Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- From: Mark VandeWettering <wettering@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:07:31 -0500
On 2007-08-21, mccoy@xxxxxxxxxx <mccoy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 20, 4:50 pm, Lee Oswald Ving <leeov...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
mc...@xxxxxxxxxx wrote in news:mccoy-1187651750.058268.247780
@j4g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
Yes, but the other source says "probably". Historians make mistakes
all the time.
And yet you're basing your entire attack on these 'historians' work.
You're screwed either way, McWelsher.
I'm not basing my view merely on these "historians" work Oswald. The
fact is I cited a metallurgist and 4 historian perspectives, all of
which state that iron use goes back to 4000 BC.
Iron use does go back to 4000B.C. It was largely because of meteroric
iron. The ability to smelt iron from ore only happened much later.
We know this because the _furnaces_ themselves _don't_ rust and _aren't_
recycled. These furnaces are rather specialized because of the high
temperatures required. We see no evidence of them anywhere near
4000 B.C.
Mark
Ye Olde One, Bobbie,
is clearly wrong on this matter and simply refuses to recant. He is
free to continue as he does, if he wants to put forth false
information then that's his business. In the meantime it's back to
scientists confront evolutionists.
JM
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- From: mccoy
- Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- From: mccoy
- Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- From: TomS
- Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- References:
- Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- From: Lee Oswald Ving
- Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- From: mccoy
- Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- Prev by Date: Re: expanding universe
- Next by Date: Re: What would science be like if intelligent design hadn't been a dishonest scam?
- Previous by thread: Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- Next by thread: Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
