Re: Adaptive learning CPU

On 8 Aug, 17:40, spintronic <spintro...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 8 Aug, 08:24, richardalanforr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:> On 7 Aug, 22:43, spintronic <spintro...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

<snip>

Thats all relative, and dependent upon 1 factor. Time.

No, it isn't.

Yes it is.

Even "Mark Isaac" agrees with me, even though he said;
quote;> "I don't pay a lot of attention to spintronic".

end quote;

But then says;
Quote;> " Biological evolution does innovate, just not a lot at any one time."

End quote;

Which is exactly my point!

You's idiot's can't even agree with yourselves on your own theory!
LOL!


Scientists disagree with each other all the time, and resolve those
disagreements by testing hypotheses against the evidence.

How do creationists resolve their disagreements?

It's dependent on an evolutionary process which can only
build on previous structures.

You mean like the industrial revolution required "Newtons laws of
motion".

Newtons Laws of Motion are not structures.

You mean like the computer age required the development of "quantum
physics"

Quantum Physics is not a structure

You mean like GPS requires the development of SR & GR.
You mean like the cannon required the invention og gunpowder!

etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc..........................ad
infinitum!


You evidently struggle for reading comprehension.
1) theories are not structures
2) The fact that biological structures can only evolve by building on
previous structures does not mean that technology cannot build on
earlier technology.

Biological evolution *never* innovates, *never* produces completely
new systems

So where do your eyes come from?
From a long lineage of structures each based on preceeding structures,

1) accumulation of photosensitive proteins.
Which are modified versions of existing proteins

2) transparent layer over said proteins

Which is a modified version of existing skin cells

3) formation of crevice

Which is a modification to the surface of existing skin

4) thickening of transparant layer

Which is a modification of an existing transparent layer

5) Muscle formation around transparant layer

Which is a modification of existing musculature

Hmm let me see.

1) Development of photoreactive film.
2) pinhole camera
3) lense for pinhole
4) Iris
5) Focal zoom.

Wow, that sound's awefully similar!

Which just goes to show how limited your understanding is.
Try learning to read for comprehension.
You are making a fool of yourself.


> > Just like Newton said!



"If I have seen further than others, it is by standing upon the
shoulders of Giant's"

Exactly the same thing!

<snip>

Your last statement is incorrect!

My last statement was that you could learn better by reading a book
than by fucking yourself.

Evidently you disagree.

Fine.

Go *** yourself if you think that it is the best way to learn.

RF

.