Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- From: mccoy@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 21:58:03 -0700
On Aug 20, 4:50 pm, Lee Oswald Ving <leeov...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
mc...@xxxxxxxxxx wrote in news:mccoy-1187651750.058268.247780
@j4g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
Yes, but the other source says "probably". Historians make mistakes
all the time.
And yet you're basing your entire attack on these 'historians' work.
You're screwed either way, McWelsher.
I'm not basing my view merely on these "historians" work Oswald. The
fact is I cited a metallurgist and 4 historian perspectives, all of
which state that iron use goes back to 4000 BC. Ye Olde One, Bobbie,
is clearly wrong on this matter and simply refuses to recant. He is
free to continue as he does, if he wants to put forth false
information then that's his business. In the meantime it's back to
scientists confront evolutionists.
JM
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- From: Augray
- Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- From: Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- From: Lee Oswald Ving
- Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- From: Wakboth
- Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- References:
- Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- From: Lee Oswald Ving
- Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- Prev by Date: Re: Remote Control
- Next by Date: Naturalistic basis for morality
- Previous by thread: Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- Next by thread: Re: Iron use: 4000BC
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
