Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- From: Klaus Hellnick <kShePllnAickM@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 03:48:20 GMT
Noelie S. Alito wrote:
Klaus Hellnick wrote:Augray wrote:On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 22:41:46 GMT, Klaus Hellnick
<kShePllnAickM@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<KSJyi.47224$Um6.18732@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> :
Augray wrote:On 21 Aug 2007 08:17:22 -0700, TomS <TomS_member@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote inReally? They are hot? I find that hard to believe.
<197709442.000160ab.003.0001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> :
"On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:07:31 -0500, in articlePossibly because meteorites are hot when they first fall from the sky,
<slrnfclvtj.1qpc.wettering@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mark VandeWettering
stated..."
[...snip...]Iron use does go back to 4000B.C. It was largely because of meteroric[...snip...]
iron. The ability to smelt iron from ore only happened much later. We know this because the _furnaces_ themselves _don't_ rust and _aren't_
recycled. These furnaces are rather specialized because of the high temperatures required. We see no evidence of them anywhere near 4000 B.C.
Which makes me wonder how people ever came up with the
idea of smelting iron. Why ever think of making higher
temperature furnaces?
and if current furnaces can't re-melt the meteorite, a hotter one may
be required. But admittedly, this is sheer speculation.
That's why you can see them in the sky.
Um, no. A small amount of the surface ablates upon entry for a few seconds, then the meteor hits terminal velocity and the surface is cooled by wind. The meteorite may heat slightly upon impact with the ground, but is unlikely to get hot, especially considering that it started out extremely cold in space.
Phil Plait addresses this in his book Bad_Astronomy, and online at:
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/top5_myths_020903-5.html
Thank you VERY much!
:)
Klaus
.
- References:
- Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- From: Lee Oswald Ving
- Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- From: mccoy
- Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- From: Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- From: TomS
- Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- From: Augray
- Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- From: Klaus Hellnick
- Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- From: Augray
- Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- From: Klaus Hellnick
- Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- From: Noelie S. Alito
- Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- Prev by Date: Re: This argument surprised me
- Next by Date: Re: Playboy article on the common ancestor between man and ape
- Previous by thread: Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- Next by thread: Re: Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|