Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- From: Augray <augray@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:53:24 -0400
On 21 Aug 2007 08:17:22 -0700, TomS <TomS_member@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<197709442.000160ab.003.0001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> :
"On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:07:31 -0500, in article
<slrnfclvtj.1qpc.wettering@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mark VandeWettering
stated..."
[...snip...]
Iron use does go back to 4000B.C. It was largely because of meteroric[...snip...]
iron. The ability to smelt iron from ore only happened much later.
We know this because the _furnaces_ themselves _don't_ rust and _aren't_
recycled. These furnaces are rather specialized because of the high
temperatures required. We see no evidence of them anywhere near
4000 B.C.
Which makes me wonder how people ever came up with the
idea of smelting iron. Why ever think of making higher
temperature furnaces?
Possibly because meteorites are hot when they first fall from the sky,
and if current furnaces can't re-melt the meteorite, a hotter one may
be required. But admittedly, this is sheer speculation.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- From: Klaus Hellnick
- Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- From: Kermit
- Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- References:
- Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- From: Lee Oswald Ving
- Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- From: mccoy
- Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- From: Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- From: TomS
- Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- Prev by Date: Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- Next by Date: Re: Behe book review: Pa. scientist again attacks evolution
- Previous by thread: Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- Next by thread: Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|