Re: the inconvenience to EE of subduction observed in the real world and expansion not so observed
- From: "louann_m@xxxxxxxxx" <louann_m@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 06:35:32 -0700
On Aug 29, 5:24 pm, Kent Paul Dolan <xanth...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Trying to defend a _single_ usage of a _two letter_
acronym against all other claimants is an exercise
in futility every bit as silly as trying to proclaim
that earth has been expanding since dragonflies were
large, in pretense that they were instead tiny:
Okay, granted. But surely _some_ "alternative" ideas are so lame that
we're entitled to ignore them. Expanding earth is several credibility
points below Flat Earth, and we don't beat them into dead-horse pate.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- the inconvenience to EE of subduction observed in the real world and expansion not so observed
- From: Kent Paul Dolan
- Re: the inconvenience to EE of subduction observed in the real world and expansion not so observed
- From: louann_m@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: the inconvenience to EE of subduction observed in the real world and expansion not so observed
- From: Kent Paul Dolan
- the inconvenience to EE of subduction observed in the real world and expansion not so observed
- Prev by Date: Re: Hummingbird teeth
- Next by Date: Re: No volcanoes on the spreading ridge.
- Previous by thread: Re: the inconvenience to EE of subduction observed in the real world and expansion not so observed
- Next by thread: Re: the inconvenience to EE of subduction observed in the real world and expansion not so observed
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|