Re: Iron use: 4000BC

mccoy@xxxxxxxxxx wrote in news:mccoy-1187651750.058268.247780
@j4g2000prf.googlegroups.com:

Yes, but the other source says "probably". Historians make mistakes
all the time.

And yet you're basing your entire attack on these 'historians' work.

You're screwed either way, McWelsher.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Iron use: 4000BC
    ... And yet you're basing your entire attack on these 'historians' work. ... You're screwed either way, McWelsher. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Iron use: 4000BC
    ... And yet you're basing your entire attack on these 'historians' work. ... You're screwed either way, McWelsher. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Iron use: 4000BC
    ... And yet you're basing your entire attack on these 'historians' work. ... You're screwed either way, McWelsher. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Iron use: 4000BC
    ... And yet you're basing your entire attack on these 'historians' work. ... You're screwed either way, McWelsher. ... Iron use does go back to 4000B.C. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Different Allied Tactics in 1940
    ... I was referring to Patton's attack in 1944. ... Gamelin did not think it impossible; he just didn't think it would be ... I don't know that he (Whiting, that is) is a buffoon, but you ... and historians generally don't do ...
    (soc.history.war.world-war-ii)