Footprints on the expanding earth
- From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 20:42:15 -0700
"Paleoanthropologist Tim White, professor of integrative biology at UC
Berkeley, is familiar with the "so-called footprints" and knows Renne
well, frequently collaborating with him in the dating of million-year-
old sediments in an area of Ethiopia where White has excavated
numerous fossils of human ancestors. He is not surprised at the new
finding.
"The evidence (the British team) has provided in their arguments that
these are footprints is not sufficient to convince me they are
footprints," said White, who did not contribute to the new work that
Renne's group is reporting in Nature. "The evidence Paul has produced
by dating basically means that this argument is over, unless
indisputable footprints can be found sealed within the ash."
Well if there are a bunch of these...
http://www.mexicanfootprints.co.uk/
I would have to say they do look like footprints to me.
I think the issue here is how the rock is being dated, and according
to the now defunct theory of paleomagnetism which had the poles
switching at regular intervals, the rock should be 1.3 million years
old, but other scientists date the rock at 40,000 years old.
Where the extra mass is coming from, in the expanding earth, may be
the nuclear reactions at the earth's core, creating heavier elements,
basically from adding the mass of the quantum foam itself perhaps.
Its possibly getting sucked into the core region as the earth expands
into n dimensional space.
And this may be fueling the expansion of the earth as we see it in 3
Dimensional size.
And that is sort of what appears to be showing with islands of matter,
that surround the core.
http://nuclearplanet.com/timetable.htm
One thing to keep in mind, is that the force of gravity, is like the
force imparted on accelerated mass.
If you accelerate in a jet, you feel that mass and we call it G's.
But going the other way, the best you can do is weightless.
And the expansion of the earth and all matter all planetary bodies all
suns etc into hyperspace, the space between things, is what gives rise
to gravity. (GR)
But that happens at a fast rate, whereas the expansion of matter that
we see, such as the expansion of the earth is a relative size
difference. A secondary effect.
With the expansion of the universe into n dimensional space, it all
happens at the same time, it is an ongoing continuous thing, so all
things expand relatively the same, because of the relatively same
ambient pressure of the universe on the molecular level. Permitivity
permeability of free space etc.
The outward tug of the void, on the planet, (the big suck) is what
makes it easier for the planet to expand.
It wants to expand into n dimensional space, and the universe is open,
and that means that the force forcing the universe to expand, is
greater than the portion, which people see as attractive gravity,
which counter acts that and wants the universe to collapse on itself.
The difference between the two, the so-called attractive force of
gravity, and the repulsive force of the cosmological constant,
(translated the expansion of matter and the magnetic effect of matter)
may be proportional to the amount the earth has expanded. And the
distance the moon is moving away from the earth, may also be related
proportionally.
Those things should be checked out.
For the moon, if you picture large waves of dark energy being emitted
by the earth, and the moon is sitting in a trough (as opposed to a
wave crest). And as the earth gets larger, in diameter, that trough
may be farther away from the earth proportionally.
Its worth investigating at any rate.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Footprints on the expanding earth
- From: David Iain Greig
- Re: Footprints on the expanding earth
- Prev by Date: Re: noah dies Dec 24 of 2021 BC
- Next by Date: Re: This argument surprised me
- Previous by thread: Re: University of Minnesota astronomers find gaping hole in the Universe
- Next by thread: Re: Footprints on the expanding earth
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
