Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: Walter Bushell <proto@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 03:14:09 -0400
In article <1i3kf1w.8xtxnvb1z85zN%j.wilkins1@xxxxxxxxx>,
j.wilkins1@xxxxxxxxx (John Wilkins) wrote:
Walter Bushell <proto@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <ymir-B12519.20003826082007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Ymir <ymir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article
<uranium-1188164213.880727.91110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
UC <uraniumcommittee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 25, 11:22 pm, Walter Bushell <pr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article
<uranium-1188069605.985097.93...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, UC
<uraniumcommit...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
Yes, but German and English are not really all that similar in
syntax.
If German word order is for English used, it must awkward and silly
seem.
Oh, bother it! It is still quite understandable. In fact many words
in
common are. You will find a great difference if you go to the
Romance
languages even or Sanskrit or the languages descended from it. I have
heard people who have studied languages outside the Indo-European
family
say that by comparison they are dialects of the same language.
One Amerindian language at least conjugates verbs depending on how
the
speaker knows what he is talking about. There is one verb form for
"It
rained on me.', one for "I see it raining from inside" and one for
"Someone told me it was raining.", for example. Hawaiian has no verb
"to
be".
How does Hamlet's soliloquey sound in Hawaiian?
Many languages lack a copular verb 'to be'. I'm not aware of any that
lack an existential verb 'to be' (including Hawai'ian).
Andre
Some people proposed English prime which is English shorn of the verb
"to be".
And what that? Not understand.
Just the English (or perhaps American) langage without the verb "to be".
No "is", "was", "were", "are" or any other such conjugate.
.
- References:
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: UC
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: UC
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: Harvest Dancer
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: UC
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: Harvest Dancer
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: UC
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: Harvest Dancer
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: UC
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: Ymir
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: UC
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: Ymir
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: UC
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: Walter Bushell
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: UC
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: Ymir
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: Walter Bushell
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: John Wilkins
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- Prev by Date: Re: Implausibility that we can be explained by evolution
- Next by Date: Re: Implausibility that we can be explained by evolution
- Previous by thread: Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- Next by thread: Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading