Science Disproves Evolution

</font></center></b></i></font></center></b></i><font
color=red><center><b><br>
Interstellar Gas
</font></center></b><p>
Detailed analyses indicate that neither stars nor planets could form
from interstellar gas clouds (a). To do so, either by first forming
dust particles (b) or by direct gravitational collapse of the gas, (c)
would require vastly more time than the alleged age of the universe.
An obvious alternative is that stars and planets were created.
<p>
a . <i><font color=blue> "The process by which an interstellar cloud
is concentrated until it is held together gravitationally to become a
protostar is not known. In quantitative work, it has simply been
assumed that the number of atoms per cm^3 has somehow increased about
a thousand-fold over that in a dense nebula. The two principal factors
inhibiting the formation of a protostar are that the gas has a
tendency to disperse before the density becomes high enough for self-
gravitation to be effective, and that any initial angular momentum
would cause excessively rapid rotation as the material contracts. Some
mechanism must therefore be provided for gathering the material into a
sufficiently small volume that self-gravitation may become effective,
and the angular momentum must in some way be removed." </i></font> Eva
Novotny, <I>Introduction to Stellar Atmospheres and Interiors</I> (New
York: Oxford University Press, 1973), pp. 279-280.
<p>
b . Martin Harwit, <I>Astrophysical Concepts</I> (New York: John Wiley
& Sons, 1973), p. 394.
<p>
<i><font color=blue> "... there is no reasonable astronomical scenario
in which mineral grains can condense." </i></font> Fred Hoyle and
Chandra Wickramasinghe, "Where Microbes Boldly Went," <I>New
Scientist, </I> Vol. 91, 13 August 1981, p. 413.
<p>
c . <i><font color=blue> "Contemporary opinion on star formation holds
that objects called protostars are formed as condensations from the
interstellar gas. This condensation process is very difficult
theoretically, and no essential theoretical understanding can be
claimed; in fact, some theoretical evidence argues strongly against
the possibility of star formation. However, we know that the stars
exist, and we must do our best to account for them." </i></font> John
C. Brandt, <I>The Physics and Astronomy of the Sun and Stars</I> (New
York: McGraw-Hill, 1966), p. 111.
<p>
Theories for the Evolution of the Solar System and Universe Are
Unscientific and Hopelessly Inadequate
<p>
http://www.creationscience.com/

Interstellar Gas

Detailed analyses indicate that neither stars nor planets could form
from interstellar gas clouds (a). To do so, either by first forming
dust particles (b) or by direct gravitational collapse of the gas(c),
would require vastly more time than the alleged age of the universe.
An obvious alternative is that stars and planets were created.

a . "The process by which an interstellar cloud is concentrated until
it is held together gravitationally to become a protostar is not
known. In quantitative work, it has simply been assumed that the
number of atoms per cm^3 has somehow increased about a thousand-fold
over that in a dense nebula. The two principal factors inhibiting the
formation of a protostar are that the gas has a tendency to disperse
before the density becomes high enough for self-gravitation to be
effective, and that any initial angular momentum would cause
excessively rapid rotation as the material contracts. Some mechanism
must therefore be provided for gathering the material into a
sufficiently small volume that self-gravitation may become effective,
and the angular momentum must in some way be removed." Eva Novotny,
Introduction to Stellar Atmospheres and Interiors (New York: Oxford
University Press, 1973), pp. 279-280.

b . Martin Harwit, Astrophysical Concepts (New York: John Wiley &
Sons, 1973), p. 394.

"... there is no reasonable astronomical scenario in which mineral
grains can condense." Fred Hoyle and Chandra Wickramasinghe, "Where
Microbes Boldly Went," New Scientist, Vol. 91, 13 August 1981, p.
413.

c . "Contemporary opinion on star formation holds that objects called
protostars are formed as condensations from the interstellar gas. This
condensation process is very difficult theoretically, and no essential
theoretical understanding can be claimed; in fact, some theoretical
evidence argues strongly against the possibility of star formation.
However, we know that the stars exist, and we must do our best to
account for them." John C. Brandt, The Physics and Astronomy of the
Sun and Stars (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966), p. 111.

Theories for the Evolution of the Solar System and Universe Are
Unscientific and Hopelessly Inadequate

http://www.creationscience.com/

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Just a few small questions I hope.
    ... hydrogen is constantly being converted into helium as stars shine. ... Hoyle, a leading astronomer, maintains that, if the universe were as old ... surface abundances of certain metals similar to interstellar gas rather than ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Science Disproves Evolution
    ... from interstellar gas clouds. ... An obvious alternative is that stars and planets were created. ...
    (sci.bio.paleontology)
  • Science Disproves Evolution
    ... from interstellar gas clouds. ... An obvious alternative is that stars and planets were created. ...
    (talk.religion.misc)
  • Science Disproves Evolution
    ... from interstellar gas clouds. ... An obvious alternative is that stars and planets were created. ...
    (sci.bio.paleontology)
  • Science Disproves Evolution
    ... from interstellar gas clouds. ... An obvious alternative is that stars and planets were created. ...
    (talk.origins)