a single organism and became the vast ... Perhaps Geologists are really detectives, fornesic rock detectives, ... >I think the meaning of evolution could be clarified. ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: Big Bang Theroists
    ... > After the theory of the Big Bang, ... > chemicals to produce life to come together at the exact same time ... > believe in the Big Bang and Evolution theory than it does in ... I suppose you don't ever consider that life arise because of, ...
    (uk.sci.astronomy)
  • Re: the big picture
    ... about abiogenesis or the Big Bang. ... evolution, since evolution says nothing about the ultimate origin of ... It only says that life evolves. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Christof Koch
    ... Simpler Origin for Life" from earlier this year by Prof. Robert Shapiro, ... Life began with the appearance of the first RNA molecule. ... before proteins and DNA in the evolution of life. ...
    (talk.origins)
Loading