Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: Walter Bushell <proto@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:57:15 -0400
In article <1i2ijmw.kbig65hdxyx3N%j.wilkins1@xxxxxxxxx>,
j.wilkins1@xxxxxxxxx (John Wilkins) wrote:
UC <uraniumcommittee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You wrote that "Recent" was a technical term while "recent" wasn't,
and that the difference was due to capitalization.
The capitalized version happens to be a technical term in geology, and
is therefore capitalized. It's not a technical term because it's
capitalized; It's capitalized because it's a technical term.
And in this, UC is correct.
UC found to be correct. Film at 11.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: Bob Casanova
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- References:
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: Harvest Dancer
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: UC
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: Harvest Dancer
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: UC
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: Harvest Dancer
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: UC
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: John Wilkins
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- Prev by Date: Re: Steven J's "thinking" and "logic" representative of Darwinism as a whole
- Next by Date: Re: Google fup duck -- AGAIN
- Previous by thread: Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- Next by thread: Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|