Re: the inconvenience to EE of subduction observed in the real world and expansion not so observed

On Aug 29, 3:55 pm, Kent Paul Dolan <xanth...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
It's too bad for the expanding earth fraud-science
that it depends so heavily on data whose exact
opposite is what is found.

I think that to warrant the term "fraud," there must be a certain
minimum risk that a person (a) of normal sanity (b) and normal
intelligence (c) who has heard of the concept in the first place would
be fooled by it.

I'm not sure what specific number I'd put on that (1%?) but the silly-
putty-earth doesn't qualify.

I mention this primarily because EE (electrical engineering) is a
perfectly good abbreviation, and re-purposing it for these guys
dilutes its usefulness with little in return.


.